• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血流储备分数是否高估了左前降支病变的严重程度?

Does fractional flow reserve overestimate severity of LAD lesions?

作者信息

Yokota Shu, Borren Nanette M, Ottervanger Jan Paul, Mouden Mohamed, Timmer Jorik R, Knollema Siert, Jager Pieter L

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Isala Hospital, Dr. Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 Aug;27(4):1306-1313. doi: 10.1007/s12350-019-01712-0. Epub 2019 May 1.

DOI:10.1007/s12350-019-01712-0
PMID:31044405
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is increasingly used to estimate the severity of coronary stenoses, prior to coronary revascularization. However, it has been suggested that FFR overestimates the severity of Left Anterior Descending (LAD) lesions. Our aim was to verify whether in patients without ischemia on Myocardial Perfusion Imaging, FFR of the LAD is more often abnormal in comparison to FFR of other coronary arteries.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent FFR measurement because of persistent or worsening of angina complaints, within 6 months after normal Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. FFR measurements of a graft or diagonal branch were excluded. A FFR ≤ 0.80 denoted a functionally relevant stenosis.

RESULTS

In 133 patients, 167 FFR measurements were performed, of which 85 in the LAD. Mean age of the patients was 64.8 ± 10.5 years, 40% were women. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between patients undergoing LAD and non-LAD measurements. An abnormal FFR was observed in 35.3% of the LAD measurements, compared to 9.8% in the non-LAD measurements (P = 0.001). Also after adjusting for age and gender, the FFR remained more frequently abnormal in the LAD with OR 5.2 (95% CI 2.2 to 12.3). Of the abnormal FFR LAD measurements, 70% were visually considered non-obstructive on invasive angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients without ischemia on MPI, FFR measurement of the LAD is significantly more often abnormal. The majority of these patients has no obstructive lesions on invasive angiography. Possibly, FFR overestimates severity of LAD lesions, with risk of unnecessary revascularization.

摘要

背景

在冠状动脉血运重建术前,血流储备分数(FFR)越来越多地用于评估冠状动脉狭窄的严重程度。然而,有人提出FFR高估了左前降支(LAD)病变的严重程度。我们的目的是验证在心肌灌注成像无缺血的患者中,与其他冠状动脉的FFR相比,LAD的FFR是否更常出现异常。

方法

对因心绞痛症状持续或加重而在心肌灌注成像正常后6个月内接受FFR测量的连续患者进行前瞻性队列研究。排除移植血管或对角支的FFR测量。FFR≤0.80表示存在功能相关狭窄。

结果

133例患者共进行了167次FFR测量,其中85次测量LAD。患者的平均年龄为64.8±10.5岁,40%为女性。进行LAD测量和非LAD测量的患者在基线特征上无差异。LAD测量中35.3%观察到FFR异常,而非LAD测量中这一比例为9.8%(P = 0.001)。在调整年龄和性别后,LAD的FFR仍更频繁地出现异常,比值比为5.2(95%可信区间2.2至12.3)。在FFR异常的LAD测量中,70%在有创血管造影中肉眼观察为非阻塞性病变。

结论

在MPI无缺血的特定患者中,LAD的FFR测量明显更常出现异常。这些患者中的大多数在有创血管造影中无阻塞性病变。FFR可能高估了LAD病变的严重程度,存在不必要血运重建的风险。

