Department of Psychology,Austin Peay Building,University of Tennessee,Knoxville,TN
School of Human Evolution and Social Change,Arizona State University,Tempe, AZ
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e124. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18000596.
The debate about whether replication studies should become mainstream is essentially driven by disagreements about their costs and benefits and the best ways to allocate limited resources. Determining when replications are worthwhile requires quantifying their expected utility. We argue that a formalized framework for such evaluations can be useful for both individual decision-making and collective discussions about replication.
关于复制研究是否应该成为主流的争论,本质上是由对其成本和效益以及分配有限资源的最佳方式的分歧所驱动的。确定何时进行复制研究是值得的,需要量化其预期效用。我们认为,对于这种评估的形式化框架,对于个体决策和关于复制的集体讨论都是有用的。