• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术先导和可行性研究方案的价值。

Value of surgical pilot and feasibility study protocols.

机构信息

Centre for Surgical Research and Medical Research Council (MRC) ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2019 Jul;106(8):968-978. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11167. Epub 2019 May 10.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.11167
PMID:31074503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6618315/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

RCTs in surgery are challenging owing to well established methodological issues. Well designed pilot and feasibility studies (PFS) may help overcome such issues to inform successful main trial design and conduct. This study aimed to analyse protocols of UK-funded studies to explore current use of PFS in surgery and identify areas for practice improvement.

METHODS

PFS of surgical interventions funded by UK National Institute for Health Research programmes from 2005 to 2015 were identified, and original study protocols and associated publications sourced. Data extracted included study design characteristics, reasons for performing the work including perceived uncertainties around conducting a definitive main trial, and whether the studies had been published.

RESULTS

Thirty-five surgical studies were identified, of which 29 were randomized, and over half (15 of 29) included additional methodological components (such as qualitative work examining recruitment, and participant surveys studying current interventions). Most studies focused on uncertainties around recruitment (32 of 35), with far fewer tackling uncertainties specific to surgery, such as intervention stability, implementation or delivery (10 of 35). Only half (19 of 35) had made their results available publicly, to date.

CONCLUSION

The full potential of pretrial work to inform and optimize definitive surgical studies is not being realized.

摘要

背景

由于已确立的方法学问题,外科手术中的 RCT 具有挑战性。精心设计的试验前和可行性研究(PFS)可能有助于克服这些问题,为成功的主要试验设计和实施提供信息。本研究旨在分析英国资助的研究方案,以探讨当前外科手术中 PFS 的使用情况,并确定实践改进的领域。

方法

确定了英国国家卫生研究院(NIHR)从 2005 年至 2015 年资助的外科干预措施的 PFS,并找到了原始研究方案和相关出版物。提取的数据包括研究设计特征、开展工作的原因,包括对进行确定性主要试验的不确定性的认识,以及这些研究是否已发表。

结果

确定了 35 项外科研究,其中 29 项为随机研究,超过一半(29 项中的 15 项)包括其他方法学组成部分(如检查招募的定性工作,以及研究当前干预措施的参与者调查)。大多数研究集中在招募方面的不确定性(35 项中的 32 项),而很少有研究针对手术特定的不确定性,如干预的稳定性、实施或交付(35 项中的 10 项)。迄今为止,只有一半(35 项中的 19 项)公开了他们的结果。

结论

未充分实现试验前工作为确定性外科研究提供信息和优化的全部潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c7/6618315/b8c68507178f/BJS-106-968-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c7/6618315/1f2786c8acad/BJS-106-968-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c7/6618315/b8c68507178f/BJS-106-968-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c7/6618315/1f2786c8acad/BJS-106-968-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c7/6618315/b8c68507178f/BJS-106-968-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Value of surgical pilot and feasibility study protocols.手术先导和可行性研究方案的价值。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jul;106(8):968-978. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11167. Epub 2019 May 10.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Role of feasibility and pilot studies in randomised controlled trials: a cross-sectional study.可行性研究和预试验在随机对照试验中的作用:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 25;8(9):e022233. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022233.
4
Health screening clinic to reduce absenteeism and presenteeism among NHS Staff: eTHOS a pilot RCT.健康筛查门诊减少 NHS 员工旷工和出勤主义:eTHOS 一项试点 RCT。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(23):1-105. doi: 10.3310/KDST3869.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Different corticosteroid induction regimens in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the SIRJIA mixed-methods feasibility study.不同皮质类固醇诱导方案在儿童和青少年幼年特发性关节炎中的应用:SIRJIA 混合方法可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jul;24(36):1-152. doi: 10.3310/hta24360.
7
Enhanced psychological care in cardiac rehabilitation services for patients with new-onset depression: the CADENCE feasibility study and pilot RCT.心脏康复服务中新发抑郁症患者强化心理护理:CADENCE 可行性研究和初步 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 May;22(30):1-220. doi: 10.3310/hta22300.
8
Three wound-dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: the Bluebelle feasibility study and pilot RCT.三种减少腹部手术后手术部位感染的伤口处理策略:Bluebelle 可行性研究和初步 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(39):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta23390.
9
Carer administration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for breakthrough symptoms in people dying at home: the CARiAD feasibility RCT.居家临终患者按需皮下注射治疗突破性症状的照护者管理:CARiAD 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 May;24(25):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta24250.
10
Delivering successful randomized controlled trials in surgery: Methods to optimize collaboration and study design.开展成功的外科随机对照试验:优化合作与研究设计的方法。
Clin Trials. 2017 Apr;14(2):211-218. doi: 10.1177/1740774516687272. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring to guide surgery in renal hyperparathyroidism (PEREGRINE): a protocol for a randomised multiarm surgical pilot trial.术中甲状旁腺激素监测指导肾性甲状旁腺功能亢进手术(PEREGRINE):一项随机多臂手术试点试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 17;15(7):e098860. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098860.
2
AMPDECIDE amputation level patient decision aids: a feasibility study.AMPDECIDE截肢水平患者决策辅助工具:一项可行性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03084-7.
3
PErioperative respiratory care aNd outcomes for patients underGoing hIgh risk abdomiNal surgery (PENGUIN): a randomised international internal pilot trial.

