Suppr超能文献

初级医疗保健中的高级访问及其对急诊科利用的影响:快速综述。

Advanced Access in Primary Healthcare and Its Effects on Emergency Department Utilization: A Rapid Review.

作者信息

Tannure Rafael, Sarkis Salma, Peres Amanda, Lapa Juliana de Souza, Rodrigues Lígia Villela, Landim Italo, Gomes Ciro Martins, Poças Katia Crestine, Peixoto Henry Maia, Batista Sandro Rogério Rodrigues, Deusdará Rodolfo

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University Center of Brasília, Brasília 70790-075, Brazil.

Secretaria de Estado de Saúde do Distrito Federal, Brasília 70719-040, Brazil.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 15;13(12):1430. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121430.

Abstract

The advanced access (AA) scheduling model in primary healthcare (PHC) may reduce unnecessary visits to the emergency department (ED). However, evidence of this effect remains uncertain and limited. To evaluate whether the adoption of AA models in PHC may reduce ED visits, when compared to the traditional model. A rapid review of the literature according to the World Health Organization's guidelines was performed, using two databases (PubMed and Lilacs) with articles from 1980 to 2023. A total of 1286 articles were found according to our search. Of them, 1245 were excluded based on their titles, most of them due to not evaluating advanced accesses as an intervention. Of the remaining 41 articles, many did not evaluate ED visits as an outcome, nor did they have the criteria of inclusion. Eight articles evaluated ED visits as an outcome and had inclusion criteria. Five articles were included and three found an association between the adoption of advanced access in PHC and a reduction in ED visits. This review shows that the adoption of AA in PHC may reduce ED visits. However, it is essential to carry out new studies to understand the relationship between the adoption of AA in PHC and its outcomes in universal healthcare systems.

摘要

初级医疗保健(PHC)中的高级访问(AA)调度模型可能会减少对急诊科(ED)的不必要就诊。然而,这种效果的证据仍然不确定且有限。为了评估与传统模型相比,在初级医疗保健中采用AA模型是否可以减少急诊就诊。根据世界卫生组织的指南,使用两个数据库(PubMed和Lilacs)对1980年至2023年的文章进行了快速文献综述。根据我们的搜索,共找到1286篇文章。其中,1245篇因标题原因被排除,大多数是因为没有将高级访问作为一种干预措施进行评估。在其余41篇文章中,许多没有将急诊就诊作为结果进行评估,也没有纳入标准。八篇文章将急诊就诊作为结果进行了评估并有纳入标准。纳入了五篇文章,其中三篇发现初级医疗保健中采用高级访问与急诊就诊减少之间存在关联。这篇综述表明,在初级医疗保健中采用AA可能会减少急诊就诊。然而,开展新的研究以了解初级医疗保健中采用AA与其在全民医疗保健系统中的结果之间的关系至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e4a/12192848/5e60b9a9821b/healthcare-13-01430-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验