Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4 Canada.
School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 217, Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6AH, United Kingdom.
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Jul;102(7):5784-5810. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15603. Epub 2019 May 10.
Concern from the public is growing regarding early cow-calf separation, yet proponents of this practice maintain that artificial rearing is critical for cow and calf health. Early separation is assumed to reduce the risk of transfer of pathogens from dam to neonatal calf, but a wide range of health benefits associated with extended cow-calf contact has also been documented. The aim of this systematic review was to report and synthesize conclusions from the literature on dairy cow and calf health in conventional rearing versus cow-calf contact systems. Peer-reviewed, published manuscripts, written in English, directly comparing dairy cow or calf health in artificial versus suckling systems, were eligible for inclusion. We conducted 7 targeted searches using Web of Science to identify key literature on important health conditions. The resulting manuscripts underwent a 4-step appraisal process, and further manuscripts were sourced from reference lists. This process resulted in a final sample of 70 articles that addressed cow and calf health. Sufficient literature was available to assess mastitis in cows, and scours, cryptosporidiosis, Johne's disease, pneumonia, immunity, and mortality in calves. The results for cryptosporidiosis, pneumonia, immunity, and mortality were mixed, with some differences between studies likely attributable to flawed comparisons between cohorts. Overall, the articles addressing calf scours and mastitis pointed to beneficial or no effects of suckling. The studies addressing Johne's disease did not find cow-calf contact to be a significant risk factor. In conclusion, the scientific peer-reviewed literature on cow and calf health provides no consistent evidence in support of early separation.
公众对早期母子分离的担忧日益加剧,但这种做法的支持者认为人工饲养对牛和牛犊的健康至关重要。早期分离被认为可以降低病原体从母牛传播给新生牛犊的风险,但也有大量与延长母牛-小牛接触相关的健康益处已被记录。本系统评价的目的是报告和综合有关传统饲养与母子接触系统中奶牛和小牛健康的文献结论。符合条件的是直接比较人工和哺乳系统中奶牛或小牛健康的同行评审、已发表的英文文献。我们使用 Web of Science 进行了 7 项有针对性的搜索,以确定重要健康状况的关键文献。生成的手稿经过 4 步评估程序,进一步的手稿来自参考文献列表。这一过程产生了 70 篇最终涉及奶牛和小牛健康的文章。有足够的文献可用于评估奶牛乳腺炎和犊牛腹泻、隐孢子虫病、约翰氏病、肺炎、免疫力和死亡率。隐孢子虫病、肺炎、免疫力和死亡率的结果喜忧参半,一些研究之间的差异可能归因于队列之间的比较存在缺陷。总体而言,涉及犊牛腹泻和乳腺炎的文章指出哺乳有有益或无影响。涉及约翰氏病的研究并未发现母子接触是一个重要的危险因素。总之,关于奶牛和小牛健康的科学同行评议文献没有提供一致的证据支持早期分离。