本文引用的文献

1
No Surgical Innovation Without Evaluation: Evolution and Further Development of the IDEAL Framework and Recommendations.没有评估就没有外科创新:IDEAL 框架的演变和进一步发展及建议。
Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):211-220. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002794.
2
Do feasibility studies contribute to, or avoid, waste in research?进行可行性研究有助于避免研究中的浪费吗?
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 23;13(4):e0195951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195951. eCollection 2018.
3
Pilot and feasibility studies come of age!试点研究和可行性研究已然成熟!
高危腹部手术患者围手术期呼吸护理与结局(企鹅研究):一项随机国际内部预试验
BJA Open. 2025 Apr 10;14:100396. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100396. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Methodological standards in the design and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in emergency medicine literature: a systematic review.方法学标准在急诊医学文献中设计和报告的初步研究和可行性研究:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 11;14(11):e082648. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082648.
5
Adaptive clinical trials in surgery: A scoping review of methodological and reporting quality.手术中的适应性临床试验:方法学和报告质量的范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 May 28;19(5):e0299494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299494. eCollection 2024.
6
REporting quality of PilOt randomised controlled trials in surgery (REPORTS): a methodological survey protocol.外科试点随机对照试验报告质量(REPORTS):一项方法学调查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 23;14(4):e085293. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085293.
7
Recommendations for optimising pilot and feasibility work in surgery.优化外科手术试点及可行性研究工作的建议。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Apr 18;10(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01489-1.
8
How do pilot and feasibility studies inform randomised placebo-controlled trials in surgery? A systematic review.如何通过先导和可行性研究为外科手术中的随机安慰剂对照试验提供信息?系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 20;13(11):e071094. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071094.
9
Determining the Effectiveness of Fibrin Sealants in Reducing Complications in Patients Undergoing Lateral Neck Dissection (DEFeND): A Randomised External Pilot Trial.确定纤维蛋白封闭剂在减少侧颈清扫术患者并发症方面的有效性(DEFeND):一项随机外部试点试验。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 20;15(20):5073. doi: 10.3390/cancers15205073.
10
Methods of Recruitment for Surgical and Perioperative Randomized Controlled Trials: A Rapid Review.外科及围手术期随机对照试验的招募方法:快速综述
World J Surg. 2023 Nov;47(11):2659-2667. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07124-z. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015;1(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2055-5784-1-1. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
4
Progress in clinical research in surgery and IDEAL.外科临床研究进展和 IDEAL。
Lancet. 2018 Jul 7;392(10141):88-94. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30102-8. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
5
McCall Culdoplasty during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.麦卡(McCall)子宫圆韧带悬吊术在全腹腔镜子宫切除术的应用:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 May-Jun;25(4):670-678. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.036. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
6
A prospective randomized pilot study evaluating an ERAS protocol versus a standard protocol for patients treated with radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer.一项前瞻性随机试点研究,评估用于膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术和尿流改道患者的加速康复外科(ERAS)方案与标准方案。
World J Urol. 2018 Feb;36(2):215-220. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2109-2. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
7
Sutureless, Glue-less Conjunctival Autograft versus Conjunctival Autograft with Sutures for Primary, Advanced Pterygia: An Interventional Pilot study.无缝合、无胶水结膜自体移植术与带缝线结膜自体移植术治疗原发性晚期翼状胬肉的介入性初步研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Aug;11(8):NC04-NC07. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23839.10419. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
8
Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies.为高效随机对照试验提供信息:探索内部预试验进展标准制定中的挑战。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 17;7(2):e013537. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013537.
9
Delivering successful randomized controlled trials in surgery: Methods to optimize collaboration and study design.开展成功的外科随机对照试验:优化合作与研究设计的方法。
Clin Trials. 2017 Apr;14(2):211-218. doi: 10.1177/1740774516687272. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
10
The curious case of an internal pilot in a multicentre randomised trial-time for a rethink?多中心随机试验中内部预试验的奇特案例——是时候重新思考了?
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Dec 13;2:73. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0113-8. eCollection 2016.