Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Hans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
J Telemed Telecare. 2020 Aug-Sep;26(7-8):474-481. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19843753. Epub 2019 May 2.
Neonatal homecare (NH) can be used to provide parents the opportunity of bringing cardiopulmonary-stable preterm infants home for tube feeding and the establishment of breastfeeding supported by neonatal nurses visiting the home. However, home visits can be challenging for hospitals covering large regions, and, therefore, regular neonatal hospital care has remained the first choice in Denmark. As an alternative to home visits, telehealth may be used to deliver NH. Thus, neonatal tele-homecare (NTH) was developed. Positive infant outcomes and the optimization of family-centred care have been described, but the costs of telehealth in the context of NH remain unknown. This study aims to assess the costs of NTH compared to regular neonatal hospital care, from the health service perspective.
The cost analysis was based on an observational study of NTH in Denmark (run from November 2015 to December 2016) and followed the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards. The intervention group were the families of preterm infants receiving NTH ( = 96). The control group comprised a historic cohort of families with preterm infants, receiving standard care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) ( = 278). NTH infants and the historical group were categorized according to gestational age at birth at/under and over 32 weeks. The outcomes were NTH resource utilization, in-NICU hospital bed days, re-admissions and total costs on average per infant. The time horizon was from birth to discharge.
The costs of NTH resource utilization were, on average, €695 per infant, and the total costs per infant, on average, were €12,200 and €4200 for infants at/under and over 32 weeks, respectively. The corresponding costs of the control group were €14,300 and €4400. The difference in total costs showed statistical significance for the group of infants under 32 weeks ( < 0.001).
The cost analysis showed that NTH was less costly compared to regular hospital care, especially for infants born with gestational age at/under 32 weeks. NTH is an appropriate model of care for preterm infants and their families, is clinically effective and less expensive than similar services delivered in the hospital.
新生儿家庭护理(NH)可以为父母提供机会,让心肺稳定的早产儿在家中接受管饲,并在新生儿护士家访的支持下建立母乳喂养。然而,对于覆盖大片区域的医院来说,家访可能具有挑战性,因此,定期新生儿医院护理仍然是丹麦的首选。作为家访的替代方案,远程医疗可用于提供 NH。因此,开发了新生儿远程家庭护理(NTH)。已经描述了积极的婴儿结果和优化的以家庭为中心的护理,但 NH 背景下远程医疗的成本仍然未知。本研究旨在从卫生服务角度评估 NTH 与常规新生儿医院护理的成本。
成本分析基于丹麦 NTH 的观察性研究(2015 年 11 月至 2016 年 12 月进行),并遵循了综合健康经济评估报告标准。干预组为接受 NTH 的早产儿家庭(n=96)。对照组由在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)接受标准护理的早产儿家庭组成(n=278)。NTH 婴儿和历史组根据出生时的胎龄分为 32 周及以下和 32 周以上。结果是 NTH 资源利用、NICU 住院天数、再入院率和平均每个婴儿的总费用。时间范围是从出生到出院。
NTH 资源利用的平均成本为每个婴儿 695 欧元,平均每个婴儿的总费用分别为 12200 欧元和 4200 欧元,32 周及以下和 32 周以上的婴儿。对照组的相应费用分别为 14300 欧元和 4400 欧元。32 周以下组的总费用差异具有统计学意义(<0.001)。
成本分析表明,与常规医院护理相比,NTH 的成本更低,特别是对于胎龄为 32 周及以下的婴儿。NTH 是一种适合早产儿及其家庭的护理模式,具有临床效果,并且比在医院提供的类似服务成本更低。