• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

排班模式与初级卫生保健质量:一项多层次横断面研究。

Scheduling models and primary health care quality: a multilevel and cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Vidal Tiago Barra, Rocha Suelen Alves, Harzheim Erno, Hauser Lisiane, Tesser Charles Dalcanale

机构信息

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.

Universidade Estadual Paulista. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Saude Publica. 2019;53:38. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2019053000940. Epub 2019 May 6.

DOI:10.11606/S1518-8787.2019053000940
PMID:31066816
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6536099/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the scheduling model influences the perception of the user about the quality of primary health care centers.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional and population-based study that measured the quality of centers by the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool-Brazil), applied to adult users (n = 409) from 11 health centers in Florianópolis, state of Santa Catarina. Multilevel analysis was used to verify the relationship between the score of general quality of the primary health care and the scheduling model. The independent variables (age, skin color, scheduling model, panel size by primary health team, poverty ratio as income proxy, number of health teams, presence of economically interest areas, number of medical appointments in one year per primary health team, number of people treated in one year per health team), with p < 0.20 were selected for the multilevel model, which was adjusted with aggregates of information from users and health centers.

RESULTS

The health center that used advanced access had a general score of 7.04, while those using a weekly carve-out had a score of 6.26; the carve-out every 15 days, score of 5.87; and the traditional carve-out, score of 6.29.

CONCLUSIONS

The scheduling model of advanced access had a positive effect on the quality of primary health care, in the perception of users.

摘要

目的

评估排班模式是否会影响用户对初级卫生保健中心质量的认知。

方法

这是一项基于人群的横断面研究,通过应用于圣卡塔琳娜州弗洛里亚诺波利斯11个卫生中心的成年用户(n = 409)的初级保健评估工具(巴西版PCATool)来衡量中心的质量。采用多水平分析来验证初级卫生保健总体质量得分与排班模式之间的关系。将p < 0.20的自变量(年龄、肤色、排班模式、初级卫生团队的小组规模、作为收入替代指标的贫困率、卫生团队数量、经济利益区域的存在情况、每个初级卫生团队每年的医疗预约数量、每个卫生团队每年治疗的人数)纳入多水平模型,并根据用户和卫生中心的信息汇总进行调整。

