Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.
Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Aug;276(8):2237-2241. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05446-0. Epub 2019 May 2.
The pre-lacrimal window approach (PLWA) is a promising technique in approaching lesions of the anterior wall and floor of the maxillary sinus. Simmen et al. previously reported that this approach is feasible in only 2/3 of their patients. This percentage appears to be lower than that of our local (mainly Chinese) population based on our clinical experience. Our study aims to measure the distance between the anterior maxillary wall and lacrimal duct in ethnic Chinese. A higher incidence of sphenoid-ethmoidal cells has been reported in Orientals. We postulate that there is also a higher incidence of wider pre-lacrimal recesses in Orientals thus making the PLWA more feasible to perform in Orientals.
100 consecutive sinus CT scans of adult patients with various rhinologic diseases that did not distort the bony anatomy of the maxilla were reviewed (2 sides each). The distance between the anterior maxillary wall and the anterior border of the lacrimal duct was measured in 200 sides. We have adopted the methodology of measurements previously published by Simmen et al. This is so that we could compare between Oriental and Occidental paranasal sinuses.
A distance of more than 7 mm was found in 39.5% of our subjects and a distance of > 3-7 mm was seen in 53.5%. In 6.5% of our subjects we found a prelacrimal recess < 3 mm.
The PLWA could have been performed without removal of the bony lacrimal canal in 39.5% of our subjects ( > 7 mm). Good access to the anterior maxilla wall could also have been possible for 53.5% with sub-periosteal removal of the bony lacrimal canal and medial maxillary wall. Thus, the PLWA would have been feasible for 93% of our subjects. These percentages are significantly higher than Simmen's study of 68.5% in an Occidental population.
泪前窗入路(PLWA)是一种有前途的方法,可用于接近上颌窦前壁和底壁的病变。Simmen 等人之前报告说,这种方法在他们的患者中只有 2/3 是可行的。根据我们的临床经验,这一比例似乎低于我们的本地(主要是中国人)人群。我们的研究旨在测量汉族人群的上颌前壁与泪小管之间的距离。据报道,东方人的蝶筛窦细胞发生率较高。我们推测,东方人的泪前隐窝也更宽,因此 PLWA 在东方人中更可行。
对 100 例患有各种鼻科疾病的成人患者的连续鼻窦 CT 扫描进行了回顾性研究(每侧 200 例),这些患者的鼻窦 CT 扫描没有使上颌骨的骨解剖结构变形。测量了 200 侧上颌前壁与泪小管前缘之间的距离。我们采用了 Simmen 等人之前发表的测量方法。这样我们就可以将东方人和西方人鼻窦之间进行比较。
我们的研究对象中有 39.5%的人距离超过 7mm,53.5%的人距离在 3-7mm 之间。在我们的研究对象中,有 6.5%的人发现泪前隐窝<3mm。
在我们的研究对象中,有 39.5%(>7mm)的人可以不切除骨性泪小管而行 PLWA。如果通过骨膜下切除骨性泪小管和内侧上颌骨壁,也有可能为 53.5%的人提供良好的上颌前壁通道。因此,PLWA 在我们的研究对象中可行率为 93%。这些百分比明显高于 Simmen 等人在西方人人群中的 68.5%的研究结果。