Suppr超能文献

一种新型的联合超声心动图方法测量整体纵向应变和应变率的可行性和一致性与斑点追踪和组织多普勒成像比较。

Feasibility and agreement of a novel combined echocardiographic method to measure global longitudinal strain and strain rate compared to speckle tracking and tissue Doppler imaging.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Perelman School of Medicine/Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Acta Cardiol. 2020 Jun;75(3):191-199. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2019.1565661. Epub 2019 May 9.

Abstract

Currently, two echocardiographic techniques are used to measure deformation: tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). Recently, a technique combining STE and TDI (on TDI overlay images) has become available, allowing derivation of STE/TDI results from a single acquisition/reading (combined-STE/combined-TDI). We tested the feasibility and agreement of this novel technique to measure left ventricular deformation in the general population compared to STE and TDI. We examined a subsample of 106 consecutive subjects of the Asklepios Study, a population-based random sample of male/female volunteers without overt clinical disease (mean age: 55.9 years). Left ventricular deformation measurements were assessed with transthoracic echocardiography using the combined method, STE and TDI. Almost all deformation parameters significantly differed between all methods. Global systolic longitudinal strain (GS) and strain rate (GSRs) values measured by combined-TDI were significantly higher (GS -17.2% ± 3.0, GSRs -0.9 s ± 0.2) compared to TDI (GS -21.1% ± 2.2, GSRs -1.3 s ± 0.2). Measurements by combined-STE were significantly lower (GS -19.1% ± 2.9, GSRs -1.0 s ± 0.2) compared to STE (GS -18.2% ± 3.0, GSRs -0.9 s ± 0.1). Overall, the smallest differences and highest agreement were observed between STE and combined-STE (GS  = 0.84,  < .001; GSRs  = 0.70,  < .001). The comparison of methods showed different values and poor agreement between the echocardiographic modalities. Regrettably, the combined method does not make it possible to obtain in a single image/measurement results that are comparable to STE and TDI data in the general population.

摘要

目前,有两种超声心动图技术可用于测量变形:组织多普勒成像(TDI)和斑点追踪超声心动图(STE)。最近,一种结合 STE 和 TDI 的技术(在 TDI 叠加图像上)已经可用,允许从单次采集/读取中得出 STE/TDI 结果(联合 STE/联合 TDI)。我们测试了这种新的技术在一般人群中测量左心室变形的可行性和一致性,与 STE 和 TDI 进行了比较。我们检查了 Asklepios 研究的 106 名连续受试者的一个亚样本,该研究是一项基于人群的男性/女性志愿者的随机样本,没有明显的临床疾病(平均年龄:55.9 岁)。使用经胸超声心动图使用联合方法、STE 和 TDI 评估左心室变形测量值。所有方法之间几乎所有变形参数都有显著差异。联合 TDI 测量的整体收缩期纵向应变(GS)和应变率(GSRs)值(GS -17.2%±3.0,GSRs -0.9s±0.2)明显高于 TDI(GS -21.1%±2.2,GSRs -1.3s±0.2)。联合 STE 测量的数值明显低于 STE(GS -19.1%±2.9,GSRs -1.0s±0.2)。总体而言,STE 和联合 STE 之间观察到的差异最小且一致性最高(GS  = 0.84,  < .001;GSRs  = 0.70,  < .001)。方法比较显示,不同的超声心动图模式之间存在不同的数值和较差的一致性。遗憾的是,该联合方法无法在单个图像/测量中获得与一般人群中的 STE 和 TDI 数据可比的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验