Chandrahari Namratha, Kumar C Ravi, R Salgar Abdul, N Prathibha, Singh Monika, Singh Shikha
Department of Prosthodontics Crown and Bridge, Government Dental College and Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, e-mail:
Department of Prosthodontics Crown and Bridge, Mamata Dental College and Hospital, Khammam, Telangana, India.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Jan 1;20(1):71-77.
To assess and compare the impact and flexural strength of heat cure acrylic resin polymerized by microwave and conventional methods after immersion in artificial saliva for 2 days, 60 days, 90 days and 120 days.
The present study was carried out on 160 specimens. They were categorized into two groups. Each group consisted of 80 specimens, polymerized either by conventional or microwave methods. All the specimens were immersed in artificial saliva, for varying periods of 2 days, 60 days, 90 days and 120 days. Flexural strength was measured by a universal testing machine and impact strength by Izod impact test. Analysis of the results was done by Statistical Package for the Social Services version 20 (IBM Corp. Released 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, SPSS version 20.0. Armonk, NY: USA, IBM Corp) for Windows software.
Conventionally cured resin had the highest flexural and impact strength values after 2 days of immersion in artificial saliva. There was a significant decrease in strength as the number of days of immersion increased (p < 0.001).
Conventional acrylic resin polymerized in a water bath exhibited better flexural, and impact strength values than microwave cured the resin. All the samples cured by both methods showed a significant reduction in strength when immersed for a period of 60-90 days and thereafter became static over 120 days.
As dentures are exposed to moist environment constantly and with time, their strength gets reduced. Prosthodontists should have adequate knowledge regarding the physical properties of materials used for denture preparation and also the pros and cons of different polymerization methods. In our study, conventional acrylic resin polymerized in a micro-wave method exhibited lesser strength values, but they were clinically acceptable; so, this method can be used for curing dentures.
评估并比较经微波聚合和传统方法聚合的热固化丙烯酸树脂在人工唾液中浸泡2天、60天、90天和120天后的冲击强度和弯曲强度。
本研究使用了160个样本。它们被分为两组。每组由80个样本组成,分别通过传统方法或微波方法聚合。所有样本在人工唾液中浸泡不同时间,分别为2天、60天、90天和120天。弯曲强度通过万能试验机测量,冲击强度通过悬臂梁冲击试验测量。结果分析使用社会科学统计软件包第20版(IBM公司。2011年发布。适用于Windows的IBM SPSS Statistics,SPSS版本20.0。美国纽约州阿蒙克:IBM公司)软件。
在人工唾液中浸泡2天后,传统固化树脂的弯曲强度和冲击强度值最高。随着浸泡天数增加,强度显著下降(p < 0.001)。
在水浴中聚合的传统丙烯酸树脂比微波固化树脂表现出更好的弯曲强度和冲击强度值。两种方法固化的所有样本在浸泡60 - 90天后强度均显著降低,此后在120天内保持稳定。
由于假牙持续暴露于潮湿环境且随着时间推移,其强度会降低。口腔修复医生应充分了解用于假牙制备材料的物理性能以及不同聚合方法的优缺点。在我们的研究中,通过微波方法聚合的传统丙烯酸树脂强度值较低,但在临床上是可接受的;因此,这种方法可用于假牙固化。