Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, Maryland.
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Jul 1;122(1):60-65. doi: 10.1152/jn.00840.2018. Epub 2019 May 1.
Motor control theories propose that the same motor plans can be employed by different effectors (e.g., the hand and arm). Skills learned with one effector can therefore "transfer" to others, which has potential applications in clinical situations. However, evidence from adaptation suggests this effect is not reciprocal; learning can be generalized from proximal to distal effectors (e.g., arm to hand), but not from distal to proximal effectors (e.g., hand to arm). We propose that skill learning may not follow the same pattern, because it relies on multiple learning processes beyond error detection and correction. Participants learned a skill task involving the production of isometric forces. We assessed their ability to perform the task with the hand and arm. One group then trained to perform the task using only their hand, whereas a second group trained using only their arm. In a final assessment, we found that participants who trained with either effector improved their skill in performing the task with both their hand and arm. There was no change in a control group that did not train between assessments, indicating that gains were related to the training, not the multiple assessments. These results indicate that in contrast to adaptation, motor skills can generalize from both proximal to distal effectors and from distal to proximal effectors. We propose this is due to differences in the processes underlying skill acquisition as compared with adaptation. Prior research indicates that motor learning transfers from proximal to distal effectors, but not vice versa. However, this work focused on adapting existing behavior; we questioned whether different results would occur during learning of new motor skills. We found that the benefits of training on a skill task with either the hand or arm transferred across both effectors. This highlights important differences between adaptation and skill learning, and may allow therapeutic benefits for patients with impairments in specific effectors.
运动控制理论提出,不同的效应器(如手和手臂)可以采用相同的运动计划。因此,用一种效应器习得的技能可以“转移”到其他效应器,这在临床情况下具有潜在的应用价值。然而,适应的证据表明这种效果不是相互的;从近端效应器(如手臂到手)可以推广学习,但不能从远端效应器(如手到手臂)推广学习。我们提出,技能学习可能不会遵循相同的模式,因为它依赖于错误检测和纠正之外的多种学习过程。参与者学习了一项涉及产生等长力的技能任务。我们评估了他们用手和手臂完成任务的能力。一组人随后仅用手进行训练,而另一组人仅用手臂进行训练。在最后的评估中,我们发现用任一种效应器进行训练的参与者都提高了用手和手臂完成任务的技能。没有接受训练的对照组在评估之间没有变化,这表明收益与训练有关,而不是与多次评估有关。这些结果表明,与适应不同,运动技能可以从近端效应器到远端效应器,也可以从远端效应器到近端效应器进行概括。我们提出,这是由于技能获取与适应相比,其基础过程存在差异。之前的研究表明,运动学习可以从近端效应器转移到远端效应器,但反之则不行。然而,这项工作侧重于适应现有的行为;我们质疑在学习新的运动技能时是否会出现不同的结果。我们发现,用手或手臂进行技能任务训练的好处可以跨效应器转移。这突出了适应和技能学习之间的重要区别,并可能为特定效应器受损的患者带来治疗益处。