Chacaltana Mendoza Alfonso, Jerez Lanza Vivian Fabiola, Llatas Perez Juan, Li Salvatierra Bruno, Vera Calderon Augusto
Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins. Lima, Perú; Clínica Internacional San Borja. Lima, Perú.
Instituto Gastroenterológico Boliviano Japonés. Cochabamba, Bolivia.
Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2019 Jan-Mar;39(1):38-44.
endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) elastography is considered a useful tool for the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions (SPL).
The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of elastography in patients with SPL.
A prospective, cross-sectional study was performed at the Rebagliati Hospital between July 2017 and June 2018. Patients with a diagnosis of SPL and echoendoscopic study, elastography and FNA were included. Qualitative and quantitative elastography: strain ratio (SR) and strain histogram, were performed and analyzed with histopathological results. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS elastography in detecting malignancy was calculated using receiver operating curve analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for the detection of malignancy were calculated.
Out of 832 EUS examinations performed, 46 patients with SPL (mean age, 64.6 years; 29 women) were included in the study. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 36 cases. In qualitative elastography, score 3 was most frequent (n = 39, 84.8%) with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 88.9%, 30% and 76.1%, respectively, for predict adenocarcinoma. A strain ratio of 15 or higher (100% sensitivity, 66.7% specificity and 97.8% accuracy) and a histogram of less than 49 (66.7% sensitivity, 97.6% specificity and 95.6% accuracy) predicts malignancy in SPL, with area under a ROC curve of 0.941 (95% CI, 0.82 - 1.0).
EUS elastography provides information to predict the malignant nature of the pancreatic lesion. In our study, the elastographic detection of a score 3, SR≥15 or a histogram <49 predicts the presence of malignancy in LSP.
内镜超声(EUS)弹性成像被认为是评估实性胰腺病变(SPL)的有用工具。
本研究的目的是评估弹性成像在SPL患者中的诊断性能。
2017年7月至2018年6月在雷巴利亚蒂医院进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究。纳入诊断为SPL并接受超声内镜检查、弹性成像和细针穿刺抽吸(FNA)的患者。进行定性和定量弹性成像:应变率(SR)和应变直方图,并与组织病理学结果进行分析。使用受试者操作特征曲线分析计算EUS弹性成像检测恶性肿瘤的诊断准确性。计算检测恶性肿瘤的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性。
在832次EUS检查中,46例SPL患者(平均年龄64.6岁;29名女性)纳入研究。36例诊断为胰腺腺癌。在定性弹性成像中,评分第3级最为常见(n = 39,84.8%),预测腺癌的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为88.9%、30%和76.1%。应变率为15或更高(敏感性100%,特异性66.7%,准确性97.8%)以及直方图小于49(敏感性66.7%,特异性97.6%,准确性95.6%)可预测SPL中的恶性肿瘤,ROC曲线下面积为0.941(95%CI,0.82 - 1.0)。
EUS弹性成像提供了预测胰腺病变恶性性质的信息。在我们的研究中,弹性成像检测到评分第3级、SR≥15或直方图<49可预测LSP中存在恶性肿瘤。