Suppr超能文献

磁共振成像能否区分经尿道膀胱内填充物、尿道憩室和尿道周围囊肿?

Can magnetic resonance imaging differentiate among transurethral bulking agent, urethral diverticulum, and periurethral cyst?

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, 1873 Rama 4 Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Aug;44(8):2852-2863. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02052-w.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate magnetic resonance imaging findings that differentiate among periurethral bulking agents (primarily collagen), urethral diverticulum, and periurethral cyst.

METHODS

We searched our radiologic database retrospectively from 2001 to 2017 for periurethral cystic lesions, identifying a total of 50 patients with 68 lesions. Final diagnoses in 68 lesions were bulking agents (27), urethral diverticula (29), and periurethral cysts (12). Two abdominal radiologists, blinded to clinical history, independently evaluated T1, T2, and post-contrast images. The readers assessed number, morphological features, location, connection to urethra and mass effect, signal intensity, and enhancement for each lesion. Fisher exact test and logistic regression analysis were performed for each univariate significant feature. The operative and pathologic reports were the reference standard.

RESULTS

Magnetic resonance imaging features found more often in bulking agents versus urethral diverticulum were multiple lesions (P = 0.011), upper or upper-mid-urethral location (P ≤ 0.0001), lack of internal fluid/fluid level (P = 0.002), no urethral connection (P = 0.005), T1 isointensity, and T2 mild hyperintensity compared to muscles but lower T2 signal than urine (P < 0.0001). Most cases of urethral diverticula and periurethral cysts were detected at mid- and lower urethra. Urethral diverticula were larger than bulking agents and periurethral cysts (P = 0.005 and P = 0.023) (mean diameter = 24, 16, 15 mm, respectively). Most bulking agents (93%) and urethral diverticula (90%) showed mass effect on urethra, while periurethral cysts (75%) did not (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Signal intensity and lesion characterization on magnetic resonance imaging can significantly differentiate bulking agent from urethral diverticulum and periurethral cyst. Radiologists should consider differential diagnosis of a bulking agent, especially when distinguishing characteristics described here are present to prevent incorrect diagnosis and ultimately unnecessary surgical intervention.

摘要

目的

评估磁共振成像(MRI)在鉴别尿道周围填充剂(主要为胶原蛋白)、尿道憩室和尿道周围囊肿中的作用。

方法

我们回顾性地检索了 2001 年至 2017 年的放射学数据库,以寻找尿道周围囊性病变,共确定了 50 例患者的 68 个病灶。在 68 个病灶中,最终诊断分别为填充剂(27 个)、尿道憩室(29 个)和尿道周围囊肿(12 个)。两名腹部放射科医生在不了解临床病史的情况下,分别对 T1、T2 和对比后图像进行评估。读者评估了每个病变的数量、形态特征、位置、与尿道的连接和对尿道的压迫、信号强度和增强情况。对每个单变量有显著意义的特征进行 Fisher 确切检验和逻辑回归分析。手术和病理报告为参考标准。

结果

与尿道憩室相比,MRI 发现填充剂更常见的特征包括:多个病变(P=0.011)、上或中上段尿道位置(P≤0.0001)、无内部液体/液平(P=0.002)、无尿道连接(P=0.005)、T1 等信号强度和 T2 轻度高信号强度,但与肌肉相比 T2 信号较低(P<0.0001)。大多数尿道憩室和尿道周围囊肿位于中下段尿道。尿道憩室比填充剂和尿道周围囊肿大(P=0.005 和 P=0.023)(平均直径分别为 24、16、15mm)。大多数填充剂(93%)和尿道憩室(90%)对尿道有压迫作用,而尿道周围囊肿(75%)没有(P<0.0001)。

结论

MRI 上的信号强度和病变特征可以显著区分填充剂与尿道憩室和尿道周围囊肿。放射科医生应考虑填充剂的鉴别诊断,特别是当存在本文所述的特征时,以避免错误诊断并最终避免不必要的手术干预。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验