Arrabal-Polo Miguel Angel, Domínguez-Amillo Alejandro, Canales-Casco Nelson, de la Torre-Trillo Javier, Morales Martínez Ana, Cano-García María del Carmen, Rodríguez-Herrera Juan Jesús, Hernández-Serrano Marcelino, Arrabal-Martín Miguel
Servicio de Urología. Hospital Campus de la Salud. Granada. España.
Arch Esp Urol. 2019 May;72(4):353-359.
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is a minimally invasive therapeutic option for the treatment of renal-ureteral lithiasis. The aim of this study was to analyze the results and complications of shock wave extracorporeal lithotripsy treatment with the Dornier Gemini® Generator EMSE 220f-XXP device in patients with renal and ureteral lithiasis.
Retrospective study including 377 patients with renal or ureteral lithiasis with indication for treatment with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. The following variables were analyzed, age, sex, body mass index, lithiasis size, lithiasis location, presence of urinary diversion, number of lithotripsy sessions, number of shock waves, fluoroscopy time, wave energy, applied focal energy coefficient, efficiency coefficient, lithiasic fragmentation, lithiasic clearance, residual lithiasis, presence of lithiasis and complications. The results were analyzed with SPSS 17.0 considering statistical significance p≤0.05.
Of the 377 patients, 213 were men and 164 women, with a mean age of 51.28 ± 12.77 years. The mean size of the stones in maximum diameter was 11.77 ± 6.13 mm. Lithiasis fragmentation occurred in 81.9% of cases, with a percentage of residual lithiasis after the first session of 58.7% and a total or partial expulsion rate of lithiasis fragments of 68.3%, with global success at the end of sessions of lithotripsy of 69.8%. The overall Efficiency Ratio was 0.42, higher in upper calyx 0.51 and lower in medium calyx 0.35, with significant differences (p<0.05). The only differences were found in relation to the success of lithotripsy treatment (75% versus 64.6%, p=0.02), according to lithiasis size (≤10 mm maximum diameter in comparison to >10 mm). In patients with a DJ catheter there is a higher percentage of residual lithiasis (p=0.006).
Treatment with extracorporeal lithotripsy in small lithiasis and in well-selected patients obtains good results with a low rate of complications regardless of sex and body mass index.
体外冲击波碎石术是治疗肾输尿管结石的一种微创治疗选择。本研究的目的是分析使用多尼尔双子座®发生器EMSE 220f - XXP设备对肾输尿管结石患者进行冲击波体外碎石治疗的结果和并发症。
回顾性研究纳入377例有体外冲击波碎石治疗指征的肾或输尿管结石患者。分析以下变量:年龄、性别、体重指数、结石大小、结石位置、是否存在尿流改道、碎石次数、冲击波次数、透视时间、波能量、应用焦点能量系数、效率系数、结石破碎情况、结石清除情况、残余结石、结石存在情况及并发症。使用SPSS 17.0分析结果,以p≤0.05为具有统计学意义。
377例患者中,男性213例,女性164例,平均年龄51.28±12.77岁。结石最大直径的平均大小为11.77±6.13毫米。81.9%的病例发生结石破碎,第一次治疗后残余结石百分比为58.7%,结石碎片的全部或部分排出率为68.3%,碎石治疗结束时的总体成功率为69.8%。总体效率比为0.42,上盏较高为0.51,中盏较低为0.35,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。根据结石大小(最大直径≤10毫米与>10毫米相比),仅在碎石治疗成功率方面发现差异(75%对64.6%,p = 0.02)。留置DJ导管的患者残余结石百分比更高(p = 0.006)。
对小结石且选择合适的患者进行体外碎石治疗可取得良好效果,并发症发生率低,且与性别和体重指数无关。