Suppr超能文献

电子病历医嘱录入式教育干预对降低门诊放射科加急医嘱无效。

An Electronic Health Record Order Entry-Enabled Educational Intervention Is Not Effective in Reducing STAT Inpatient Radiology Orders.

机构信息

Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Aug;16(8):1018-1026. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.01.033. Epub 2019 May 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Assess whether introducing order priorities with defined performance expectations in the electronic health record (EHR) reduces immediate inpatient radiology orders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective study was performed at a 776-bed academic hospital conducting 164,000+ inpatient radiology examinations annually. Study period was January 2, 2017, to July 23, 2017; 14 weeks pre- and postimplementation of an education-only intervention including replacing urgent and as soon as possible priorities with imaging within next 6, 12, or 24 hours; imaging in the morning; and required for discharge priorities. STAT routine, timed, today order priorities remained unchanged. Institution-wide training immediately pre- and postimplementation was provided through two waves of e-mail and electronic tip sheets. Primary outcome measure was total STAT studies ordered of total radiology studies ordered per week (STAT rate). Secondary outcomes were non-STAT, non-routine (non-SR) order rate, and routine order rate. Paired t test and statistical process control (SPC) analysis were performed.

RESULTS

STAT rate pre- (22.5%, 7,150 STAT of 31,765 total; weeks 1-14) and postintervention (23.4%, 7,481 STAT of 32,034 total; weeks 16-29) remained unchanged (P = .37). SPC demonstrated no special cause variation. Postintervention non-SR rate increased 3-fold (2.7%, 859 non-SR of 31,765 total pre-intervention versus 8.2%, 2,615 non-SR of 32,034 total postintervention; 8.2%/2.7% = 3.0; P < .0001). There was an 8.8% relative reduction in routine rate postintervention (73.9%, 23,471 routine of 31,765 total pre-intervention; 67.4%, 21,579 routine of 32,034 total postintervention; (73.9% - 67.4%)/73.9% × 100 = 8.8%; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Implementing ordering priorities with defined performance expectations in the EHR reduced routine but did not reduce STAT inpatient radiology orders. More stringent interventions may be needed to reduce unnecessary STAT inpatient radiology ordering to improve use of limited imaging resources.

摘要

目的

评估在电子健康记录(EHR)中引入具有明确绩效预期的医嘱优先级是否会减少即时住院放射科医嘱。

材料和方法

本研究经机构审查委员会批准,是在一家拥有 776 张床位的学术医院中进行的,每年进行 164,000 多次住院放射科检查。研究期间为 2017 年 1 月 2 日至 2017 年 7 月 23 日;在实施仅教育干预措施的 14 周前和后,该干预措施包括将紧急和尽快改为影像检查在接下来的 6、12 或 24 小时内进行;早上进行影像学检查;并要求进行出院前的优先级检查。STAT 常规、定时、今日医嘱优先级保持不变。在实施前后,通过两波电子邮件和电子提示单在全机构范围内提供了培训。主要观察指标为每周总 STAT 研究与总放射科研究的比值(STAT 率)。次要观察指标为非 STAT、非常规(非 SR)医嘱率和常规医嘱率。采用配对 t 检验和统计过程控制(SPC)分析。

结果

干预前(22.5%,7150 项 STAT 研究占 31765 项总研究;第 1-14 周)和干预后(23.4%,7481 项 STAT 研究占 32034 项总研究;第 16-29 周)的 STAT 率保持不变(P=0.37)。SPC 显示无特殊原因变化。干预后非 SR 率增加了 3 倍(2.7%,859 项非 SR 研究占 31765 项总研究,而干预后 8.2%,2615 项非 SR 研究占 32034 项总研究;8.2%/2.7%=3.0;P<0.0001)。干预后常规医嘱率相对降低了 8.8%(73.9%,23471 项常规医嘱研究占 31765 项总研究,而干预后 67.4%,21579 项常规医嘱研究占 32034 项总研究;(73.9%-67.4%)/73.9%×100=8.8%;P<0.0001)。

结论

在 EHR 中实施具有明确绩效预期的医嘱优先级减少了常规医嘱,但并未减少即时住院放射科医嘱。可能需要更严格的干预措施来减少不必要的即时住院放射科医嘱,以改善有限的影像学资源的利用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验