• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于呼吸道病毒 PCR 的抗生素降阶梯管理策略的实施。

Implementation of a Stewardship Initiative on Respiratory Viral PCR-based Antibiotic Deescalation.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic Avon Hospital, Avon, Ohio.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2019 Jun;39(6):709-717. doi: 10.1002/phar.2268. Epub 2019 May 20.

DOI:10.1002/phar.2268
PMID:31049983
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Respiratory viral polymerase chain reaction (RV PCR) tests assist in rapidly identifying viral pathogens and differentiating viral versus bacterial causes of pneumonia. Studies evaluating the use of RV PCR tests on antibiotic use in adults have demonstrated mixed results. We implemented an antimicrobial stewardship (ASP) intervention for patients with a positive RV PCR test result who were receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics and aimed to assess the impact on antibiotic usage.

METHODS

Retrospective quasi-experimental study of adult hospitalized patients comparing time to antibiotic deescalation, duration of antibiotic therapy, and antiviral use preintervention (January-March 2016) and postintervention (January-March 2017).

RESULTS

Of 172 ASP alerts reviewed, 55 (32%) were considered actionable. Of these, 47% of interventions were accepted. No significant difference was observed in median time to antibiotic deescalation (pre: 2.7 days vs post: 2.3 days, p=0.88). Time to discontinuation of antimicrobial therapy pre- and postintervention was reduced from 4 to 1.9 days (p=0.057) for piperacillin-tazobactam, from 2.7 to 1.8 days (p=0.75) for ceftriaxone, and from 3.6 to 2 days (p=0.4) for levofloxacin, respectively. Time to initiation of oseltamivir for influenza was significantly shorter in the postintervention group (pre: 11.3 hrs vs post: 3.6 hrs, p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

A third of patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics with a positive RV PCR had an opportunity for antimicrobial optimization, although this did not translate into a significant impact on the time to antibiotic deescalation or overall antibiotic use. Combination of RV PCR results with biomarkers to rule out bacterial coinfections and chest radiographic findings may help enhance the likelihood of accepted antibiotic deescalation recommendations and represents an area of future research.

摘要

目的

呼吸道病毒聚合酶链反应(RV PCR)检测有助于快速识别病毒病原体,并区分病毒性肺炎与细菌性肺炎。评估 RV PCR 检测在成人抗生素使用中的应用的研究结果不一。我们针对 RV PCR 检测结果阳性且正在接受广谱抗生素治疗的患者实施了一项抗菌药物管理(ASP)干预,并旨在评估其对抗生素使用的影响。

方法

回顾性准实验研究,比较了干预前(2016 年 1 月至 3 月)和干预后(2017 年 1 月至 3 月)接受 RV PCR 检测结果阳性且正在接受广谱抗生素治疗的成年住院患者的抗生素降级时间、抗生素治疗持续时间和抗病毒药物使用情况。

结果

在审查的 172 项 ASP 警报中,55 项(32%)被认为具有可操作性。其中,47%的干预措施被接受。抗生素降级时间的中位数无显著差异(干预前:2.7 天 vs 干预后:2.3 天,p=0.88)。干预前后,哌拉西林他唑巴坦的抗菌药物治疗停药时间从 4 天缩短至 1.9 天(p=0.057),头孢曲松从 2.7 天缩短至 1.8 天(p=0.75),左氧氟沙星从 3.6 天缩短至 2 天(p=0.4)。流感患者使用奥司他韦的起始时间在干预后组显著缩短(干预前:11.3 小时 vs 干预后:3.6 小时,p=0.02)。

结论

尽管三分之一的 RV PCR 检测结果阳性且正在接受广谱抗生素治疗的患者有机会进行抗菌药物优化,但这并未显著影响抗生素降级时间或总体抗生素使用。将 RV PCR 检测结果与生物标志物相结合以排除细菌合并感染和胸部 X 线检查结果,可能有助于提高接受抗生素降级建议的可能性,这是未来研究的一个领域。

