• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多支冠状动脉疾病中的冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮血运重建术的比较。

Coronary Bypass Versus Percutaneous Revascularization in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.

机构信息

Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Aug;108(2):474-480. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.02.064. Epub 2019 May 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.02.064
PMID:31056197
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study focused on contemporary outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD).

METHODS

This was a propensity-matched retrospective, observational analysis. Patients with MVCAD who underwent CABG or PCI between 2010 and 2018 and for whom data were available through the National Cardiovascular Data Registry or The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database were included. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included freedom from inpatient readmission and freedom from repeat revascularization.

RESULTS

Of the initial 6,163 patients with MVCAD, the propensity-matched cohort included 844 in each group. The estimated 1-year mortality was 11.5% and 7.2% (p < 0.001) in the PCI and CABG groups, respectively, with an overall hazard ratio for mortality of PCI versus CABG of 1.64 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 2.10; p < 0.001). The overall hazard ratio for readmission for PCI versus CABG was 1.42 (95% CI, 1.23 to 1.64; p < 0.001). The overall hazard ratio for repeat revascularization for PCI versus CABG was 4.06 (95% CI, 2.39 to 6.91; p < 0.001). Overall major adverse cardiovascular events and individual outcomes of mortality, readmission, and repeat revascularization all favored CABG across virtually all major clinical subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

This contemporary propensity-matched analysis of patients undergoing coronary revascularization for MVCAD demonstrates a significant mortality benefit with CABG over PCI, and this benefit is consistent across virtually all major patient subgroups. Futures studies are needed reflecting routine practice to assess how best to approach shared decision making and informed consent when it comes to revascularization decisions in any patient with MVCAD.

摘要

背景

本研究聚焦于多支血管冠状动脉疾病(MVCAD)患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的当代结局。

方法

这是一项倾向匹配的回顾性观察性分析。纳入 2010 年至 2018 年间接受 CABG 或 PCI 治疗且国家心血管数据注册中心或胸外科医师学会成人心脏外科学数据库中存在相关数据的 MVCAD 患者。主要结局为总体生存率。次要结局包括无住院再入院率和无重复血运重建率。

结果

在最初的 6163 例 MVCAD 患者中,倾向匹配队列中每组各有 844 例患者。PCI 组和 CABG 组的 1 年死亡率分别为 11.5%和 7.2%(p<0.001),PCI 与 CABG 的死亡率总体风险比为 1.64(95%置信区间,1.29 至 2.10;p<0.001)。PCI 与 CABG 的再入院总体风险比为 1.42(95%置信区间,1.23 至 1.64;p<0.001)。PCI 与 CABG 的重复血运重建总体风险比为 4.06(95%置信区间,2.39 至 6.91;p<0.001)。在几乎所有主要临床亚组中,CABG 在总体主要不良心血管事件和死亡率、再入院率及重复血运重建率等各单个结局上均优于 PCI。

结论

本项针对 MVCAD 患者行冠状动脉血运重建的当代倾向匹配分析表明,CABG 相较于 PCI 具有显著的死亡率获益,且该获益在几乎所有主要患者亚组中一致。未来需要进行反映常规实践的研究,以评估在任何 MVCAD 患者中进行血运重建决策时,如何最好地开展共同决策和知情同意。

相似文献

1
Coronary Bypass Versus Percutaneous Revascularization in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.多支冠状动脉疾病中的冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮血运重建术的比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Aug;108(2):474-480. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.02.064. Epub 2019 May 2.
2
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis (5-year outcomes of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术在需要透析的终末期肾病患者中的比较(CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG 登记研究队列-2 的 5 年结果)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.034. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
3
Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease: Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.多支冠状动脉疾病合并慢性肾脏病患者的血运重建:依维莫司洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Sep 15;66(11):1209-1220. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1334.
4
Everolimus-eluting stents or bypass surgery for multivessel coronary disease.依维莫司洗脱支架或旁路手术治疗多支冠状动脉疾病。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 26;372(13):1213-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412168. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
5
Improved long-term survival for diabetic patients with surgical versus interventional revascularization.手术与介入性血管重建术相比,糖尿病患者的长期生存率得到提高。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Apr;99(4):1298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.11.035. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
6
Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Severely Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左心室射血分数严重降低患者的长期预后
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):631-641. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0239.
7
Five-year outcomes of percutaneous versus surgical coronary revascularization in patients with diabetes mellitus (from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉血运重建与外科冠状动脉血运重建的五年结局(来自CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG注册队列2)
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 15;115(8):1063-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.544. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
8
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
9
Multiarterial grafts improve the rate of early major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in patients undergoing coronary revascularization: analysis of 12 615 patients with multivessel disease.多动脉旁路移植可改善多支血管病变患者冠状动脉血运重建术后早期主要心脏和脑血管不良事件的发生率:12615 例患者分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Oct 1;52(4):746-752. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx171.
10
Comparison of five-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with left ventricular ejection fractions≤50% versus >50% (from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).比较左心室射血分数≤50%与>50%的患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 5 年预后(来自 CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG 注册研究队列-2)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 1;114(7):988-96. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors and outcomes of conversion to sternotomy in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.微创冠状动脉旁路移植术中转为胸骨切开术的预测因素及结果
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2023 Apr 28;31(2):161-168. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2023.24552. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Time of coronary revascularization: methodology of a mediation analysis study.冠状动脉血运重建时间:中介分析研究方法。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Dec 13;10(4):E1052-E1058. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210183. Print 2022 Oct-Dec.
3
Commentary: Multiple hit model: Treating multivessel coronary disease and ischemic mitral regurgitation.
述评:多重打击模型:治疗多支冠状动脉疾病和缺血性二尖瓣反流
JTCVS Open. 2021 Jul 29;7:207-208. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.07.028. eCollection 2021 Sep.
4
Coronary revascularization outcomes in relation to skilled nursing facility use following hospital discharge.冠状动脉血运重建术后与出院后使用熟练护理设施的结果。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 May;44(5):627-635. doi: 10.1002/clc.23583. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
5
Revascularization following non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in multivessel coronary disease.多支冠状动脉疾病患者非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的血运重建
J Card Surg. 2020 Jun;35(6):1195-1201. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14539. Epub 2020 May 3.
6
The Impact of Sex on Outcomes After Revascularization for Multivessel Coronary Disease.性别对多支冠状动脉疾病血运重建治疗结局的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Oct;110(4):1243-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.026. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
7
Trends in Guideline-Driven Revascularization in Diabetic Patients with Multivessel Coronary Heart Disease.多支冠状动脉疾病糖尿病患者指南驱动的血运重建趋势
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2019 Nov 18;6(4):41. doi: 10.3390/jcdd6040041.