Department of Infection Control, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Feb;41(2):187-202. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04375-3. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
Multiplexed respiratory viral panels (MRVP) have recently been added to the diagnostic work-up of respiratory infections. This review provides a summary of the main literature of MRVP for patients with regard to 3 different topics. Can the results of MRVP reduce the inappropriate use of antibiotics, can they guide the use of appropriate antiviral therapy and do they have an added value with respect to infection control measures? Literature was searched for based on a defined search string using both the PubMed and Embase database. Twenty-five articles report on the impact of MRVP on antibiotic therapy. In all the articles where active antimicrobial stewardship was performed (e.g., education/advice on interpreting results of MRVP) (N = 9), a reduction in antibiotic therapy was shown (with exception of 2 studies). Three studies evaluating the effect of MRVP on antimicrobial use in a population that is not suspected of having bacterial pneumonia (e.g., absence of radiology suggestive for bacterial infection or low PCT) found a positive impact on antibiotic therapy. Eight studies with a short TAT (< 7 h) had a positive impact on use of antibiotic therapy. Eleven studies focused on the impact of MRVP on antiviral use. In contrast to antibiotic reduction, all studies systematically objectified improved antiviral use as a consequence of MRVP results. With regard to the impact of MRVP on infection control, eleven articles were withheld. All these studies led to a more accurate use of infection control measures by detecting unidentified pathogens or stopping isolation precautions in case of a negative MRVP result. MRVP don't reduce antibiotic therapy in all populations. Reduction seems more likely if the following factors are present: active antimicrobial stewardship, low likelihood of a bacterial infection, and a short turnaround time to result. With respect to antiviral therapy, all studies have an impact but the targeted use of antivirals is so far not that evidence based for all viral respiratory pathogens. Regarding infection control measures, the potential impact of MRVP is high because of the need of additional isolation precautions for many respiratory viruses, although logistical problems can occur.
多重呼吸道病毒检测 panel(MRVP)最近已被纳入呼吸道感染的诊断程序。这篇综述主要针对三个不同的主题,对 MRVP 检测在呼吸道感染患者中的应用进行了文献回顾。MRVP 的检测结果能否减少抗生素的不合理使用?能否指导应用合适的抗病毒药物治疗?以及对于感染控制措施是否具有额外的价值?文献检索基于明确的检索词,使用 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库。有 25 篇文章报道了 MRVP 对抗生素治疗的影响。在所有进行了积极的抗菌药物管理的文章中(例如,对 MRVP 检测结果进行解读的教育/建议)(N=9),都显示出抗生素治疗的减少(有 2 项研究除外)。三项研究评估了 MRVP 在疑似细菌性肺炎(例如,无放射学提示细菌感染或低降钙素原)患者人群中对抗菌药物使用的影响,发现其对抗生素治疗有积极影响。8 项检测时间短(<7 小时)的研究对抗生素治疗有积极影响。11 项研究重点关注 MRVP 对抗病毒药物使用的影响。与抗生素减少相反,所有研究都系统地将抗病毒药物使用的改善作为 MRVP 检测结果的结果。关于 MRVP 对感染控制的影响,有 11 篇文章被排除。所有这些研究通过检测未识别的病原体或在 MRVP 检测结果为阴性时停止隔离预防措施,使感染控制措施的使用更加准确。MRVP 并不能在所有人群中减少抗生素的使用。如果存在以下因素,减少的可能性更大:积极的抗菌药物管理、低细菌性感染的可能性以及检测结果的快速周转时间。关于抗病毒治疗,所有研究都有影响,但目前针对所有病毒性呼吸道病原体,抗病毒药物的靶向应用还没有那么有依据。关于感染控制措施,由于需要对许多呼吸道病毒采取额外的隔离预防措施,尽管可能会出现后勤问题,但 MRVP 的潜在影响仍然很大。