Department of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Jihlavska 20, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic.
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ann Hematol. 2019 Aug;98(8):1961-1972. doi: 10.1007/s00277-019-03694-y. Epub 2019 May 8.
Peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTLs) have a globally poor prognosis. The CHOP regimen shows insufficient efficacy; first-line consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) is a promising strategy but has never been confirmed by randomized data. We analyzed retrospectively 906 patients diagnosed with PTL between 1999 and 2015. Chemotherapy was given to 862 patients, and 412 of them were < 60 years. In this subset, we compared induction with CHOP (n = 113) vs. CHOEP (n = 68) and tested auto-SCT (n = 79) vs. no SCT (n = 73) in the intent-to-treat analysis. The median age of the whole cohort at diagnosis was 60 years (range; 18-91); the median follow-up was 4.3 years (range; 0.1-17.8). A shorter overall survival (OS) was associated with the male gender, age ≥ 60 years, stage III/IV, performance status ≥ 2, bulky tumor ≥ 10 cm, and elevated LDH. CHOEP induction showed a better 5-year PFS (25.0% vs. 32.9%; p.001), and 5-year OS (65.6% vs. 47.6%; p.008) than CHOP. Auto-SCT compared to no SCT brought a 5-year OS of 49.2% vs. 59.5% (p.187). Auto-SCT did not influence the OS in low-risk or low-intermediate risk PTLs. The high-intermediate and high-risk IPIs displayed a worse 5-year OS in auto-SCT arm (17.7% vs.46.2%; p.049); however, 73.9% of the patients never received planned auto-SCT. Our population-based analysis showed the superiority of CHOEP over CHOP in first-line treatment. We confirm the 5-year OS of around 50% in PTLs undergoing auto-SCT. However, the intended auto-SCT could not be given in 73.9% of the high-risk PTLs.
外周 T 细胞淋巴瘤 (PTL) 的全球预后较差。CHOP 方案显示疗效不足;一线巩固自体造血干细胞移植(auto-SCT)是一种有前途的策略,但从未得到随机数据的证实。我们回顾性分析了 1999 年至 2015 年间诊断为 PTL 的 906 例患者。862 例患者接受了化疗,其中 412 例年龄<60 岁。在这个亚组中,我们比较了诱导治疗使用 CHOP(n=113)与 CHOEP(n=68),并在意向治疗分析中比较了接受 auto-SCT(n=79)与未接受 SCT(n=73)的疗效。整个队列的中位诊断年龄为 60 岁(范围 18-91 岁);中位随访时间为 4.3 年(范围 0.1-17.8 年)。总生存(OS)较短与男性、年龄≥60 岁、III/IV 期、体能状态≥2、肿块≥10cm 和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)升高有关。CHOEP 诱导治疗的 5 年无进展生存(PFS)(25.0%比 32.9%;p.001)和 5 年 OS(65.6%比 47.6%;p.008)均优于 CHOP。与不进行 SCT 相比,auto-SCT 可带来 5 年 OS 为 49.2%比 59.5%(p.187)。在低危或低中危 PTL 中,auto-SCT 并不影响 OS。高危、高中危 IPIs 的患者在 auto-SCT 组中 5 年 OS 更差(17.7%比 46.2%;p.049);然而,73.9%的患者从未接受过计划的 auto-SCT。我们的基于人群的分析显示,CHOEP 在一线治疗中优于 CHOP。我们确认了接受 auto-SCT 的 PTL 5 年 OS 约为 50%。然而,73.9%的高危 PTL 患者无法进行计划的 auto-SCT。