• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在哪里进行袖状胃切除术?对大型州内住院患者和门诊患者数据库的分析。

Where are sleeves performed? An analysis of inpatient versus outpatient databases in a large state.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, Texas.

Department of Surgery, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, Texas.

出版信息

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Jul;15(7):1066-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.002
PMID:31056409
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most common bariatric surgery in the United States today. There is a trend toward performing SG as an outpatient procedure, either in an ambulatory setting or as an outpatient at a larger hospital. The term "outpatient" is used to designate essentially any patient without an inpatient order. Texas maintains the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (IPUDF) database and the Texas Outpatient Public Use Data File (OPUDF) database for inpatient and outpatient settings, respectively.

OBJECTIVES

To determine where SGs are performed by evaluating the Texas IPUDF and OPUDF for 2016.

SETTING

University hospital, United States.

METHODS

The Texas IPUDF and OPUDF were searched with the Current Procedural Terminology code of 43775 and the International Classification of Diseases, 10 revision, procedure code of 0DB64Z3. Patient demographic characteristics were also examined. We looked at the top 5 diagnoses in each database.

RESULTS

Of the 16,855 SGs performed in Texas in 2016, outpatient SGs accounted for 31.0% (5227 cases), and inpatient SGs accounted for 69% of the total with 11,628 cases reported. For patients reported in the OPUDF, mean length of stay (LOS) was 2.1 (standard deviation 3.2) days with a median of 1.0 (interquartile range = 1, 2) days; for patients in the IPUDF, mean LOS was 1.6 (standard deviation 1.5) days, and the median was 1.0 (interquartile range = 1, 1) days.

CONCLUSION

A third of SGs in Texas were performed under outpatient status. Further study is needed to determine the safety of this practice.

摘要

背景

袖状胃切除术(SG)是当今美国最常见的减肥手术。目前有将 SG 作为门诊手术的趋势,无论是在门诊环境中还是在更大的医院进行门诊手术。“门诊”一词用于指定没有住院医嘱的任何患者。德克萨斯州维护着德克萨斯州住院公共使用数据文件(IPUDF)和德克萨斯州门诊公共使用数据文件(OPUDF),分别用于住院和门诊环境。

目的

通过评估 2016 年的德克萨斯州 IPUDF 和 OPUDF,确定 SG 的实施地点。

地点

美国大学医院。

方法

使用当前程序术语代码 43775 和国际疾病分类,第 10 修订版,程序代码 0DB64Z3,分别对德克萨斯州的 IPUDF 和 OPUDF 进行搜索。还检查了患者的人口统计学特征。我们查看了每个数据库中排名前 5 的诊断。

结果

2016 年在德克萨斯州进行的 16855 例 SG 中,门诊 SG 占 31.0%(5227 例),住院 SG 占总数的 69%,报告了 11628 例。在 OPUDF 中报告的患者,平均住院时间(LOS)为 2.1 天(标准差 3.2),中位数为 1.0 天(四分位间距 = 1,2);在 IPUDF 中,平均 LOS 为 1.6 天,中位数为 1.0 天(四分位间距 = 1,1)。

结论

德克萨斯州的 SG 中有三分之一是在门诊状态下进行的。需要进一步研究以确定这种做法的安全性。

相似文献

1
Where are sleeves performed? An analysis of inpatient versus outpatient databases in a large state.在哪里进行袖状胃切除术?对大型州内住院患者和门诊患者数据库的分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Jul;15(7):1066-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
2
Trends in bariatric surgery in Texas: an analysis of a statewide administrative database 2013-2017.德克萨斯州减重手术趋势:2013-2017 年全州行政数据库分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Apr;35(4):1566-1571. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07533-4. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
3
How many sleeve gastrectomies are done at nonaccredited centers in Texas?德克萨斯州非认证中心进行了多少例袖状胃切除术?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 May;16(5):658-662. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
4
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a viable option for an ambulatory surgical procedure: our 52-month experience.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术作为一种可行的日间手术选择:我们的 52 个月经验。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Jun;14(6):748-750. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
5
Comparison of perioperative bariatric complications using 2 large databases: does the data add up?使用 2 个大型数据库比较围手术期减重手术并发症:数据是否一致?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Jul;15(7):1122-1131. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.041. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
6
Endoscopy Used as Provocative Testing in Bariatric Surgery: An Analysis of the Texas Public Use Data File.内镜检查在减重手术中的激发试验应用:德克萨斯州公共使用数据库分析。
JSLS. 2020 Jul-Sep;24(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00048.
7
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as day-case surgery: a case-matched study.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术日间手术:病例匹配研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Apr;15(4):534-545. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
8
Concomitant Hiatal Hernia Repair with Sleeve Gastrectomy: A 5-Year Analysis.胃袖状切除术联合食管裂孔疝修补术:5 年分析。
JSLS. 2020 Oct-Dec;24(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00066.
9
Disparities in Access to Bariatric Surgery in Texas 2013-2017.2013 - 2017年德克萨斯州减肥手术可及性的差异
JSLS. 2020 Apr-Jun;24(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00016.
10
Trends in bariatric surgery from 2008 to 2012.2008年至2012年减重手术的趋势。
Am J Surg. 2016 Jun;211(6):1041-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Concomitant Hiatal Hernia Repair with Sleeve Gastrectomy: A 5-Year Analysis.胃袖状切除术联合食管裂孔疝修补术:5 年分析。
JSLS. 2020 Oct-Dec;24(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00066.