Rushing Calvin J, Rushing Denae C, Spinner Steven M, Hardigan Patrick
Resident, Westside Regional Medical Center, Plantation, FL; Board Member, Foot and Ankle Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc., Plantation, FL.
Doctor of Medical Dentistry Candidate, Nova Southeastern College of Dental Medicine, Plantation, FL.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Jul;58(4):692-695. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.11.027. Epub 2019 May 10.
The oral abstract publication incidence (76.9%) of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS) is currently the highest reported for any national foot and ankle society conference to date. However, factors associated with the conversion of an abstract to a journal publication (JP) remain undetermined. The purpose of the present study was to identify the factors associated with the JP and time to publication for oral abstracts from the ACFAS conference from 2010 to 2014. Databases containing information on the abstracts were procured, and predictor variables were categorized as abstract or author specific. Bivariate analysis was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher's exact test, chi-square test of independence, or Spearman's rank correlation. Multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear regression models were utilized to analyze predictor variables. Oral abstracts by authors without a formal research degree were >12 times (95% confidence interval 2.25 to 71.67) more likely to achieve JP compared to abstracts by authors with a research degree. The author-specific variable was the only significant predictor of future JP (p = .002); however, trends with respect to other variables (funding, prior publications, and ACFAS regional division) were also identified. Abstracts originating from academic institutions (p = .042) and those involving fewer centers (p = .03) were associated with a significantly shorter time to publication. Although the present study broadens our understanding on the publication incidence and time to publication for oral abstracts from the ACFAS from 2010 to 2014, it remains unclear why almost a quarter of the abstracts accepted ultimately failed to achieve JP. Identifying the publication barriers of those abstracts remains a necessary first step in helping to form recommendations aimed at improving the future publication incidence for oral abstracts presented at the ACFAS conference.
美国足踝外科医师学会(ACFAS)的口头摘要发表率(76.9%)是目前有报道以来所有全国性足踝协会会议中最高的。然而,摘要转化为期刊发表(JP)的相关因素仍未明确。本研究的目的是确定2010年至2014年ACFAS会议口头摘要转化为JP以及发表时间的相关因素。获取了包含摘要信息的数据库,并将预测变量分为摘要特定或作者特定两类。使用曼-惠特尼U检验、费舍尔精确检验、独立性卡方检验或斯皮尔曼等级相关性进行双变量分析。利用多变量逻辑回归和广义线性回归模型分析预测变量。与有研究学位的作者的摘要相比,没有正式研究学位的作者的口头摘要实现JP的可能性高出12倍以上(95%置信区间2.25至71.67)。作者特定变量是未来JP的唯一显著预测因素(p = 0.002);然而,也确定了其他变量(资金、既往发表情况和ACFAS地区分部)的趋势。来自学术机构的摘要(p = 0.042)和涉及中心较少的摘要(p = 0.03)与显著更短的发表时间相关。尽管本研究拓宽了我们对2010年至2014年ACFAS会议口头摘要发表率和发表时间的理解,但仍不清楚为什么最终接受的摘要中有近四分之一未能实现JP。确定这些摘要的发表障碍仍然是帮助形成旨在提高ACFAS会议上展示的口头摘要未来发表率的建议的必要第一步。