Glaucoma Division, Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
J Glaucoma. 2019 May;28(5):404-410. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001135.
Evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP) control in combined Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) implantation and trabeculectomy revision with adjunctive antimetabolite compared with AGV alone in patients who failed prior trabeculectomy.
Consecutive cases of combined AGV implantation and trabeculectomy revision with adjunctive antimetabolite (combined group) after January 3, 2014 were case-matched to cases of AGV implantation alone (AGV-alone group) before January 3, 2014. Primary outcome measures were qualified success with stratified IOP targets based on criteria: (A) IOP≤18 mm Hg and 20% IOP reduction; (B) IOP≤15 mm Hg and 25% IOP reduction; (C) IOP≤12 mm Hg and 30% IOP reduction, and hypertensive phase (HP) rate. Secondary outcome measures were 1-year postoperative IOP and number of glaucoma medications and complications.
Twenty eyes (20 patients) in each group were included. Cumulative success for combined group and AGV-alone group at 1-year were: 74.0% versus 59.2% (criterion A, P=0.221), 61.9% versus 49.5% (B, P=0.183), and 54.2% versus 30.0% (C, P=0.033), respectively. In total, 50% (10 eyes) in the AGV-alone group developed HP compared with 15% (3 eyes) in the combined group (P=0.041). At 1-year follow-up, combined group had statistically significantly lower IOP than AGV-alone group (10.1±4.4, 13.3±2.9 mm Hg, respectively; P=0.028). There were no cases of bleb-related infections, choroidal effusion or hemorrhage, persistent hypotony, or hypotony maculopathy in either group.
Combining AGV implantation with trabeculectomy revision with antimetabolite was associated with better tonometric success compared with AGV implantation alone in patients with previously failed trabeculectomy, particularly when a low IOP target (≤12 mm Hg) is required. Revised trabeculectomy may provide complimentary outflow facility to AGV.
评估在先前小梁切除术失败的患者中,与单独使用 Ahmed Glaucoma Valve(AGV)相比,联合使用抗代谢药物的 AGV 植入和小梁切除术修正术的眼内压(IOP)控制效果。
连续的在 2014 年 1 月 3 日后进行的联合 AGV 植入和小梁切除术修正术(联合组)病例与 2014 年 1 月 3 日前进行的单独 AGV 植入术(AGV 单独组)病例相匹配。主要观察指标为基于以下标准的有条件的成功:(A)IOP≤18mmHg 且 IOP 降低 20%;(B)IOP≤15mmHg 且 IOP 降低 25%;(C)IOP≤12mmHg 且 IOP 降低 30%,以及高血压期(HP)发生率。次要观察指标为术后 1 年的 IOP、降眼压药物的数量和并发症。
每组均纳入 20 只眼(20 例)。联合组和 AGV 单独组在 1 年时的累积成功率分别为:74.0%比 59.2%(标准 A,P=0.221),61.9%比 49.5%(标准 B,P=0.183)和 54.2%比 30.0%(标准 C,P=0.033)。AGV 单独组中 50%(10 只眼)发生了 HP,而联合组中仅 15%(3 只眼)发生了 HP(P=0.041)。在术后 1 年的随访中,联合组的 IOP 显著低于 AGV 单独组(分别为 10.1±4.4mmHg 和 13.3±2.9mmHg;P=0.028)。两组均无与滤过泡相关的感染、脉络膜渗漏或出血、持续性低眼压或低眼压性黄斑病变。
与单独使用 AGV 植入术相比,在先前小梁切除术失败的患者中,联合使用抗代谢药物的 AGV 植入和小梁切除术修正术与眼压控制效果更好,尤其是在需要低眼压目标(≤12mmHg)的情况下。修正的小梁切除术可能为 AGV 提供补充的房水流出通道。