Kingstone Lysa Legault, Shabana Wael, Chakraborty Santanu, Kingstone Michael, Nguyen Thanh, Thornhill Rebecca E, Berthiaume Alain, Chatelain Robert, Currie Geoffrey
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; School of Dentistry and Health Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, Australia.
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2015 Mar;46(1):90-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
Imaging plaque morphology, in addition to luminal grading, may improve stroke risk-management by identifying structural atherosclerotic plaques alterations responsible for cerebrovascular events. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the agreement between our enhanced ultrasound (US) imaging method and high-resolution cross-sectional imaging modalities, such as multidetector-row computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in the characterization of vulnerable plaques.
Sixty tissue-like phantoms were created to simulate various types of diseased plaque segments. We prospectively assessed each sample with US, CT, and MRI. Plaque characteristics considered included surface irregularity, ulceration, fissure, and presence of internal fluid core(s). We evaluated the agreement between and among the three modalities, as well as the accuracy of each compared with the true pathology.
There was moderate to substantial agreement among the three modalities in the detection of morphologic characteristics. There was no significant difference in accuracy between US and CT in the presence of ulceration(s) (P = .23), lucency (P = .23), or fissures (P = .07); however, US was significantly more accurate than MRI for each of these characteristics (P = .0001, P = .0001, P = .02, respectively). None of the three modalities did display any significant difference in accuracy in the identification of irregular surface. There was substantial agreement among the three radiologists (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.74) in their assessment of plaque subtype, ranging from 80%-85% accuracy in identifying the plaque subtypes for each classification.
Enhanced plaque imaging can identify potentially significant plaque characteristics and provide insight into early causative conditions of carotid atherosclerosis. Our results suggest that the types of plaque pathologies derived from our US method showed good agreement with CT and surpass information gathered on MRI. This imaging protocol could potentially shift the paradigm in early carotid plaque imaging likely to predict the onset of vulnerable plaques, thus improving preventative management of atherosclerosis.
除管腔分级外,对斑块形态进行成像,通过识别导致脑血管事件的结构性动脉粥样硬化斑块改变,可能会改善中风风险管理。本研究的目的是评估我们的增强超声(US)成像方法与高分辨率横断面成像模式(如多排探测器计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI))在易损斑块特征描述方面的一致性。
制作60个组织样模型,以模拟各种类型的病变斑块节段。我们前瞻性地用超声、CT和MRI对每个样本进行评估。考虑的斑块特征包括表面不规则、溃疡、裂隙以及内部液性核心的存在。我们评估了三种模式之间的一致性,以及每种模式与真实病理相比的准确性。
在形态学特征检测方面,三种模式之间存在中度到高度一致性。在存在溃疡(P = 0.23)、透亮区(P = 0.23)或裂隙(P = 0.07)时,超声和CT在准确性上无显著差异;然而,对于这些特征中的每一个,超声都比MRI显著更准确(分别为P = 0.0001、P = 0.0001、P = 0.02)。三种模式在识别不规则表面的准确性上均未显示出任何显著差异。三位放射科医生在斑块亚型评估方面存在高度一致性(组内相关系数,0.61;95%置信区间,0.46 - 0.74),在识别每种分类的斑块亚型时,准确性范围为80% - 85%。
增强斑块成像可以识别潜在的重要斑块特征,并深入了解颈动脉粥样硬化的早期病因情况。我们的结果表明,我们的超声方法得出的斑块病理类型与CT显示出良好的一致性,并且优于MRI收集的信息。这种成像方案可能会改变早期颈动脉斑块成像的模式,有可能预测易损斑块的发生,从而改善动脉粥样硬化的预防性管理。