• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经联邦批准后经口机器人手术中的阳性切缘率和预测因子:一项全国质量研究。

Positive margin rates and predictors in transoral robotic surgery after federal approval: A national quality study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Yale-New Haven Hospital, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2019 Sep;41(9):3064-3072. doi: 10.1002/hed.25792. Epub 2019 May 6.

DOI:10.1002/hed.25792
PMID:31058417
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Purpose of the study is to assess nationwide margin performance in oropharynx transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

METHODS

Retrospective review of the National Cancer Database.

RESULTS

Two thousand six hundred sixty-one patients were included. The national positive margin rate (PMR) was 16.9%. High-volume facilities had a lower PMR than low-volume facilities (12.7% vs 21.9%; P < .001). Patients with disease of the tonsil had a lower PMR (15.7%) than base-of-the-tongue (18.2%; P = .14). PMR increased with T classification (T1 = 13.0%, T2 = 17.1%, T3 = 28.2%, T4a = 45.9%, T4b = 58.3%; P < .001). On multivariable regression, factors associated with margin status included only lymph-vascular invasion (1.63[1.13-2.36]; P = .01), high volume (0.57[0.36-0.92]; P = .005), and T classification (as compared to T1, T2: 1.50[1.03-2.18], T3: 3.11[1.77-5.46], T4a: 7.03[2.95-16.75], T4b: 6.72[1.26-35.93]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

National PMR is 16.9%, substantially higher than reported in high-volume TORS centers. There is a linear association between positive margins and T classification, with T3 and T4 PMRs exceeding 28%. High-volume facilities are half as likely to yield positive margins compared to low-volume facilities. There was no association between human papilloma virus status, tumor subsite, or academic facility status and positive margins.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估口咽经口机器人手术(TORS)的全国切缘表现。

方法

回顾性分析国家癌症数据库。

结果

共纳入 2661 例患者。全国切缘阳性率(PMR)为 16.9%。高容量设施的 PMR 低于低容量设施(12.7%比 21.9%;P<.001)。扁桃体病变患者的 PMR(15.7%)低于舌根病变(18.2%;P=0.14)。PMR 随 T 分类增加而升高(T1 为 13.0%,T2 为 17.1%,T3 为 28.2%,T4a 为 45.9%,T4b 为 58.3%;P<.001)。多变量回归分析显示,与切缘状态相关的因素仅包括淋巴血管侵犯(1.63[1.13-2.36];P=0.01)、高容量(0.57[0.36-0.92];P=0.005)和 T 分类(与 T1 相比,T2:1.50[1.03-2.18],T3:3.11[1.77-5.46],T4a:7.03[2.95-16.75],T4b:6.72[1.26-35.93];P<.001)。

结论

全国 PMR 为 16.9%,明显高于高容量 TORS 中心报告的 PMR。切缘阳性与 T 分类呈线性关系,T3 和 T4 的切缘阳性率超过 28%。与低容量设施相比,高容量设施产生阳性切缘的可能性减半。人乳头瘤病毒状态、肿瘤部位和学术机构地位与阳性切缘之间没有关联。

