• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将“未能挽救作为移植领域质量改进方法:在小儿肝移植中评估该工具的首次尝试” 作为移植领域质量改进方法:在小儿肝移植中评估该工具的首次尝试。

Failure to Rescue as a Quality Improvement Approach in Transplantation: A First Effort to Evaluate This Tool in Pediatric Liver Transplantation.

作者信息

Cramm Shannon L, Waits Seth A, Englesbe Michael J, Bucuvalas John C, Horslen Simon P, Mazariegos George V, Soltys Kyle A, Anand Ravinder, Magee John C

机构信息

1 Section of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 2 Pediatric Liver Care Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH. 3 Division of Gastroenterology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA. 4 Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 5 The EMMES Corporation, Rockville, MD.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2016 Apr;100(4):801-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001121.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000001121
PMID:26910329
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Significant intercenter variation exists in mortality and death-censored graft loss (DCGL) after transplantation. Failure to rescue (FTR, death after a major complication) is an emerging tool in quality improvement and may underlie this variation. This study is the first effort to investigate the relationship between FTR and outcomes in transplantation to assess its utility in care improvement.

METHODS

Using the Studies of Pediatric Liver Transplantation database, we identified 2330 children undergoing primary liver transplants at 21 centers. Centers were ranked by risk-adjusted mortality and sorted into tertiles. We then compared mortality, complications, and FTR across tertiles.

RESULTS

Overall mortality was 4.9%, ranging from 1.4% to 8.1% in the low and high mortality tertiles (P < 0.01). The low mortality tertile had significantly lower rates of complications (30.9% vs 38.5% and 40.4%, P < 0.01) as well as FTR (4.6% vs 9.9% and 14.3%, P < 0.01). A similar trend was seen in the DCGL analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that although centers with higher mortality and DCGL have more frequent major complications, they exhibit 3-fold the rate of FTR. Efforts to standardize perioperative care, and thus minimize FTR, will have value to pediatric liver transplantation recipients. This preliminary study indicates that FTR may provide a useful quality improvement tool for the field of transplantation and warrants further investigation.

摘要

背景

移植后死亡率和死亡删失移植物丢失(DCGL)存在显著的中心间差异。抢救失败(FTR,重大并发症后死亡)是质量改进中一种新兴工具,可能是造成这种差异的原因。本研究首次探讨FTR与移植结局之间的关系,以评估其在改善护理方面的效用。

方法

利用儿童肝移植研究数据库,我们确定了在21个中心接受初次肝移植的2330名儿童。根据风险调整后的死亡率对中心进行排名,并分为三分位数。然后我们比较了三分位数之间的死亡率、并发症和FTR。

结果

总体死亡率为4.9%,低死亡率和高死亡率三分位数分别为1.4%至8.1%(P<0.01)。低死亡率三分位数的并发症发生率(30.9%对38.5%和40.4%,P<0.01)以及FTR(4.6%对9.9%和14.3%,P<0.01)显著更低。DCGL分析中也观察到类似趋势。

结论

我们的结果表明,尽管死亡率和DCGL较高的中心有更频繁的重大并发症,但它们的FTR发生率是其三倍。标准化围手术期护理的努力,从而尽量减少FTR,对儿童肝移植受者将具有价值。这项初步研究表明,FTR可能为移植领域提供一种有用的质量改进工具,值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Failure to Rescue as a Quality Improvement Approach in Transplantation: A First Effort to Evaluate This Tool in Pediatric Liver Transplantation.将“未能挽救作为移植领域质量改进方法:在小儿肝移植中评估该工具的首次尝试” 作为移植领域质量改进方法:在小儿肝移植中评估该工具的首次尝试。
Transplantation. 2016 Apr;100(4):801-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001121.
2
Variation in hospital mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy is related to failure to rescue rather than major complications: a nationwide audit.胰十二指肠切除术后医院死亡率的差异与未能成功挽救患者有关,而非主要并发症:一项全国性审计。
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Aug;20(8):759-767. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.02.640. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
3
Sarcopenia and failure to rescue following liver transplantation.肝移植后的肌肉减少症与未挽救成功
Clin Transplant. 2015 Dec;29(12):1076-80. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12629. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
4
Complications and Failure to Rescue After Inpatient Noncardiac Surgery in the Veterans Affairs Health System.退伍军人事务部医疗体系中住院非心脏手术后的并发症和抢救失败。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Dec 1;151(12):1157-1165. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2920.
5
"Failure to Rescue" as a Novel Quality Metric in Pediatric Liver Transplantation.“未能挽救”作为小儿肝移植中一种新的质量指标
Transplantation. 2016 Apr;100(4):707. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001122.
6
Failure to rescue and mortality following repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.腹主动脉瘤修复术后的抢救失败与死亡率
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;59(4):909-914.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.078. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
7
Failure to rescue trends in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair between 1995 and 2011.1995年至2011年间择期腹主动脉瘤修复术中未能成功挽救的趋势。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Dec;60(6):1473-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.106. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
8
Hospital variation in failure to rescue after colorectal cancer surgery: results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit.荷兰外科结直肠审计:结直肠癌手术后未能抢救的医院差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jul;20(7):2117-23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2896-7. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
9
Understanding Failure to Rescue After Esophagectomy in the United States.理解美国食管癌手术后的抢救失败。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Mar;109(3):865-871. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.044. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
10
Comparing Preoperative Targets to Failure-to-Rescue for Surgical Mortality Improvement.比较术前目标与未能挽救以改善手术死亡率。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jun;220(6):1096-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.036. Epub 2015 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Center variation in long-term outcomes for socioeconomically deprived children.社会经济地位低下儿童的长期结局存在中心差异。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Sep;21(9):3123-3132. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16529. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
A learning health network for pediatric liver transplantation: Inaugural meeting report from the Starzl Network for Excellence in Pediatric Transplantation.小儿肝移植学习健康网络:来自施塔兹小儿移植卓越网络的首次会议报告
Pediatr Transplant. 2019 Sep;23(6):e13528. doi: 10.1111/petr.13528. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
3
Failure to rescue in surgical patients: A review for acute care surgeons.
手术患者的抢救失败:急性护理外科医生的综述。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Sep;87(3):699-706. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002365.
4
Failure to rescue as a center-level metric in pediatric trauma.未能抢救作为儿科创伤的中级指标。
Surgery. 2019 Jun;165(6):1116-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 May 7.
5
Procedure-Specific Volume and Nurse-to-Patient Ratio: Implications for Failure to Rescue Patients Following Liver Surgery.特定手术的手术量及护士与患者比例:对肝切除术后患者未被成功救治的影响
World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):910-919. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4859-4.
6
Quality Metrics in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review.实体器官移植中的质量指标:系统评价。
Transplantation. 2018 Jul;102(7):e308-e330. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002149.
7
Predicting early outcomes of liver transplantation in young children: The EARLY study.预测幼儿肝移植的早期结局:EARLY研究。
World J Hepatol. 2018 Jan 27;10(1):62-72. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i1.62.
8
Living Donor Liver Transplantation in South Asia: Single Center Experience on Intermediate-Term Outcomes.南亚活体肝移植:单中心中期结果经验
World J Surg. 2018 Apr;42(4):1111-1119. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4259-1.