Gutiérrez-Urbón José María, Gil-Navarro María Victoria, Moreno-Ramos Francisco, Núñez-Núñez María, Paño-Pardo José Ramón, Periáñez-Párraga Leonor
Pharmacy Unit, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña.
Pharmacy Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla.
Farm Hosp. 2019 May 1;43(3):94-100. doi: 10.7399/fh.11163.
To identify indicators of hospital use of antimicrobials from the benchmark analysis of consumption data between hospitals at the same level through the collective judgement of a group of experts.
A committee formed by members of the Spanish Societies of Hospital Pharmacy and Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology prepared a proposal of indicators which was submitted to consensus by a panel of 21 experts on infectious diseases, microbiology and antimicrobial therapy, through a modified Delphi method. The panel underwent two rounds of scores by e-mail. Participants assigned a score from 1 (completely disagree) to 9 (completely agree) to the relevance of each indicator in four dimensions: scientific evidence, efficacy and safety, ecological impact and cost. Scores were processed according to the RAND- UCLA method. An indicator was considered to be relevant if at least one dimension other than cost obtained a median score equal to or higher than 7 without disagreement among the panel.
The committee submitted an initial proposal of 14 indicators. After the first round of panel scores, one indicator was ruled out and two were modified for moving on to the second round. Finally, 13 indicators were considered relevant.
Determining indicators of the hospital use of antimicrobial agents based on consumption can allow the antimicrobial stewardship programs to detect any potential problems with the use of antimicrobial agents, and to help guide their efforts in order to implement actions of improvement, as well as to assess the impact of the measures implemented.
通过一组专家的集体判断,从同级医院抗菌药物使用数据的基准分析中确定医院抗菌药物使用指标。
由西班牙医院药学、传染病和临床微生物学会成员组成的委员会制定了一份指标提案,通过改良的德尔菲法提交给由21名传染病、微生物学和抗菌治疗专家组成的小组进行共识。该小组通过电子邮件进行两轮评分。参与者从1(完全不同意)到9(完全同意)对每个指标在科学证据、疗效和安全性、生态影响和成本四个维度的相关性进行评分。根据兰德-加州大学洛杉矶分校方法对分数进行处理。如果除成本外至少有一个维度的中位数得分等于或高于7且小组内无异议,则该指标被认为是相关的。
委员会提交了一份包含14项指标的初始提案。在小组第一轮评分后,排除了一项指标,两项指标进行了修改以便进入第二轮。最终,13项指标被认为是相关的。
基于使用情况确定医院抗菌药物使用指标可以使抗菌药物管理计划检测到抗菌药物使用中的任何潜在问题,并帮助指导其努力以实施改进措施,以及评估所实施措施的影响。