Nielsen Søren Saxmose, Alvarez Julio, Bicout Dominique Joseph, Calistri Paolo, Canali Elisabetta, Drewe Julian Ashley, Garin-Bastuji Bruno, Gonzales Rojas Jose Luis, Gortázar Schmidt Christian, Herskin Mette, Michel Virginie, Miranda Chueca Miguel Ángel, Padalino Barbara, Roberts Helen Clare, Spoolder Hans, Stahl Karl, Velarde Antonio, Viltrop Arvo, De Boyer des Roches Alice, Jensen Margit Bak, Mee John, Green Martin, Thulke Hans-Hermann, Bailly-Caumette Elea, Candiani Denise, Lima Eliana, Van der Stede Yves, Winckler Christoph
EFSA J. 2023 May 16;21(5):e07993. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7993. eCollection 2023 May.
This Scientific Opinion addresses a European Commission's mandate on the welfare of dairy cows as part of the Farm to Fork strategy. It includes three assessments carried out based on literature reviews and complemented by expert opinion. Assessment 1 describes the most prevalent housing systems for dairy cows in Europe: tie-stalls, cubicle housing, open-bedded systems and systems with access to an outdoor area. Per each system, the scientific opinion describes the distribution in the EU and assesses the main strengths, weaknesses and hazards potentially reducing the welfare of dairy cows. Assessment 2 addresses five welfare consequences as requested in the mandate: locomotory disorders (including lameness), mastitis, restriction of movement and resting problems, inability to perform comfort behaviour and metabolic disorders. Per each welfare consequence, a set of animal-based measures is suggested, a detailed analysis of the prevalence in different housing systems is provided, and subsequently, a comparison of the housing systems is given. Common and specific system-related hazards as well as management-related hazards and respective preventive measures are investigated. Assessment 3 includes an analysis of farm characteristics (e.g. milk yield, herd size) that could be used to classify the level of on-farm welfare. From the available scientific literature, it was not possible to derive relevant associations between available farm data and cow welfare. Therefore, an approach based on expert knowledge elicitation (EKE) was developed. The EKE resulted in the identification of five farm characteristics (more than one cow per cubicle at maximum stocking density, limited space for cows, inappropriate cubicle size, high on-farm mortality and farms with less than 2 months access to pasture). If one or more of these farm characteristics are present, it is recommended to conduct an assessment of cow welfare on the farm in question using animal-based measures for specified welfare consequences.
本科学意见涉及欧盟委员会关于奶牛福利的授权,这是“从农场到餐桌”战略的一部分。它包括三项基于文献综述并辅以专家意见开展的评估。评估1描述了欧洲最普遍的奶牛饲养系统:拴系牛舍、隔栏牛舍、开放式卧床系统以及可进入户外区域的系统。针对每个系统,该科学意见描述了其在欧盟的分布情况,并评估了可能降低奶牛福利的主要优点、缺点和风险。评估2针对授权要求的五项福利后果进行探讨:运动障碍(包括跛足)、乳腺炎、行动和休息受限问题、无法表现舒适行为以及代谢紊乱。针对每项福利后果,建议了一系列基于动物的措施,提供了不同饲养系统中患病率的详细分析,随后对各饲养系统进行了比较。研究了与系统相关的常见和特定风险以及与管理相关的风险及相应预防措施。评估3包括对可用于对农场福利水平进行分类的农场特征(如产奶量、牛群规模)的分析。从现有的科学文献中,无法得出可用农场数据与奶牛福利之间的相关关联。因此,开发了一种基于专家知识提取(EKE)的方法。EKE确定了五项农场特征(最大饲养密度下每个隔栏有多头牛、奶牛空间有限、隔栏尺寸不合适、农场死亡率高以及牧场放牧时间不足2个月的农场)。如果存在这些农场特征中的一项或多项,建议使用针对特定福利后果的基于动物的措施,对相关农场的奶牛福利进行评估。