• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国大学英语四、六级考试人工智能写作评估系统的实证研究

An Empirical Study on the Artificial Intelligence Writing Evaluation System in China CET.

机构信息

School of Foreign Language Studies, Xi'an University, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Big Data. 2019 Jun;7(2):121-129. doi: 10.1089/big.2018.0151. Epub 2019 May 10.

DOI:10.1089/big.2018.0151
PMID:31074642
Abstract

The Artificial Intelligence Writing Evaluation system is widely used in China College English writing. It provides for both teachers and the English learners services of automated composition evaluation on the net in order that teacher's working load can be reduced and they can learn directly about the students' English writing level and that the students' English writing will be improved. Juku automated writing evaluation (AWE) is one of the most used systems among colleges and universities in China. The empirical study was conducted on the use of Juku AWE in college English teaching. Through the experiment with 114 students from 2 classes in Xi'an University and questionnaires and interview for both 30 teachers and 200 students using Juku AWE, the author finds that: (1) Using AWE does effectively help the students with their English writing; (2) Both teachers and students have positive attitude to the use of AWE in terms of immediate and clear feedback, time-saving, and arousing interests in English writing; and (3) AWE still needs to be perfected as it cannot provide proper evaluation on the text structure, content logic, and coherence. So both teachers and students should take the score from AWE objectively.

摘要

人工智能写作评估系统在中国的大学英语写作中得到了广泛应用。它为教师和英语学习者提供了网络自动化作文评估服务,以便减轻教师的工作量,使他们能够直接了解学生的英语写作水平,提高学生的英语写作水平。句酷批改网(Juku)自动写作评估(AWE)是中国高校最常用的系统之一。本研究对句酷批改网在大学英语教学中的应用进行了实证研究。通过对西安大学两个班的 114 名学生进行实验,以及对使用句酷批改网的 30 名教师和 200 名学生进行问卷调查和访谈,作者发现:(1)使用 AWE 确实有助于学生的英语写作;(2)教师和学生对 AWE 的使用都持积极态度,认为它能提供及时、清晰的反馈,节省时间,激发英语写作兴趣;(3)AWE 仍需完善,因为它不能对文本结构、内容逻辑和连贯性进行适当的评估。因此,教师和学生都应该客观地看待 AWE 的分数。

相似文献

1
An Empirical Study on the Artificial Intelligence Writing Evaluation System in China CET.中国大学英语四、六级考试人工智能写作评估系统的实证研究
Big Data. 2019 Jun;7(2):121-129. doi: 10.1089/big.2018.0151. Epub 2019 May 10.
2
The English Teaching Methods in the Field of Public Health in Colleges and Universities Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology.高校公共卫生领域人工智能技术下的英语教学方法。
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;2022:1995924. doi: 10.1155/2022/1995924. eCollection 2022.
3
Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance the writing of english academic papers by non-native english-speaking medical students - the educational application of ChatGPT.探讨人工智能在提高非英语母语医学专业学生英文学术论文写作能力方面的潜力——ChatGPT 的教育应用。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05738-y.
4
From process to product: writing engagement and performance of EFL learners under computer-generated feedback instruction.从过程到成果:计算机生成反馈指导下的外语学习者写作参与度与表现
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 23;14:1258286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1258286. eCollection 2023.
5
ChatGPT for Automated Writing Evaluation in Scholarly Writing Instruction.ChatGPT 在学术写作教学中的自动化写作评估。
J Nurs Educ. 2023 Dec;62(12):721-727. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20231006-02. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
6
Automated feedback and writing: a multi-level meta-analysis of effects on students' performance.自动化反馈与写作:对学生成绩影响的多层次元分析
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Jul 3;6:1162454. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1162454. eCollection 2023.
7
How to incorporate and evaluate writing skills in animal science and dairy science courses.如何在动物科学和乳品科学课程中融入并评估写作技能。
J Anim Sci. 1996 Nov;74(11):2835-42. doi: 10.2527/1996.74112835x.
8
Peer feedback and Chinese medical students' English academic writing development: a longitudinal intervention study.同伴反馈与中国医学生英语学术写作能力发展:一项纵向干预研究
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Aug 16;23(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04574-w.
9
A needs analysis of ESP courses in colleges of art and design: Consensus and divergence.ESP 课程在艺术设计学院的需求分析:共识与分歧。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 11;19(6):e0305210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305210. eCollection 2024.
10
The impact of automated writing evaluation on second language writing skills of Chinese EFL learners: a randomized controlled trial.自动写作评估对中国英语学习者第二语言写作技能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 29;14:1249991. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1249991. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated feedback and writing: a multi-level meta-analysis of effects on students' performance.自动化反馈与写作:对学生成绩影响的多层次元分析
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Jul 3;6:1162454. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1162454. eCollection 2023.
2
Interactive Design Psychology and Artificial Intelligence-Based Innovative Exploration of Anglo-American Traumatic Narrative Literature.基于交互式设计心理学与人工智能的英美创伤叙事文学创新探索
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 10;12:755039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.755039. eCollection 2021.