相似文献

1
Implementation of a Stewardship Initiative on Respiratory Viral PCR-based Antibiotic Deescalation.基于呼吸道病毒 PCR 的抗生素降阶梯管理策略的实施。
Pharmacotherapy. 2019 Jun;39(6):709-717. doi: 10.1002/phar.2268. Epub 2019 May 20.
2
Effects of an automatic discontinuation of antibiotics policy: A novel approach to antimicrobial stewardship.抗生素自动停药政策的效果:一种新的抗菌药物管理方法。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Sep 1;76(Supplement_3):S85-S90. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz144.
3
Combining Procalcitonin and Rapid Multiplex Respiratory Virus Testing for Antibiotic Stewardship in Older Adult Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Infection.降钙素原与快速多重呼吸道病毒检测联合用于老年重症急性呼吸道感染患者的抗生素管理。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jan;21(1):62-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.020. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
4
Differences in antibiotic and antiviral use in people with confirmed influenza: a retrospective comparison of rapid influenza PCR and multiplex respiratory virus PCR tests.确诊流感患者中抗生素和抗病毒药物使用的差异:快速流感 PCR 和多重呼吸道病毒 PCR 检测的回顾性比较。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 7;21(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06030-w.
5
Impact of a Carbapenem Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Patient Outcomes.碳青霉烯类抗菌药物管理计划对患者结局的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Aug 24;61(9). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00736-17. Print 2017 Sep.
6
Impact of Penicillin Allergy on Empirical Carbapenem Use in Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections: An Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunity.青霉素过敏对革兰氏阴性菌血流感染经验性碳青霉烯类药物使用的影响:一个抗菌药物管理机会。
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Jan;38(1):42-50. doi: 10.1002/phar.2054. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
7
Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship initiative on time to administration of empirical antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients with bacteremia.抗菌药物管理倡议对菌血症住院患者经验性抗生素治疗给药时间的影响。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017 Apr 1;74(7):511-519. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160096.
8
Improving care for critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia.改善社区获得性肺炎重症患者的护理。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Jun 3;76(12):861-868. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz068.
9
Frequency of empiric antibiotic de-escalation in an acute care hospital with an established Antimicrobial Stewardship Program.在一家设有抗菌药物管理项目的急症医院中经验性抗生素降阶梯治疗的频率。
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 12;16(1):751. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2080-3.
10
Impact of Procalcitonin Guidance with an Educational Program on Management of Adults Hospitalized with Pneumonia.降钙素原指导联合教育方案对肺炎住院成人管理的影响。
Am J Med. 2018 Feb;131(2):201.e1-201.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.08.039. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging diagnostic stewardship within antimicrobial stewardship programmes.在抗菌药物管理计划中利用诊断管理
Drugs Context. 2023 Feb 20;12. doi: 10.7573/dic.2022-9-5. eCollection 2023.
2
Core Elements for Implementing Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Korean General Hospitals.韩国综合医院实施抗菌药物管理计划的核心要素。
Infect Chemother. 2022 Dec;54(4):637-673. doi: 10.3947/ic.2022.0171.
3
Respiratory Tract Infections and Laboratory Diagnostic Methods: A Review with A Focus on Syndromic Panel-Based Assays.呼吸道感染与实验室诊断方法:聚焦基于综合征检测板检测的综述
Microorganisms. 2022 Sep 16;10(9):1856. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10091856.
4
Value of syndromic panels in the management of severe community-acquired pneumonia.症候群检测套组在严重社区获得性肺炎治疗上的价值。
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2022 Apr;35 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):15-20. doi: 10.37201/req/s01.03.2022. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
5
Impact of multiplexed respiratory viral panels on infection control measures and antimicrobial stewardship: a review of the literature.多重呼吸道病毒检测panel 对感染控制措施和抗菌药物管理的影响:文献综述。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Feb;41(2):187-202. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04375-3. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
6
Syndromic diagnostic testing: a new way to approach patient care in the treatment of infectious diseases.症状诊断检测:一种在传染病治疗中对待患者的新方法。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Sep 23;76(Suppl 3):iii4-iii11. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab245.
7
Syndromic Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (mPCR) Testing and Antimicrobial Stewardship: Current Practice and Future Directions.综合征多重聚合酶链反应(mPCR)检测与抗菌药物管理:当前实践与未来方向
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2021;23(4):5. doi: 10.1007/s11908-021-00748-z. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
8
Molecular Testing for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections: Clinical and Diagnostic Recommendations From the IDSA's Diagnostics Committee.急性呼吸道感染的分子检测:来自 IDSA 诊断委员会的临床和诊断建议。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;71(10):2744-2751. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa508.
9
Appropriate Use and Future Directions of Molecular Diagnostic Testing.分子诊断检测的合理应用及未来发展方向
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2020 Feb 6;22(2):5. doi: 10.1007/s11908-020-0714-5.
10
Use of Procalcitonin and a Respiratory Polymerase Chain Reaction Panel to Reduce Antibiotic Use via an Electronic Medical Record Alert.降钙素原和呼吸聚合酶链反应联合检测在电子病历预警下减少抗生素使用的临床研究
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 23;71(7):1684-1689. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1042.