From the Department of Pharmacy Practice, Regis University School of Pharmacy, Denver, Colorado.
Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, AAADRS Clinical Research Center, Coral Gables, Florida.
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Jul 3;40(4):221-229. doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4226. Epub 2019 May 3.
Approximately two-thirds of people with asthma have some evidence of allergy; their condition differs from nonallergic asthma in terms of predominant symptoms and clinical outcomes. To compare asthma control and medication use among patients with persistent asthma with evidence of allergy (PA-EA) and patients with persistent asthma with no evidence of allergy (PA-NEA). A retrospective analysis of survey responses and medication claims data from the Observational Study of Asthma Control and Outcomes study, a prospective survey linked to retrospective claims-based analysis of patients ages ≥ 12 years with persistent asthma in a U.S. health maintenance organization. Evidence of allergy was defined as both a positive response to a survey question about hay fever and/or seasonal allergies and one or more medical diagnostic codes for atopic conditions. Regression models were used to compare asthma control (Asthma Control Questionnaire [ACQ] scores) and asthma medication use between PA-EA and PA-NEA. Adjusted data showed that, versus the patients with PA-NEA (n = 312), patients with PA-EA (n = 971) had higher (worse) 5-item and 6-item ACQ (ACQ-5 and ACQ-6) scores (by 0.34 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.24-0.44]; and 0.31 [95% CI, 0.21-0.40], respectively), were more likely to have poorly controlled asthma (ACQ-5 score ≥ 1.5: odds ratio 3.37 [95% CI, 2.07-5.50]; ACQ-6 score ≥ 1.5: odds ratio 3.46 [95% CI, 2.13-5.62]) and less likely to have well-controlled asthma (ACQ-5 score ≤ 0.75: odds ratio 0.21 [95% CI, 0.13-0.34]; ACQ-6 score ≤ 0.75: odds ratio 0.21 [95% CI, 0.13-0.35]). Patients with PA-EA also had greater asthma medication use, most notably 2.5 times more prescriptions of high-dose inhaled corticosteroid in a 4-month period (95% CI, 1.21-5.16) and 16.15 times higher odds of chronic oral corticosteroid use (95% CI, 1.50-174.09) versus PA-NEA. The patients with PA-EA versus PA-NEA had worse asthma control and greater medication use. These patients may need more vigilant clinical oversight and treatment management to ensure adequate asthma control.
约三分之二的哮喘患者有一定程度的过敏证据;其症状和临床结局与非过敏性哮喘不同。本研究旨在比较具有过敏证据的持续性哮喘患者(PA-EA)和无过敏证据的持续性哮喘患者(PA-NEA)的哮喘控制和药物使用情况。本研究是一项回顾性分析,纳入了来自 Observational Study of Asthma Control and Outcomes 研究的调查应答和药物使用数据,该研究为前瞻性调查,与美国医疗保健组织中≥12 岁持续性哮喘患者的基于回顾性索赔的分析相关。过敏证据定义为对花粉热和/或季节性过敏的调查问题有阳性反应,以及一个或多个特应性疾病的医疗诊断代码。使用回归模型比较 PA-EA 和 PA-NEA 之间的哮喘控制(哮喘控制问卷 [ACQ] 评分)和哮喘药物使用情况。调整数据显示,与 PA-NEA 患者(n=312)相比,PA-EA 患者(n=971)的 5 项和 6 项 ACQ(ACQ-5 和 ACQ-6)评分更高(差)(分别为 0.34[95%置信区间{CI},0.24-0.44]和 0.31[95%CI,0.21-0.40]),哮喘控制不佳的可能性更大(ACQ-5 评分≥1.5:比值比 3.37[95%CI,2.07-5.50];ACQ-6 评分≥1.5:比值比 3.46[95%CI,2.13-5.62]),而控制良好的可能性更小(ACQ-5 评分≤0.75:比值比 0.21[95%CI,0.13-0.34];ACQ-6 评分≤0.75:比值比 0.21[95%CI,0.13-0.35])。PA-EA 患者的哮喘药物使用也更多,尤其是在 4 个月内高剂量吸入性皮质类固醇处方增加了 2.5 倍(95%CI,1.21-5.16),慢性口服皮质类固醇使用的可能性增加了 16.15 倍(95%CI,1.50-174.09)。与 PA-NEA 相比,PA-EA 患者的哮喘控制更差,药物使用更多。这些患者可能需要更严格的临床监测和治疗管理,以确保充分的哮喘控制。