El-Rabbany Mohamed, Lam David K, Shah Prakesh S, Azarpazhooh Amir
Resident and PhD Student in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Professor and Chair, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Stony Brook School of Dental Medicine; Professor, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook School of Medicine; and Surgeon-Scientist, Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook, NY.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Sep;77(9):1816-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.03.040. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
Optimal management approaches for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) using either surgical or nonsurgical approaches remain inconclusive. Our objective was to compare the effects of surgical versus nonsurgical therapy on the resolution of MRONJ.
We conducted a retrospective review of eligible patients with a diagnosis of MRONJ at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, who either were seen in the outpatient clinic from January 2014 to December 2016 or received major surgical intervention from January 2011 to December 2016. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted to evaluate the effects of surgical therapy on disease resolution.
A total of 78 patients were included in this study. Of these, 56 (72%) received surgical therapy. Antiresorptive agents were being taken for the treatment of osteoporosis by 46 patients (82%) in the surgical group compared with 20 nonsurgical patients (91%) (P = .28). The median follow-up period was 15.5 months (interquartile range, 8.0 to 34.3 months) in the surgical group compared with 11.0 months (interquartile range, 8.0 to 20.5 months) in the nonsurgical group (P = .75). Disease resolution occurred in 39 surgical patients (70%) compared with 8 nonsurgical patients (36%). Surgical therapy was associated with disease resolution compared with nonsurgical therapy alone, after adjustment for age, duration of antiresorptive or antiangiogenic therapy, whether the antiresorptive or antiangiogenic agents were used for oncologic purposes, and the stage of MRONJ at initial presentation (adjusted odds ratio, 4.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.28 to 14.60).
Surgical therapy compared with nonsurgical therapy was associated with disease resolution in patients with MRONJ. High-quality evidence of the superiority of any specific surgical approach in the treatment of MRONJ is needed.
使用手术或非手术方法治疗药物性颌骨坏死(MRONJ)的最佳管理方法尚无定论。我们的目的是比较手术治疗与非手术治疗对MRONJ病情缓解的效果。
我们对加拿大安大略省多伦多市西奈山医院确诊为MRONJ的符合条件的患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者在2014年1月至2016年12月期间在门诊就诊,或在2011年1月至2016年12月期间接受了重大手术干预。进行多因素逻辑回归分析以评估手术治疗对疾病缓解的影响。
本研究共纳入78例患者。其中,56例(72%)接受了手术治疗。手术组46例(82%)患者正在服用抗吸收药物治疗骨质疏松症,而非手术组为20例(91%)(P = 0.28)。手术组的中位随访期为15.5个月(四分位间距,8.0至34.3个月),非手术组为11.0个月(四分位间距,8.0至20.5个月)(P = 0.75)。39例手术患者(70%)病情缓解,而非手术患者为8例(36%)。在调整年龄、抗吸收或抗血管生成治疗的持续时间、抗吸收或抗血管生成药物是否用于肿瘤治疗以及初次就诊时MRONJ的分期后,与单独的非手术治疗相比,手术治疗与疾病缓解相关(调整后的优势比,4.33;95%置信区间,1.28至14.60)。
与非手术治疗相比,手术治疗与MRONJ患者的疾病缓解相关。需要高质量的证据来证明任何特定手术方法在治疗MRONJ方面的优越性。