University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Aug;34(8):1428-1435. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3726. Epub 2019 May 9.
FRAX was developed to predict 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture in the general population. Aromatase inhibitors (AI) used in breast cancer induce loss in bone mineral density (BMD) and are reported to increase fracture risk. AI exposure is not a direct input to FRAX but is captured under "secondary osteoporosis". To inform use of FRAX in women treated with AI, we used a population-based registry for the Province of Manitoba, Canada, to identify women aged ≥40 years initiating AI for breast cancer with at least 12 months' AI exposure (n = 1775), women with breast cancer not receiving AI (n = 1016), and women from the general population (n = 34,205). Among AI users, fracture probability estimated without BMD (AI use coded as secondary osteoporosis) significantly overestimated risk (10-year observed/predicted ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.68; 10-year hip fracture observed/predicted ratio 0.33, 95% CI 0.18-0.49). However, when BMD was included in the fracture probability, there was no significant difference between observed and predicted fracture risk. In Cox proportional hazards models, FRAX stratified risk of MOF, hip, and any fracture equally well in all subgroups (p-interaction >0.1). When adjusted for FRAX score without BMD, with AI use coded as secondary osteoporosis, AI users were at significantly lower risk for MOF (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.95), hip fracture (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.73) and any fracture (HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.89). AI use was no longer significantly associated with fractures when AI use was not entered as secondary osteoporosis in FRAX without BMD or when BMD was included in the FRAX calculation. In conclusion, FRAX scores stratify fracture risk equally well in women receiving AI therapy as in non-users, but including secondary osteoporosis as a risk factor for AI users overestimates fracture risk. Our results call this practice into question. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
FRAX 用于预测普通人群中 10 年主要骨质疏松性骨折 (MOF) 和髋部骨折的概率。用于乳腺癌的芳香酶抑制剂 (AI) 可导致骨密度 (BMD) 丢失,并报告增加骨折风险。AI 暴露并不是 FRAX 的直接输入,而是被归入“继发性骨质疏松症”。为了告知使用 AI 治疗乳腺癌的女性使用 FRAX,我们使用加拿大马尼托巴省的一个基于人群的登记处,确定了至少接受 12 个月 AI 暴露的开始 AI 治疗乳腺癌的年龄≥40 岁的女性(n=1775)、未接受 AI 治疗的乳腺癌女性(n=1016)和普通人群中的女性(n=34205)。在 AI 使用者中,不包括 BMD 估计的骨折概率(将 AI 用作次要骨质疏松症)显著高估了风险(10 年观察/预测比值为 0.56,95%置信区间 [CI] 为 0.45-0.68;10 年髋部骨折观察/预测比值为 0.33,95%CI 为 0.18-0.49)。然而,当将 BMD 纳入骨折概率时,观察到的和预测的骨折风险之间没有显著差异。在 Cox 比例风险模型中,FRAX 在所有亚组中同样很好地分层了 MOF、髋部和任何骨折的风险(p 交互作用>0.1)。当根据不包括 BMD 的 FRAX 评分进行调整时,将 AI 作为次要骨质疏松症进行编码,AI 使用者发生 MOF(危险比 [HR] = 0.78,95%CI 0.64-0.95)、髋部骨折(HR=0.46,95%CI 0.29-0.73)和任何骨折(HR=0.75,95%CI 0.63-0.89)的风险显著降低。当在不包括 BMD 的 FRAX 中不将 AI 用作次要骨质疏松症或当将 BMD 纳入 FRAX 计算时,AI 使用率不再与骨折显著相关。总之,在接受 AI 治疗的女性和非使用者中,FRAX 评分同样很好地分层了骨折风险,但将 AI 使用者作为次要骨质疏松症的危险因素纳入会高估骨折风险。我们的结果对这种做法提出了质疑。©2019 美国骨骼与矿物质研究协会。