Department of Animal Science, McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada.
Department of Animal Science, McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada; Dipartimento di Agraria, Università degli Studi di Sassari, 017100 Sassari SS, Italy.
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Jul;102(7):6508-6517. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15859. Epub 2019 May 10.
Dairy cow lying behavior is useful in determining the cow's level of welfare, as well as in determining how her environment may affect her comfort and ease of movement. In tiestall systems, cows usually remain in a stall for the duration of their lactation. The dry period offers a unique opportunity to provide alternative housing to the cow with minimal effects on farm housing and management. Our objective was to determine whether housing tiestall cows in deep-bedded pens over an 8-wk dry period altered lying time, lying and rising ability, or lying postures. At dry-off, 20 cows, paired by parity and calving date, were randomly assigned to a deep-bedded loose pen (LP) or a tiestall (TS). Leg-mounted pedometers measured lying time. Rising and lying ability were measured using 6 events of rising and lying from 24-h video recordings taken once a week per cow. Sequenced images (1/min) from the 24-h recordings were used to document lying postures and locations for each cow. Data were analyzed for the early (first week of dry-off), mid, and late (week before calving) terms of the dry period. Lying time did not differ between LP and TS but was numerically higher for LP than TS cows (14.4 vs. 13.0 h/d, respectively). Contact with stall or pen confines when lying down was 5 times higher in TS than LP. The increased contact, coupled with a higher occurrence of hindquarter shifting in the late term, led to higher overall abnormal lying behaviors in TS. Contact with the stall upon rising increased in the late term for TS cows. Cows housed in loose pens also exhibited greater variation in hind-leg postures, keeping legs tucked 20% less often in favor of alternative postures. Stall hardware (e.g., tie rail, dividers) may have affected the ease of transition between lying and standing, leading to higher levels of contact with the stall. Loose-pen cows are able to assume more postures than TS cows when provided more space, possibly allowing them to orient themselves in ways that provide greater comfort. Lying surface in the deep-bedded loose pen may ease the cow's lying-down and rising movements and lead to the higher lying time found with LP cows. Overall, aspects of the stall largely contributed to differences in lying behaviors, warranting further study into whether freestall systems would yield similar outcomes. Improving our concept of ease of movement related to lying and quality of rest in dairy cows, through evaluating lying behaviors in different housing systems, allows for better recommendations on viable alternative housing options.
奶牛卧姿行为可用于评估奶牛的福利水平,还可用于判断其环境舒适度和行动便利性。在牛卧床系统中,奶牛通常在整个哺乳期都待在牛卧床里。干奶期为提供替代牛卧床的方案提供了独特的机会,对农场的牛舍和管理的影响最小。我们的目标是确定在干奶期的 8 周内,将卧床饲养的奶牛安置在深垫料散栏中是否会改变奶牛的卧息时间、卧起能力或卧姿。在干奶时,将 20 头按胎次和产犊日期配对的奶牛随机分配到深垫料散栏(LP)或牛卧床(TS)中。腿部安装的计步器测量卧息时间。使用每头牛每周拍摄一次的 24 小时视频记录中的 6 次卧起事件,测量卧起和卧息能力。使用 24 小时记录的顺序图像(每分钟 1 张)记录每头奶牛的卧姿和位置。数据在干奶期的早期(干奶第一周)、中期和晚期(临产前一周)进行分析。LP 和 TS 之间的卧息时间没有差异,但 LP 奶牛的卧息时间略高于 TS 奶牛(分别为 14.4 和 13.0 小时/天)。TS 奶牛卧床或牛栏接触的次数是 LP 奶牛的 5 倍。这种增加的接触,加上后期后躯移动的发生率增加,导致 TS 奶牛的整体异常卧息行为增加。TS 奶牛在后期起立时与牛卧床的接触增加。安置在散栏中的奶牛的后肢姿势也有更大的变化,将腿收起的情况减少了 20%,转而采用其他姿势。牛卧床的硬件(例如,系绳轨、分隔器)可能会影响卧起之间的转换难易度,导致与牛卧床接触的次数增加。当提供更多空间时,散栏奶牛能够采用更多的卧姿,可能使它们能够以提供更大舒适度的方式调整自己的姿势。深垫料散栏中的卧息表面可能使奶牛的卧下和起卧动作更加容易,从而导致 LP 奶牛的卧息时间更长。总体而言,牛卧床的各个方面在很大程度上导致了卧息行为的差异,这需要进一步研究自由卧栏系统是否会产生类似的结果。通过评估不同牛舍系统中的卧息行为,改善我们对奶牛卧息和休息质量相关的行动便利性的理解,可为可行的替代牛舍方案提供更好的建议。