Suppr超能文献

与传统治疗相比,尿路感染单剂量疗法的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of single-dose therapy of urinary tract infection compared to conventional treatment.

作者信息

Carlson K J

出版信息

Eur Urol. 1987;13 Suppl 1:45-7. doi: 10.1159/000472859.

Abstract

A cost effectiveness analysis comparing single-dose with conventional antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated urinary tract infection is described. The analysis is based on aggregated effectiveness and side effect rates reported in the medical literature. A comparison of single-dose and conventional regimens of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and amoxicillin indicates that single-dose regimens are preferable to conventional regimens of either drug, and that trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is preferable to amoxicillin, on the grounds both of days of morbidity averted and of medical care costs. Thus single-dose therapy is cost-effective compared to conventional treatment.

摘要

本文描述了一项针对单纯性尿路感染,比较单剂量抗生素治疗与传统抗生素治疗的成本效益分析。该分析基于医学文献中报道的综合有效性和副作用发生率。对甲氧苄啶 - 磺胺甲恶唑和阿莫西林的单剂量与传统治疗方案的比较表明,基于避免发病天数和医疗费用两方面的原因,单剂量方案比这两种药物的传统方案更可取,且甲氧苄啶 - 磺胺甲恶唑比阿莫西林更可取。因此,与传统治疗相比,单剂量治疗具有成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验