相似文献

1
Positive margin rates and predictors in transoral robotic surgery after federal approval: A national quality study.经联邦批准后经口机器人手术中的阳性切缘率和预测因子:一项全国质量研究。
Head Neck. 2019 Sep;41(9):3064-3072. doi: 10.1002/hed.25792. Epub 2019 May 6.
2
Transoral Robotic Surgery: A Population-Level Analysis.经口机器人手术:一项基于人群水平的分析。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Jun;150(6):968-75. doi: 10.1177/0194599814525747. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
3
Positive Margins by Oropharyngeal Subsite in Transoral Robotic Surgery for T1/T2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma.口咽亚部位经口机器人手术治疗 T1/T2 期鳞状细胞癌的切缘阳性率。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Apr;158(4):660-666. doi: 10.1177/0194599817742852. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
4
Clinical value of transoral robotic surgery: Nationwide results from the first 5 years of adoption.经口机器人手术的临床价值:全国采用头5年的结果
Laryngoscope. 2019 Aug;129(8):1844-1855. doi: 10.1002/lary.27740. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
5
Comparison of Survival After Transoral Robotic Surgery vs Nonrobotic Surgery in Patients With Early-Stage Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.经口机器人手术与非机器人手术治疗早期口咽鳞状细胞癌患者的生存比较。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Oct 1;6(10):1555-1562. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3172.
6
Margins in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Transoral Laser Microsurgery: A National Database Study.经口激光微创手术治疗喉鳞状细胞癌的边缘:国家数据库研究。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Dec;161(6):986-992. doi: 10.1177/0194599819874315. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
7
Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma: Surgical margins and oncologic outcomes.口咽癌的经口机器人手术:手术切缘与肿瘤学结局。
Head Neck. 2018 Apr;40(4):747-755. doi: 10.1002/hed.25055. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis of margins in transoral surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma.经口手术治疗口咽癌的切缘分析:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Oral Oncol. 2019 Nov;98:69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.09.017. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
9
Adoption of transoral robotic surgery compared with other surgical modalities for treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.与其他手术方式相比,经口机器人手术在治疗口咽鳞状细胞癌中的应用。
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;114(4):405-11. doi: 10.1002/jso.24353. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
10
The impact of socioeconomic and geographic factors on access to transoral robotic/endoscopic surgery for early stage oropharyngeal malignancy.社会经济和地理因素对早期口咽恶性肿瘤经口机器人/内镜手术可及性的影响。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2022 Jan-Feb;43(1):103243. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103243. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-4 N0M0 Head and Neck Spindle Cell Carcinoma.cT1-4 N0M0头颈部梭形细胞癌的选择性颈清扫术
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Aug;173(2):433-446. doi: 10.1002/ohn.1265. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
2
Preoperative Clinical and Tumor Factors Associated With Adjuvant Therapy for Oral Cavity Cancer.口腔癌辅助治疗相关的术前临床和肿瘤因素
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 May 1;151(5):466-475. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.5250.
3
Volume Outcome Relationships of Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Undergoing Transoral Robotic Surgery.
接受经口机器人手术的口咽癌患者的容积-结局关系
Laryngoscope. 2025 Aug;135(8):2810-2818. doi: 10.1002/lary.32098. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
4
Use of Intraoperative Frozen Section to Assess Surgical Margins in HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Carcinoma.术中冰冻切片在人乳头瘤病毒相关口咽癌手术切缘评估中的应用
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Mar 1;151(3):253-262. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4869.
5
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jan-Feb;91(1):101515. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101515. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
6
Choice of Adjuvant Radiotherapy Facility in Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.鼻腔鼻窦鳞状细胞癌辅助放疗设备的选择
Laryngoscope. 2025 Feb;135(2):705-715. doi: 10.1002/lary.31794. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
7
Transoral Surgery in HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: Oncologic Outcomes in the Veterans Affairs System.经口手术治疗 HPV 阳性口咽癌:退伍军人事务系统的肿瘤学结局。
Laryngoscope. 2024 Jan;134(1):207-214. doi: 10.1002/lary.30784. Epub 2023 May 31.
8
Transoral Robotic Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer: Advances and Residual Knowledge Gaps.头颈部癌的经口机器人手术:进展与尚存的知识差距
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 16;12(6):2303. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062303.
9
Analysis of Outcomes following TORS in a Mixed Cohort of Recurrent and New T1-T2 Oropharyngeal Cancer- A Single Institution Study.复发性和新发T1-T2口咽癌混合队列中行经口机器人手术(TORS)后的结果分析——一项单机构研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(4):555-563. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03139-5. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
10
Feasibility and safety of the da Vinci Xi surgical robot for transoral robotic surgery.达芬奇Xi手术机器人用于经口机器人手术的可行性与安全性。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):571-576. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01449-y. Epub 2022 Aug 16.