Resident, Institute of Stomatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
Resident, Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, PR China.
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jan;123(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.012. Epub 2019 May 10.
Osseointegrated implants can be prone to occlusal overloading because of the absence of the periodontal ligament and limited tactile sensitivity. However, current scientific evidence of the occlusion variation of implant-supported fixed prostheses is lacking.
The purpose of this clinical study was to analyze changes in occlusal force distribution and occlusal contact in single posterior partial fixed implant-supported prostheses over time.
Partially edentulous patients who had received implant-supported single crowns in the posterior region between December 2012 and December 2013 were enrolled. The participants underwent occlusal examinations by using the T-Scan III system at 0.5, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after implant prosthesis delivery. The relative occlusal forces (ROFs) of implant prostheses, mesial adjacent teeth, and control natural teeth were recorded, and implant prosthesis occlusion time ratios were calculated. The paired t test was used to compare the implant prosthesis occlusion time ratios and ROFs of implant prostheses at 2 different times as a self-control. The differences in ROFs between implant prostheses and control teeth in the same participant at the same time were also analyzed by using a paired t test. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the statistical correlation between implant prosthesis occlusal force and the implant prosthesis occlusion time ratio (α=.05).
Thirty-seven posterior partial fixed implant-supported prostheses in 33 participants (18 women and 15 men aged 23.9 to 70 years) were followed up for 3 to 36 months (mean: 31.4 months). The ROFs of implant prostheses increased significantly (P<.05) from 2 weeks (7.46 ±4.21%) to 3 months (9.87 ±6.79%), whereas those of control natural teeth decreased significantly (P<.05) from 13.78 ±6.00% to 11.43 ±5.47%. The ROFs of implant prostheses continued to increase from 6 to 12 months and from 12 to 24 months, with significant differences (P<.05). However, they were statistically similar to those of control natural teeth at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after restoration. Implant prosthesis occlusion time ratios also increased significantly between 2 weeks and 3 months and between 3 and 6 months (P<.05). No significant differences were found between the other time points (P>.05).
The occlusal force and occlusal contact time of implant prostheses changed significantly with time.
由于牙周韧带的缺失和触觉敏感性有限,骨整合种植体可能容易受到咬合超负荷的影响。然而,目前缺乏关于种植体支持的固定修复体的咬合变化的科学证据。
本临床研究的目的是分析单颗后牙部分固定种植体支持修复体的咬合力分布和咬合接触随时间的变化。
2012 年 12 月至 2013 年 12 月期间,在后部接受种植体支持的单冠修复的部分缺牙患者入组。在植入物修复体交付后 0.5、3、6、12、24 和 36 个月,参与者使用 T-Scan III 系统进行咬合检查。记录种植体修复体、近中相邻牙和对照天然牙的相对咬合力(ROF),并计算种植体修复体的咬合时间比。使用配对 t 检验比较同一患者在不同时间的种植体修复体的咬合时间比和种植体修复体的 ROF,作为自身对照。还通过配对 t 检验分析同一参与者同一时间种植体修复体与对照牙之间 ROF 的差异。使用 Pearson 相关系数分析种植体咬合力与种植体修复体咬合时间比之间的统计相关性(α=.05)。
33 名参与者(18 名女性和 15 名男性,年龄 23.9 至 70 岁)的 37 个后牙部分固定种植体支持修复体随访 3 至 36 个月(平均:31.4 个月)。种植体修复体的 ROF 从 2 周(7.46±4.21%)显著增加(P<.05)至 3 个月(9.87±6.79%),而对照天然牙的 ROF 从 13.78±6.00%显著降低(P<.05)至 11.43±5.47%。种植体修复体的 ROF 从 6 个月到 12 个月和从 12 个月到 24 个月继续增加,差异具有统计学意义(P<.05)。然而,它们在修复后 6、12、24 和 36 个月与对照天然牙的 ROF 统计学上相似。种植体修复体的咬合时间比也在 2 周和 3 个月以及 3 个月和 6 个月之间显著增加(P<.05)。在其他时间点没有发现显著差异(P>.05)。
种植体修复体的咬合力和咬合接触时间随时间显著变化。