Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London WC1B 5EH, United Kingdom;
Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 28;116(22):11020-11027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818978116. Epub 2019 May 9.
Understanding the mode of action of drugs is a challenge with conventional methods in clinical trials. Here, we aimed to explore whether simvastatin effects on brain atrophy and disability in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) are mediated by reducing cholesterol or are independent of cholesterol. We applied structural equation models to the MS-STAT trial in which 140 patients with SPMS were randomized to receive placebo or simvastatin. At baseline, after 1 and 2 years, patients underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging; their cognitive and physical disability were assessed on the block design test and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and serum total cholesterol levels were measured. We calculated the percentage brain volume change (brain atrophy). We compared two models to select the most likely one: a cholesterol-dependent model with a cholesterol-independent model. The cholesterol-independent model was the most likely option. When we deconstructed the total treatment effect into indirect effects, which were mediated by brain atrophy, and direct effects, simvastatin had a direct effect (independent of serum cholesterol) on both the EDSS, which explained 69% of the overall treatment effect on EDSS, and brain atrophy, which, in turn, was responsible for 31% of the total treatment effect on EDSS [β = -0.037; 95% credible interval (CI) = -0.075, -0.010]. This suggests that simvastatin's beneficial effects in MS are independent of its effect on lowering peripheral cholesterol levels, implicating a role for upstream intermediate metabolites of the cholesterol synthesis pathway. Importantly, it demonstrates that computational models can elucidate the causal architecture underlying treatment effects in clinical trials of progressive MS.
理解药物的作用模式是临床试验中常规方法面临的挑战。在这里,我们旨在探索辛伐他汀对继发进展型多发性硬化症(SPMS)患者脑萎缩和残疾的影响是否通过降低胆固醇来实现,或者是否与胆固醇无关。我们将结构方程模型应用于 MS-STAT 试验,该试验将 140 名 SPMS 患者随机分为安慰剂组或辛伐他汀组。在基线、治疗 1 年和 2 年时,患者接受脑磁共振成像检查;采用方块设计测试和扩展残疾状况量表(EDSS)评估他们的认知和身体残疾情况,并测量血清总胆固醇水平。我们计算脑容量变化百分比(脑萎缩)。我们比较了两个模型以选择最有可能的模型:一个是依赖胆固醇的模型,另一个是不依赖胆固醇的模型。不依赖胆固醇的模型是最有可能的选择。当我们将总治疗效果分解为通过脑萎缩介导的间接效果和直接效果时,辛伐他汀对 EDSS 有直接影响(与血清胆固醇无关),这解释了 EDSS 总治疗效果的 69%,对脑萎缩也有直接影响,脑萎缩反过来又对 EDSS 的总治疗效果负责 31%[β=-0.037;95%可信区间(CI)=-0.075,-0.010]。这表明,辛伐他汀在多发性硬化症中的有益作用与其降低外周胆固醇水平的作用无关,提示胆固醇合成途径的上游中间代谢物可能发挥作用。重要的是,它表明计算模型可以阐明渐进性多发性硬化症临床试验中治疗效果的因果结构。