• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解剖部位标记物:马耳他放射技师对其使用情况的评估

Anatomic Site Markers: Evaluation of Their Use among Maltese Radiographers.

作者信息

Attard Stephanie, Couto Jose G, MacKay Stuart, Zarb Francis

机构信息

Radiotherapy Department, Sir Anthony Mamo Oncology Center, Msida, Malta.

Department of Radiography, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.

出版信息

J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2017 Mar;48(1):30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmir.2016.08.006
PMID:31047207
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the perception and 5-year application of anatomic side markers (ASMs) by radiographers in Malta.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Phase 1 involved a longitudinal, retrospective observation of a stratified sample of radiographs over 5 years, using a self-designed data record sheet to record features of the placement of ASMs. Phase 2 consisted of a cross-sectional, prospective self-designed questionnaire evaluating the radiographers' perception on the use of ASMs in professional practice.

RESULTS

In phase 1, radiographs (n = 500) were selected from 234,105 taken over the 5-year period (error: ±4.38%; 95% confidence level). Four hundred thirty radiographs (86%) had evidence of markers, of which 110 (25.6%) had a pre-exposure marker and 320 (74.4%) had a postprocessed marker. The remaining 14% had no evidence of any markers. Two hundred eighty two (56.4%) of the radiographs had ASMs placed according to recommended guidelines by Ballinger, Frank, and Merrill. In phase 2, most radiographers (84.6%) preferred using postprocessing markers, with 15.4% preferring pre-exposure markers (76.6% of radiographers found applying pre-exposure markers time consuming). Sixty percent (60.5%) of radiographers gave correct answers on use of markers as recommended in the guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiographer preference in using postprocessing markers was evident, while the use of pre-exposure markers was seen to be influenced by time of examination, projection executed, and patient positioning. Radiographer awareness and continuous training are recommended.

摘要

目的

评估马耳他放射技师对解剖学侧方标记(ASMs)的认知及5年应用情况。

方法与材料

第一阶段对分层抽样的X线片进行了为期5年的纵向回顾性观察,使用自行设计的数据记录表记录ASMs放置的特征。第二阶段包括一项横断面、前瞻性的自行设计问卷,评估放射技师在专业实践中对ASMs使用的认知。

结果

在第一阶段,从5年期间拍摄的234,105张X线片中选取了500张(误差:±4.38%;95%置信水平)。430张X线片(86%)有标记证据,其中110张(25.6%)有曝光前标记,320张(74.4%)有后处理标记。其余14%没有任何标记的证据。282张(56.4%)X线片的ASMs放置符合Ballinger、Frank和Merrill推荐的指南。在第二阶段,大多数放射技师(84.6%)更喜欢使用后处理标记,15.4%更喜欢曝光前标记(76.6%的放射技师认为应用曝光前标记耗时)。60.5%的放射技师对指南中推荐的标记使用给出了正确答案。

结论

放射技师明显更倾向于使用后处理标记,而曝光前标记的使用似乎受检查时间、执行的投照和患者体位的影响。建议提高放射技师的认知并持续进行培训。

相似文献

1
Anatomic Site Markers: Evaluation of Their Use among Maltese Radiographers.解剖部位标记物:马耳他放射技师对其使用情况的评估
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2017 Mar;48(1):30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
2
The lateral wrist radiograph - To retake or not to retake.腕关节外侧X线片——是否需要重新拍摄
Radiography (Lond). 2023 Jan;29(1):119-123. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.10.013. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
3
A Study of Student Radiographers' Learning Experiences in Imaging Obese Patients.放射学专业学生对肥胖患者进行成像检查的学习体验研究。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2015 Sep;46(3S):S61-S68.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
4
Detection of incidental adrenal nodules on computed tomography by radiographers.放射技师在计算机断层扫描中偶然发现肾上腺结节。
Radiography (Lond). 2022 Nov;28(4):1025-1031. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
5
Characterization of radiographers' mammography practice in five European countries: a pilot study.五个欧洲国家放射技师乳腺摄影实践的特征:一项试点研究。
Insights Imaging. 2019 Mar 13;10(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0711-0.
6
The influence of a continuing education program on the image interpretation accuracy of rural radiographers.继续教育项目对农村放射技师影像判读准确性的影响。
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Apr-Jun;9(2):1145. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
7
To keep or reject, that is the question - A survey on radiologists and radiographers' assessments of plain radiography images.保留还是拒收,这是个问题——一项关于放射科医生和放射技师对普通X线摄影图像评估的调查。
Radiography (Lond). 2021 Feb;27(1):115-119. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.06.020. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
The Use of Digital Side Markers (DSMs) and Cropping in Digital Radiography.数字侧方标记(DSM)及裁剪在数字放射摄影中的应用
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2019 Jun;50(2):234-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2018.11.001. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
9
Accuracy of radiographer comment following a two-month experiential and blended learning in appendicular skeleton X-ray interpretation: The Singapore experience.在经历了两个月的经验学习和混合学习后,放射技师对四肢骨骼 X 射线解读的评论的准确性:新加坡的经验。
Radiography (Lond). 2021 Feb;27(1):43-47. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
10
Accuracy of radiographers red dot or triage of accident and emergency radiographs in clinical practice: a systematic review.放射技师对急诊X光片的红点标注或分诊在临床实践中的准确性:一项系统综述
Clin Radiol. 2006 Jul;61(7):604-15. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.01.015.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Anesthesia Effect of Brachial Plexus Block Based on Smart Electronic Medical Ultrasound-Guided Positioning and Traditional Anatomical Positioning.基于智能电子医疗超声引导定位与传统解剖定位的臂丛神经阻滞的麻醉效果比较。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Feb 25;2021:6676610. doi: 10.1155/2021/6676610. eCollection 2021.
2
A clinical audit of anatomical side marker use in a pediatric medical imaging department: A quantitative and qualitative investigation.小儿医学影像科解剖侧标使用的临床审核:定量与定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 24;15(11):e0242594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242594. eCollection 2020.