Green Lara A, Gabriel David A
Department of Kinesiology, Brock University , St. Catharines, Ontario , Canada.
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Aug 1;120(2):468-479. doi: 10.1152/jn.00116.2018. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
Cross education is the strength gain or skill improvement transferred to the contralateral limb following unilateral training or practice. The present study examined the transfer of both strength and skill following a strength training program. Forty participants (20M, 20F) completed a 6-wk unilateral training program of dominant wrist flexion or dorsiflexion. Strength, force variability, and muscle activity were assessed pretraining, posttraining, and following 6 wk of detraining (retention). Analyses of covariance compared the experimental limb (trained or untrained) to the control (dominant or nondominant). There were no sex differences in the training response. Cross education of strength at posttraining was 6% ( P < 0.01) in the untrained arm and 13% ( P < 0.01) in the untrained leg. Contralateral strength continued to increase following detraining to 15% in the arm ( P < 0.01) and 14% in the leg ( P < 0.01). There was no difference in strength gains between upper and lower limbs ( P > 0.05). Cross education of skill (force variability) demonstrated greater improvements in the untrained limbs compared with the control limbs during contractions performed without concurrent feedback. Significant increases in V-wave amplitude ( P = 0.02) and central activation ( P < 0.01) were highly correlated with contralateral strength gains. There was no change in agonist amplitude or motor unit firing rates in the untrained limbs ( P > 0.05). The neuromuscular mechanisms mirrored the force increases at posttraining and retention supporting central drive adaptations of cross education. The continued strength increases at retention identified the presence of motor learning in cross education, as confirmed by force variability.
NEW & NOTEWORTHY: We examined cross education of strength and skill following 6 wk of unilateral training and 6 wk of detraining. A novel finding was the continued increase in contralateral strength following both training and detraining. Neuromuscular adaptations were highly correlated with strength gains in the trained and contralateral limbs. Motor learning was evident in the trained and contralateral limbs during contractions performed without concurrent feedback.
交叉训练效应是指在单侧训练或练习后,力量增强或技能提升转移到对侧肢体。本研究考察了力量训练计划后力量和技能的转移情况。40名参与者(20名男性,20名女性)完成了为期6周的优势手腕屈曲或背屈单侧训练计划。在训练前、训练后以及停训6周(保持期)后评估力量、力量变异性和肌肉活动。协方差分析将实验肢体(训练或未训练)与对照组(优势或非优势)进行比较。训练反应不存在性别差异。训练后,未训练手臂的力量交叉训练效应为6%(P < 0.01),未训练腿部为13%(P < 0.01)。停训后,对侧力量持续增加,手臂增加到15%(P < 0.01),腿部增加到14%(P < 0.01)。上下肢力量增加无差异(P > 0.05)。在无同步反馈的收缩过程中,技能(力量变异性)的交叉训练效应显示,未训练肢体与对照肢体相比有更大改善。V波振幅显著增加(P = 0.02)和中枢激活(P < 0.01)与对侧力量增加高度相关。未训练肢体的激动剂振幅或运动单位放电频率无变化(P > 0.05)。神经肌肉机制反映了训练后和保持期的力量增加,支持交叉训练效应的中枢驱动适应性。保持期力量持续增加表明交叉训练效应中存在运动学习,力量变异性证实了这一点。
我们考察了6周单侧训练和6周停训后的力量和技能交叉训练效应。一个新发现是训练和停训后对侧力量均持续增加。神经肌肉适应性与训练肢体和对侧肢体的力量增加高度相关。在无同步反馈的收缩过程中,训练肢体和对侧肢体均明显存在运动学习。