Feranec M, Hart R, Kozák T, Komzák M
Ortopedicko-traumatologické oddělení Nemocnice Znojmo.
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019;86(2):136-140.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The elbow is a highly constrained synovial hinge joint that frequently becomes stiff after injury. Grade 4 elbow stiffness (ankylosis) is a strongly limiting factor in the patient s daily activities and is difficult to treat. Hinged external fixation of the elbow provides the advantages of static fixation with the benefits of continued motion of the joint. The goal of our study was to assess the improvement in the range of motion of the elbow after surgical arthrolysis using a posterior extensile approach to the joint with or without using external fixation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixteen patients aged between 19 and 46 years with grade 4 elbow stiffness were operated on. The stiffness was caused by the following pathologies: 7 elbow dislocations, 3 radial head fractures, 4 distal humeral fractures, 2 fracture-dislocations. The average range of motion before surgery was 14° (range 0°-20°). The average interval between primary injury and arthrolysis was 24 months (9-60 months). The clinical assessment before and after the surgery was based on the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). The average follow-up was 30 months (18-50 months). Arthrolysis was completed by application of an external fixator in eight patients. RESULTS A few common complications were observed, including the injury to adjacent neurovascular structures (two cases of temporary irritation of the ulnar nerve, one case of temporary irritation of the radial nerve) and three cases of pin-track infections. None of the patients showed elbow instability. In Group I, in which external fixation was used, the average MEP score increased from 51 points (range, 30 to 70) to 78 points (range, 55 to 90). The average range of motion at the final follow-up was 93° (range, 75°-135°). In Group II, in which no external fixation was used, the average MEP score increased from 53 points (range, 35 to 70) to 76 points (range, 55 to 85). The gain in flexion-extension was 88° (range, 65°-135°). The final improvement in the range of motion depended mostly on the severity of preoperative stiffness and subsequent surgery. DISCUSSION The surgical arthrolysis of the ankylosed elbow is not a procedure commonly performed by majority of hospitals. A precise surgical technique is a prerequisite for success of the procedure. The type of injury did not seem to influence the final result. Articular external fixation potentially provides stability while permitting the movement. CONCLUSIONS Open arthrolysis of a severe elbow contracture results in a substantial gain in motion (with or without using elbow external fixation) and gives reliable long-lasting results. The minimal improvement in motion provided by the hinge fixator does not justify the associated increase in the risk of complications. Key words:stiffed elbow, arthrolysis, external fixation.
研究目的 肘关节是一个高度受限的滑膜铰链关节,受伤后常出现僵硬。4级肘关节僵硬(关节强直)是患者日常活动的严重限制因素,且难以治疗。肘关节铰链式外固定具有静态固定的优点,同时允许关节持续活动。我们研究的目的是评估采用后路扩展性入路对肘关节进行手术松解,无论是否使用外固定,术后肘关节活动范围的改善情况。
材料与方法 对16例年龄在19至46岁之间、肘关节僵硬达4级的患者进行手术。僵硬由以下病变引起:7例肘关节脱位、3例桡骨头骨折、4例肱骨远端骨折、2例骨折脱位。术前平均活动范围为14°(范围0° - 20°)。初次损伤至松解手术的平均间隔时间为24个月(9 - 60个月)。手术前后的临床评估基于梅奥肘关节功能评分(MEPS)。平均随访时间为30个月(18 - 50个月)。8例患者在松解手术时应用了外固定架。
结果 观察到一些常见并发症,包括相邻神经血管结构损伤(2例尺神经暂时刺激、1例桡神经暂时刺激)和3例针道感染。所有患者均未出现肘关节不稳定。在使用外固定的I组中,平均MEP评分从51分(范围30至70分)增至78分(范围55至90分)。末次随访时平均活动范围为93°(范围75° - 135°)。在未使用外固定的II组中,平均MEP评分从53分(范围35至70分)增至76分(范围55至85分)。屈伸活动度增加了88°(范围65° - 135°)。活动范围的最终改善主要取决于术前僵硬的严重程度及后续手术情况。
讨论 多数医院并不常进行肘关节强直的手术松解。精确的手术技术是该手术成功的前提。损伤类型似乎不影响最终结果。关节外固定在允许活动的同时可能提供稳定性。
结论 严重肘关节挛缩的开放性松解手术可显著增加活动度(无论是否使用肘关节外固定),并能取得可靠的长期效果。铰链式固定器带来的活动度最小改善并不足以证明并发症风险的相应增加是合理的。关键词:肘关节僵硬、松解术、外固定