Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestr. 70, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Research Unit Radiation Cytogenetics, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Ingolstaedter-Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Dent Mater. 2019 Jul;35(7):963-969. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 May 2.
To assess the cytocompatibility of five commercially available xenogenic barrier membranes used for oral regenerative procedures and to determine the growth factor content of these membranes in-vitro.
Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) and immortalized periodontal ligament stem cells (PDL-hTERTs) were used to determine the cytocompatibility of xenogenic barrier membranes made of collagen (Biogide, BG, Geistlich Pharma AG, Switzerland; Biomend, BM, Zimmer Biomet, USA; Osseoguard OG, Zimmer Biomet, USA; OssixPlus, OX, Datum Dental, Israel) or extracellular matrix (ECM) (Dynamatrix, DM, Keystone Dental, USA) and of their eluates obtained by washing. Cells were cultured with previously washed and unwashed membranes (n=4) and in the medium used for washing (eluate). Cell proliferation at 3 days (eluates) and at 7 days (membranes) was assessed using the WST-1 cell proliferation kit. Growth factor content of the membranes was measured using multiplex ELISA.
The eluate of BG and BM significantly inhibited proliferation of hMSCs, whereas DM and OX showed stimulating effects. The highest impact was observed for DM, its eluate doubled the cell proliferation of adherent cells when compared to the control (p<0.001). The eluate of OG did not influence eluate cell cultures (p>0.05). The presence of membranes had different impact on hMSCs and PDLs. hMSCs seem to be more resistant to the inhibitory effects of BG, OG and BM. hMSCs are only affected by OX, which actually stimulates hMSCs when the specimens are not washed previously. PDLs however proliferate significantly less once they are placed into culture with BM and OG as well as BG-not washed. Once BG is washed no inhibitory effect on PDLs was observed, however overall the washing of membrane samples prior to the placement into the cell culture did hardly have any effect on the outcome. The strongest inhibition of proliferation was shown with the BM and OG membrane in PDL-hTERTs (p<0.001). Growth factor contents were quite similar quantitatively and qualitatively among the tested membranes with concentrations in the range of 50-500 pg/ml. Intriguingly DM contained considerably higher amounts of bFGF with up to 8000 pg/ml.
The collagen membranes cross-linked with aldehydes show poor outcomes in PDLs while the collagen membrane cross-linked with polysaccharides generally shows promising results similar to the ECM-membrane DM in both membrane and eluate tests. The findings may be due to various factors, especially differences observed in composition, processing and bFGF content.
评估五种市售异种屏障膜在口腔再生治疗中的细胞相容性,并在体外测定这些膜的生长因子含量。
采用人骨髓间充质干细胞(hMSCs)和永生化牙周膜干细胞(PDL-hTERTs),测定由胶原(Biogide,BG, Geistlich Pharma AG,瑞士;Biomend,BM, Zimmer Biomet,美国;Osseoguard OG, Zimmer Biomet,美国;OssixPlus,OX,Datum Dental,以色列)或细胞外基质(ECM)(Dynamatrix,DM,Keystone Dental,美国)制成的异种屏障膜及其洗脱液的细胞相容性。细胞分别与之前清洗和未清洗的膜(n=4)以及用于清洗的培养基(洗脱液)孵育。使用 WST-1 细胞增殖试剂盒在第 3 天(洗脱液)和第 7 天(膜)评估细胞增殖。使用多重 ELISA 测量膜的生长因子含量。
BG 和 BM 的洗脱液显著抑制 hMSCs 的增殖,而 DM 和 OX 则表现出刺激作用。DM 的影响最大,其洗脱液与对照组相比,使贴壁细胞的增殖增加了一倍(p<0.001)。OG 的洗脱液对洗脱液细胞培养没有影响(p>0.05)。膜的存在对 hMSCs 和 PDLs 有不同的影响。hMSCs 似乎对 BG、OG 和 BM 的抑制作用更具抵抗力。只有当标本未预先清洗时,OX 才会对 hMSCs 产生影响,实际上会刺激 hMSCs。然而,当将 PDLs 放入 BM 和 OG 以及 BG-未清洗的培养物中时,它们的增殖明显减少。BG 洗涤后,对 PDLs 没有观察到抑制作用,然而,在将膜样本放入细胞培养物之前进行洗涤几乎对结果没有影响。在 PDL-hTERTs 中,BM 和 OG 膜显示出最强的增殖抑制作用(p<0.001)。测试膜的生长因子含量在数量和质量上都非常相似,浓度在 50-500 pg/ml 范围内。有趣的是,DM 中含有相当高数量的 bFGF,高达 8000 pg/ml。
用醛交联的胶原膜在 PDLs 中表现不佳,而用多糖交联的胶原膜在膜和洗脱液测试中通常表现出与 ECM 膜 DM 相似的有前景的结果。这些发现可能是由于各种因素造成的,特别是观察到的组成、处理和 bFGF 含量的差异。