Suppr超能文献

髌下神经阻滞减轻胫骨钉固定术后慢性前膝痛患者的膝关节疼痛:34 例患者的随机、安慰剂对照试验。

An infrapatellar nerve block reduces knee pain in patients with chronic anterior knee pain after tibial nailing: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 34 patients.

机构信息

a Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC , University Medical Center Rotterdam , Rotterdam.

b Department of Surgery , Gelderse Vallei Hospital , Ede , The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Orthop. 2019 Aug;90(4):377-382. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1613808. Epub 2019 May 9.

Abstract

Background and purpose - Anterior knee pain is common after tibial nailing. Its origin is poorly understood. Injury of the infrapatellar nerve is a possible cause. In this randomized controlled trial we compared changes in knee pain after an infrapatellar nerve block with lidocaine or placebo in patients with persistent knee pain after tibial nailing. Patients and methods - Patients with chronic knee pain after tibial nailing were randomized to an infrapatellar nerve block with 5 ml 2% lidocaine or placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%), after which they performed 8 daily activities. Before and after these activities, pain was recorded using a numeric rating scale (NRS; 0-10). Primary endpoint was the change in pain during kneeling after the infrapatellar nerve block. Secondary outcomes were changes in pain after the nerve block during the other activities. Results - 34 patients (age 18-62 years) were equally randomized. A significant reduction of the NRS for kneeling pain with an infrapatellar nerve block with lidocaine was found compared with placebo (-4.5 [range -10 to -1] versus -1 [-9 to 2]; p = 0.002). There were no differences between the treatments for the NRS values for pain during other activities. Interpretation - Compared with placebo, an infrapatellar nerve block with lidocaine was more effective in reducing pain during kneeling in patients with chronic knee pain after tibial nailing. Our findings support the contention that kneeling pain after tibial nailing is a peripheral nerve-related problem.

摘要

背景与目的 - 胫骨钉固定术后常出现膝关节前侧疼痛,其发病机制尚不清楚。髌下神经损伤可能是其原因之一。在本随机对照试验中,我们比较了胫骨钉固定术后持续性膝关节疼痛患者接受髌下神经阻滞利多卡因或安慰剂治疗后,膝关节疼痛的变化。

患者与方法 - 将胫骨钉固定术后慢性膝关节疼痛的患者随机分为髌下神经阻滞组(5 ml 2%利多卡因或安慰剂[氯化钠 0.9%]),之后进行 8 项日常活动。在这些活动之前和之后,使用数字评分量表(NRS;0-10)记录疼痛。主要终点是髌下神经阻滞后屈膝时疼痛的变化。次要结局是神经阻滞后其他活动时疼痛的变化。

结果 - 34 名(18-62 岁)患者被平均随机分组。与安慰剂相比,髌下神经阻滞利多卡因治疗后屈膝时 NRS 显著降低(-4.5 [范围-10 至-1] 与-1 [-9 至 2];p = 0.002)。与安慰剂相比,其他活动时 NRS 值在两种治疗方法之间没有差异。

结论 - 与安慰剂相比,胫骨钉固定术后慢性膝关节疼痛患者接受髌下神经阻滞利多卡因治疗后,屈膝时疼痛缓解更明显。我们的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即胫骨钉固定术后屈膝疼痛是一种周围神经相关的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a83a/6718177/11a40499df9d/IORT_A_1613808_F0001_C.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验