Suppr超能文献

对比增强内镜超声用于良性与恶性淋巴结的鉴别诊断:一项荟萃分析。

Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lymph nodes: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Lisotti Andrea, Ricci Claudio, Serrani Marta, Calvanese Claudio, Sferrazza Sandro, Brighi Nicole, Casadei Riccardo, Fusaroli Pietro

机构信息

Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Hospital of Imola, Imola, Bologna, Italy.

Department Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2019 Apr;7(4):E504-E513. doi: 10.1055/a-0854-3785. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

Abstract

The differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lymph nodes (LNs) is crucial for patient management and clinical outcome. The use of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been evaluated in several studies with diverse results. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the pooled diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) in this setting.  A systematic electronic search was performed, including all original papers dealing with assessment of the nature of the LNs using CE-EUS or CH-EUS. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio. The Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve method was used to calculate the area under the curve. Statistical analysis was carried out using Meta-Disc V.1.4, Stata V.12.0 and Review Manager V.5.2.  Among 210 pertinent studies, four (336 patients) were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity was 82.1 % (75.1 - 87.7 %) and pooled specificity was 90.7 % (85.9 - 94.3 %) with significant heterogeneity found in sensitivity; the positive-likelihood ratio (LR) was 7.77 (5.09 - 11.85) and the negative-LR was 0.15 (0.05 - 0.46); the pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 54 (15 - 190). Subgroup analysis including studies performed using CH-EUS (two studies, 177 LNs) showed a pooled sensitivity of 87.7 % (77.0 - 93.9 %) and a pooled specificity of 91.8 % (84.5 % - 96.4 %) with no significant heterogeneity; the pooled positive-LR was 9.51 (4.95 - 18.28) and the pooled negative-LR was 0.14 (0.06 - 0.35); pooled DOR was 68.42 (15.5 - 301.4).  From these data, CE-EUS is not recommended due to inadequate sensitivity. On the other hand, CH-EUS studies showed optimal accuracy (pooled sensitivity 87.7 % and specificity 91.8 %), comparable to elastography and even EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), suggesting a role in the diagnostic algorithm.

摘要

良性与恶性淋巴结的鉴别诊断对于患者管理和临床结局至关重要。多项研究对对比增强内镜超声(EUS)的应用进行了评估,结果各异。本荟萃分析的目的是评估对比增强EUS(CE-EUS)和对比增强谐波EUS(CH-EUS)在此情况下的合并诊断准确性。 进行了系统的电子检索,纳入所有使用CE-EUS或CH-EUS评估淋巴结性质的原始论文。进行荟萃分析以获得合并敏感度、特异度、阳性和阴性似然比以及诊断比值比。采用汇总受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线法计算曲线下面积。使用Meta-Disc V.1.4、Stata V.12.0和Review Manager V.5.2进行统计分析。 在210项相关研究中,4项研究(336例患者)纳入分析。合并敏感度为82.1%(75.1%-87.7%),合并特异度为90.7%(85.9%-94.3%),敏感度存在显著异质性;阳性似然比(LR)为7.77(5.09-11.85),阴性似然比为0.15(0.05-0.46);合并诊断比值比(DOR)为54(15-190)。包括使用CH-EUS进行的研究(2项研究,177个淋巴结)的亚组分析显示,合并敏感度为87.7%(77.0%-93.9%),合并特异度为91.8%(84.5%-96.4%),无显著异质性;合并阳性似然比为9.51(4.95-18.28),合并阴性似然比为0.14(0.06-0.35);合并DOR为68.42(15.5-301.4)。 基于这些数据,由于敏感度不足,不推荐使用CE-EUS。另一方面,CH-EUS研究显示出最佳准确性(合并敏感度87.7%,特异度91.8%),与弹性成像甚至EUS引导下细针穿刺抽吸(EUS-FNA)相当,提示其在诊断算法中具有一定作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b71/6447401/b290d28d13f1/10-1055-a-0854-3785-i1331ei1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验