Suppr超能文献

初次前交叉韧带重建术后,Hop 测试与关键结局变量的关联缺乏强相关性:一项系统评价。

Hop Testing Lacks Strong Association With Key Outcome Variables After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):511-522. doi: 10.1177/0363546519838794. Epub 2019 May 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-legged hop tests are commonly used assessments in return to sport (RTS) testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Although these tests are commonly used, their predictive validity has not yet been established.

PURPOSE

To determine the strength of association between hop testing and RTS, knee reinjury, subjective report of knee function, and posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis (PTOA) after primary ACLR. Secondarily, to determine whether hop testing is able to predict a favorable result on the same outcome variables.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic, computer-assisted literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed when conducting and reporting this review. Primary outcome variables for this review were self-report of knee function, return to preinjury level of activity, presence of reinjury, and presence of PTOA. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence tool was used to assess the level of evidence for each included study. Quality assessment of each included study was performed through use of a modified Downs and Black scale. Available metrics were tabulated based on outcome variables.

RESULTS

Overall, 21 studies (4476 patients) met inclusion for this review. The majority of evidence (95.2%) was of moderate to high methodologic quality. The most commonly associated outcome measure was the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.20 to 0.60. The strength of association between the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and hop testing ranged from -0.10 to 0.62 in 4 studies. In all, 10 studies examined the relationship between hop testing and RTS, with variable association statistics reported. No meaningful association was found between hop testing and knee reinjury in 2 studies. Worse preoperative hop testing was associated with PTOA in 1 study.

CONCLUSION

Hop testing appears to possess fair association to subjective report of knee function measured by the KOOS and IKDC and a patient's ability to RTS after ACLR. Insufficient evidence is available to determine the relationship between hop testing and PTOA and knee reinjury. Predictive validity cannot be established based on available literature.

摘要

背景

单腿跳跃测试常用于前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后重返运动(RTS)测试。尽管这些测试被广泛使用,但它们的预测效度尚未确定。

目的

确定单腿跳跃测试与 ACLR 后 RTS、膝关节再损伤、膝关节功能主观报告和创伤后膝关节骨关节炎(PTOA)之间的关联强度。其次,确定单腿跳跃测试是否能够预测同一结果变量的有利结果。

研究设计

系统回顾。

方法

在 PubMed/MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、SPORTDiscus、Cochrane 图书馆和 ClinicalTrials.gov 中进行了系统的、计算机辅助的文献检索。在进行和报告本综述时遵循了 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南。本综述的主要结局变量是膝关节功能的自我报告、恢复到受伤前的活动水平、再损伤的存在和 PTOA 的存在。使用牛津循证医学中心证据水平工具评估每个纳入研究的证据水平。通过使用改良的 Downs 和 Black 量表对每个纳入研究进行质量评估。根据结局变量列出了可用的指标。

结果

总体而言,有 21 项研究(4476 名患者)符合本综述的纳入标准。大多数证据(95.2%)为中到高度的方法学质量。最常相关的结局测量指标是国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分,其 Pearson 相关系数范围为 0.20 至 0.60。在 4 项研究中,膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)和单腿跳跃测试之间的关联强度范围为-0.10 至 0.62。总共 10 项研究检查了单腿跳跃测试与 RTS 之间的关系,报告了不同的关联统计数据。在 2 项研究中,没有发现单腿跳跃测试与膝关节再损伤之间存在有意义的关联。1 项研究表明,术前单腿跳跃测试较差与 PTOA 相关。

结论

单腿跳跃测试似乎与 KOOS 和 IKDC 测量的膝关节功能的主观报告以及 ACLR 后患者的 RTS 能力具有较好的相关性。目前尚无足够的证据确定单腿跳跃测试与 PTOA 和膝关节再损伤之间的关系。根据现有文献,无法确定预测效度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验