• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高血压患者登记研究中脉压/每搏输出量指数升高的预后影响:坎帕尼亚健康网络研究

Prognostic impact of increased pulse pressure/stroke index in a registry of hypertensive patients: the Campania Salute Network.

作者信息

Mancusi Costantino, Losi Maria Angela, Izzo Raffaele, Gerdts Eva, Canciello Grazia, Arnone Maria Immacolata, Trimarco Bruno, de Simone Giovanni, De Luca Nicola

机构信息

a Hypertension Research Center, Federico II University , Naples , Italy.

b Department of Advanced biomedical Science , Federico II University Hospital , Naples , Italy.

出版信息

Blood Press. 2019 Aug;28(4):268-275. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2019.1612705. Epub 2019 May 9.

DOI:10.1080/08037051.2019.1612705
PMID:31068016
Abstract

Increased arterial stiffness is associated with advanced arteriosclerosis, abnormal left ventricular (LV) geometry and function. Whether increased arterial stiffness is associated with incident cardiovascular (CV) event (MACE), independent of other markers of target organ damage needs to be clarified. We selected hypertensive participants of the Campania Salute Network free of prevalent CV disease, with available echocardiogram and carotid ultrasound, ejection fraction ≥50%, and ≤ stage III Chronic Kidney Disease ( = 6907). Median follow-up was 63 months. End-point was incident MACE (fatal and non-fatal stroke and myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death, carotid stenting and heart failure requiring hospitalization). Arterial stiffness was assessed from ratio of brachial pulse pressure/stroke index (i.e. normalized for body height in meter to 2.04 power) (PP/SVi). High PP/SVi ( = 980) was defined as >95th sex-specific percentile of the normal distribution from a reference normal population (>2.63/>2.82 mmHg/ml in men and women, respectively). Patients with high PP/SVi were more likely to be women, older, diabetic, with higher systolic blood pressure (BP) and heart rate, more LV concentric geometry, left atrial dilatation and more carotid plaque (all  < .01). At given increase in SVi, patients with high PP/SVi exhibited two-fold increase in PP compared to normal PP/SVi. In Cox regression, patients with high PP/SVi had 63% increased hazard of MACE [95% CI (1.02-2.59)  = .04], independently of significant effect of older age, male sex, carotid plaque and less frequent anti-RAS therapy. In treated hypertensive patients, high PP/SVi predicted increased rate of MACE, independent of common confounders.

摘要

动脉僵硬度增加与晚期动脉硬化、左心室(LV)几何形状和功能异常有关。动脉僵硬度增加是否与心血管(CV)事件(主要不良心血管事件)相关,独立于其他靶器官损害标志物,这一点尚需明确。我们从坎帕尼亚健康网络中选取了无CV疾病史的高血压参与者,这些参与者有可用的超声心动图和颈动脉超声检查结果,射血分数≥50%,且慢性肾脏病≤III期(n = 6907)。中位随访时间为63个月。终点是发生主要不良心血管事件(致命和非致命性中风、心肌梗死、心源性猝死、颈动脉支架置入术以及需要住院治疗的心力衰竭)。通过肱动脉脉压/每搏量指数(即根据身高米数归一化至2.04次方)(PP/SVi)比值评估动脉僵硬度。高PP/SVi(n = 980)定义为高于参考正常人群正常分布的第95性别特异性百分位数(男性和女性分别>2.63/>2.82 mmHg/ml)。高PP/SVi患者更可能为女性、年龄较大、患有糖尿病、收缩压(BP)和心率较高、左心室更呈向心性几何形状、左心房扩张且颈动脉斑块更多(均P < 0.01)。在每搏量指数给定增加的情况下,高PP/SVi患者的脉压相比正常PP/SVi患者增加了两倍。在Cox回归分析中,高PP/SVi患者发生主要不良心血管事件的风险增加63% [95%置信区间(1.02 - 2.59),P = 0.04],独立于年龄较大、男性、颈动脉斑块以及抗肾素 - 血管紧张素系统(RAS)治疗频率较低的显著影响。在接受治疗的高血压患者中,高PP/SVi可预测主要不良心血管事件发生率增加,独立于常见混杂因素。

相似文献

1
Prognostic impact of increased pulse pressure/stroke index in a registry of hypertensive patients: the Campania Salute Network.高血压患者登记研究中脉压/每搏输出量指数升高的预后影响:坎帕尼亚健康网络研究
Blood Press. 2019 Aug;28(4):268-275. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2019.1612705. Epub 2019 May 9.
2
Higher pulse pressure and risk for cardiovascular events in patients with essential hypertension: The Campania Salute Network.原发性高血压患者脉压升高与心血管事件风险:坎帕尼亚健康网络研究。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Feb;25(3):235-243. doi: 10.1177/2047487317747498. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
3
Arterial stiffness is associated with carotid atherosclerosis in hypertensive patients (the Campania Salute Network).动脉僵硬度与高血压患者的颈动脉粥样硬化有关(坎帕尼亚健康网络)。
Am J Hypertens. 2012 Jul;25(7):739-45. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2012.38. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
4
Higher pulse pressure/stroke volume index is associated with impaired outcome in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy the LIFE study.在高血压左心室肥厚患者中,较高的脉压/每搏量指数与不良预后相关(LIFE研究)。
Blood Press. 2017 Jun;26(3):150-155. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2016.1243009. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
5
Left atrial dilatation: A target organ damage in young to middle-age hypertensive patients. The Campania Salute Network.左心房扩张:年轻至中年高血压患者的靶器官损害。坎帕尼亚健康网络。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 15;265:229-233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.120. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
6
Pulse pressure/stroke index and left ventricular geometry and function: the LIFE Study.脉压/每搏指数与左心室几何形态及功能:LIFE研究
J Hypertens. 2003 Apr;21(4):781-7. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200304000-00022.
7
Influence of Left Ventricular Stroke Volume on Incident Heart Failure in a Population With Preserved Ejection Fraction (from the Strong Heart Study).左心室每搏输出量对射血分数保留人群发生心力衰竭的影响(来自强心研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Apr 1;119(7):1047-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.12.011. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
8
Relation of flow-mediated dilation to global arterial load: impact of hypertension and additional cardiovascular risk factors.血流介导的扩张与总动脉负荷的关系:高血压和其他心血管危险因素的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2011 Oct 20;152(2):225-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.07.020. Epub 2010 Aug 1.
9
Stroke volume/pulse pressure ratio and cardiovascular risk in arterial hypertension.高血压患者的每搏输出量/脉压比值与心血管风险
Hypertension. 1999 Mar;33(3):800-5. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.33.3.800.
10
Change in pulse pressure/stroke index in response to sustained blood pressure reduction and its impact on left ventricular mass and geometry changes: the life study.持续性血压降低时脉压/每搏指数的变化及其对左心室质量和几何形态变化的影响: LIFE研究
Am J Hypertens. 2008 Jun;21(6):701-7. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2008.162. Epub 2008 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypertension in Women: Should There be a Sex-specific Threshold?女性高血压:是否应有性别特异性阈值?
Eur Cardiol. 2021 Oct 18;16:e38. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2021.17. eCollection 2021 Feb.