结果

采用先进预约制的卫生中心总体得分为7.04,而采用每周预留制的得分为6.26;每15天预留制的得分为5.87;传统预留制的得分为6.29。

结论

在用户认知中,先进预约制的排班模式对初级卫生保健质量有积极影响。

相似文献

1
Scheduling models and primary health care quality: a multilevel and cross-sectional study.排班模式与初级卫生保健质量:一项多层次横断面研究。
Rev Saude Publica. 2019;53:38. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2019053000940. Epub 2019 May 6.
2
Evaluation of Primary Health Care performance in Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil, 2012: a cross-sectional population-based study.2012年巴西圣卡塔琳娜州弗洛里亚诺波利斯初级卫生保健绩效评估:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2018 Nov 8;27(4):e2017504. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742018000400006.
3
The patient satisfaction questionnaire of EUprimecare project: measurement properties.欧盟优质护理项目的患者满意度调查问卷:测量属性
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Jun;28(3):275-80. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw024. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
4
Indicators for dental appointment scheduling in primary health care: a national cross-sectional study.初级卫生保健中牙科预约安排的指标:一项全国性横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 8;21(1):2234. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12319-x.
5
Primary care assessment from a male population perspective.从男性群体视角进行的初级保健评估。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018 Mar-Apr;71(2):236-243. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0651.
6
Patient and Visit Characteristics Associated With Use of Direct Scheduling in Primary Care Practices.患者和就诊特征与初级保健实践中直接预约的使用相关。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e209637. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9637.
7
Baseline measures of primary health care team functioning and overall primary health care performance at Du Noon Community Health Centre.杜农社区健康中心初级卫生保健团队运作及总体初级卫生保健绩效的基线测量。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018 Sep 5;10(1):e1-e11. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1458.
8
Factors associated with the performance of primary dental health care in Brazil: A multilevel approach.巴西初级口腔卫生保健服务绩效的相关因素:一种多层次方法
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(17):e19872. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019872.
9
[Evaluation of the quality of primary health care from the perspective of the elderly].[从老年人视角评估初级卫生保健质量]
Cien Saude Colet. 2014 Aug;19(8):3521-32. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232014198.21862013.
10
Academic family health teams: Part 2: patient perceptions of access.学术性家庭健康团队:第2部分:患者对就医便利性的看法。
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Jan;62(1):e31-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Advanced Access in Primary Healthcare and Its Effects on Emergency Department Utilization: A Rapid Review.初级医疗保健中的高级访问及其对急诊科利用的影响:快速综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 15;13(12):1430. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121430.
2
Supporting a rapid primary care response to emergent communicable disease threats with PACK (Practical Approach to Care Kit) in Florianópolis, Brazil.在巴西弗洛里亚诺波利斯,使用实用护理工具包(PACK)为突发传染病威胁提供快速初级保健应对支持。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Oct 28;9(Suppl 3):e013815. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013815.
3
Successes, weaknesses, and recommendations to strengthen primary health care: a scoping review.加强初级卫生保健的成功经验、薄弱环节及建议:一项范围综述
Arch Public Health. 2023 Jun 2;81(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01116-0.
4
Absenteeism in child health services: a systematic review.儿童保健服务中的缺勤现象:系统评价。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2023 May 29;76Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e20210805. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0805. eCollection 2023.
5
Progress and challenges in potential access to oral health primary care services in Brazil: A population-based panel study with latent transition analysis.巴西获取口腔基本医疗保健服务的进展与挑战:基于人口的潜类别转移分析面板研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 16;16(3):e0247101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247101. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The Waiting Game - Why Providers May Fail to Reduce Wait Times.等待游戏——为何医疗服务提供者可能无法缩短等待时间。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 15;376(24):2309-2311. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1704478.
2
Performance of primary health care according to PCATool instrument: a systematic review.根据PCATool工具评估初级卫生保健的绩效:一项系统综述
Cien Saude Colet. 2017 Jun;22(6):1881-1893. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232017226.14282016.
3
Interventions to reduce wait times for primary care appointments: a systematic review.减少初级保健预约等待时间的干预措施:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 20;17(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2219-y.
4
Factors associated with user satisfaction regarding treatment offered in Brazilian primary health care.与巴西初级卫生保健所提供治疗的用户满意度相关的因素。
Cad Saude Publica. 2017 Mar 30;33(2):e00184715. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00184715.
5
The use of the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT): an integrative review and proposed update.初级保健评估工具(PCAT)的应用:一项综合综述及更新建议
Cien Saude Colet. 2017 Mar;22(3):855-865. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232017223.03312016.
6
Implementation of an Advanced Access Scheduling System in Primary Healthcare: One Clinic's Experience.初级医疗保健中先进预约调度系统的实施:一家诊所的经验。
Healthc Q. 2015;18(1):60-4. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2015.24241.
7
Challenge of same-day access in primary care.基层医疗中当日就诊的挑战。
Can Fam Physician. 2015 May;61(5):399-400, 407-9.
8
Only one third of family physicians can estimate their patient panel size.只有三分之一的家庭医生能够估算出他们负责的患者数量。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Mar-Apr;28(2):173-4. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.02.140276.
9
Income inequality and health: a causal review.收入不平等与健康:因果关系述评。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;128:316-26. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.031. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
10
How many patients should a family physician have? Factors to consider in answering a deceptively simple question.一名家庭医生应该拥有多少患者?回答一个看似简单的问题时需要考虑的因素。
Healthc Policy. 2012 May;7(4):26-34.