相似文献

1
Does fractional flow reserve overestimate severity of LAD lesions?血流储备分数是否高估了左前降支病变的严重程度?
J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 Aug;27(4):1306-1313. doi: 10.1007/s12350-019-01712-0. Epub 2019 May 1.
2
Quantitative evaluation improves specificity of myocardial perfusion SPECT in the assessment of functionally significant intermediate coronary artery stenoses: a comparative study with fractional flow reserve measurements.定量评估提高了心肌灌注 SPECT 在评估功能性中度冠状动脉狭窄中的特异性:与血流储备分数测量的对比研究。
Ann Nucl Med. 2013 Feb;27(2):132-9. doi: 10.1007/s12149-012-0666-4. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
3
Severity of morphological lesion complexity affects fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary stenosis.形态学病变复杂性的严重程度影响中度冠状动脉狭窄时的血流储备分数。
J Cardiol. 2015 Sep;66(3):239-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
4
Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease.血管造影多支冠状动脉疾病患者的血流储备分数和心肌灌注成像。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Mar;3(3):307-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.12.010.
5
On-site assessment of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve in comparison with myocardial perfusion imaging and invasive fractional flow reserve.计算机断层扫描衍生的血流储备分数与心肌灌注成像及有创血流储备分数的现场评估
Heart Vessels. 2020 Oct;35(10):1331-1340. doi: 10.1007/s00380-020-01606-z. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
6
Comparison between angiography and fractional flow reserve versus single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging for determining lesion significance in patients with multivessel coronary disease.血管造影与血流储备分数对比单光子发射计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像在多支冠状动脉疾病患者中确定病变显著性的比较
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Apr 1;99(7):896-902. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.11.035. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
7
Frequency of abnormal fractional flow reserve measurements among major coronary arteries.主要冠状动脉中异常血流储备分数测量的频率。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Feb;20(2):143-146. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
8
Comparison between non-invasive coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve to assess the functional significance of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity.比较非侵入性冠状动脉血流储备和血流储备分数评估中度严重左前降支狭窄的功能意义。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Apr;24(4):374-81. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.12.007. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
9
Prediction of Flow-Limiting Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease Based on Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.基于定量心肌灌注成像对稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者血流限制性血流储备分数的预测
Am J Cardiol. 2016 May 1;117(9):1417-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
10
Assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using fractional flow reserve (FFR) profiles derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) and invasive pressure measurements (FFRINV): Importance of the site of measurement and implications for patient referral for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.利用冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(FFRCT)和有创压力测量(FFRINV)得出的分流量储备(FFR)曲线评估病变特异性缺血:测量部位的重要性以及对患者进行有创冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的转诊的影响。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 Nov-Dec;12(6):480-492. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Fractional Flow Reserve in the Left Anterior Descending Artery.左前降支的血流储备分数
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 1;14(15):5429. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155429.
2
The Effect of Hydrostatic Pressure on Coronary Flow and Pressure-Based Indices of Coronary Stenosis Severity.静水压对冠状动脉血流及基于压力的冠状动脉狭窄严重程度指标的影响。
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 13;13(6):1649. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061649.
3
Updated Strategies in Non-Culprit Stenosis Management of Multivessel Coronary Disease-A Contemporary Review.多支血管病变非罪犯狭窄管理的更新策略:当代综述。

本文引用的文献

1
Limitations and Pitfalls of Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements and Adenosine-Induced Hyperemia.血流储备分数测量及腺苷诱导充血的局限性与陷阱
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2015 Oct;4(4):419-434. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 2;60(2):263. doi: 10.3390/medicina60020263.
4
Impact of height difference between coronary ostium and location of intracoronary pressure sensor on fractional flow reserve measurements.冠状动脉口与冠状动脉内压力传感器位置之间高度差对血流储备分数测量的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 24;18(8):e0289646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289646. eCollection 2023.
5
Coronary Tortuosity as a New Phenotype for Ischemia without Coronary Artery Disease.冠状动脉迂曲作为无冠状动脉疾病缺血的一种新表型。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022 Dec;119(6):883-890. doi: 10.36660/abc.20210787.
6
Comparison Between 5- and 1-Year Outcomes Using Cutoff Values of Pressure Drop Coefficient and Fractional Flow Reserve for Diagnosing Coronary Artery Diseases.使用压降系数和血流储备分数临界值诊断冠状动脉疾病的5年和1年结果比较
Front Physiol. 2021 Jul 14;12:689517. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.689517. eCollection 2021.
7
Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2020: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.《核医学杂志》2020 年心血管影像学回顾:正电子发射断层扫描、计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 Oct;28(5):2100-2111. doi: 10.1007/s12350-021-02685-9. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
8
Fractional flow reserve as the standard of reference: All that glistens is not gold.作为参考标准的血流储备分数:闪光的未必都是金子。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 Aug;27(4):1314-1316. doi: 10.1007/s12350-019-01771-3. Epub 2019 Jun 7.