• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中枢神经系统肿瘤和其他类型儿童期癌症成年长期幸存者的计划能力的现状和预测因素。

Status and predictors of planning ability in adult long-term survivors of CNS tumors and other types of childhood cancer.

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 May 13;9(1):7290. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43874-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-43874-4
PMID:31086281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6514211/
Abstract

Long-term childhood cancer survivors' (CCS) quality of life can be impacted by late effects such as cognitive difficulties. Especially survivors of CNS tumors are assumed to be at risk, but reports of cognitive tests in CCS with survival times >25 years are scarce. We assessed planning ability, a capacity closely related to fluid intelligence, using the Tower of London. We compared 122 CNS tumor survivors, 829 survivors of other cancers (drawn from a register-based sample of adult long-term CCS), and 215 healthy controls (using sex-specific one-way ANOVAs and t-tests). Associations of CCS' planning ability with medical and psychosocial factors were investigated with a hierarchical linear regression analysis. Mean planning ability did not differ between CCS and controls. However, female CNS tumor survivors performed worse than female survivors of other cancers and female controls. CNS tumor survivors of both sexes had a lower socioeconomic status, and fewer of them had achieved high education than other survivors. In the regression analysis, lower status and anxiety symptoms were associated with poor planning, suggesting possible mediators of effects of disease and treatment. The results indicate the necessity to contextualize test results, and to include cognitive and psychological assessments into aftercare.

摘要

长期儿童癌症幸存者(CCS)的生活质量可能会受到认知困难等晚期效应的影响。特别是中枢神经系统肿瘤幸存者被认为存在风险,但对于生存时间超过 25 年的 CCS 患者的认知测试报告却很少。我们使用伦敦塔评估了计划能力,这是一种与流体智力密切相关的能力。我们比较了 122 名中枢神经系统肿瘤幸存者、829 名其他癌症幸存者(从基于登记的成年长期 CCS 幸存者样本中抽取)和 215 名健康对照组(使用性别特异性单向方差分析和 t 检验)。使用分层线性回归分析调查了 CCS 计划能力与医疗和心理社会因素的关联。CCS 和对照组的计划能力平均值没有差异。然而,女性中枢神经系统肿瘤幸存者的表现不如女性其他癌症幸存者和女性对照组。两性的中枢神经系统肿瘤幸存者社会经济地位较低,接受高等教育的比例也低于其他幸存者。在回归分析中,较低的社会地位和焦虑症状与较差的计划能力相关,这表明疾病和治疗的影响可能存在中介因素。结果表明有必要对测试结果进行背景化,并将认知和心理评估纳入后续护理中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20ab/6514211/ecc72de12fac/41598_2019_43874_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20ab/6514211/ecc72de12fac/41598_2019_43874_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20ab/6514211/ecc72de12fac/41598_2019_43874_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Status and predictors of planning ability in adult long-term survivors of CNS tumors and other types of childhood cancer.中枢神经系统肿瘤和其他类型儿童期癌症成年长期幸存者的计划能力的现状和预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 13;9(1):7290. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43874-4.
2
Psychosocial outcomes in long-term Dutch adult survivors of childhood cancer: The DCCSS-LATER 2 psycho-oncology study.荷兰儿童癌症长期幸存者的心理社会结局:DCCSS-LATER 2 心理肿瘤学研究。
Cancer. 2023 Aug 15;129(16):2553-2567. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34795. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
3
Social adjustment in adolescent survivors of pediatric central nervous system tumors: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.青少年中枢神经系统肿瘤幸存者的社会适应:来自儿童癌症幸存者研究的报告。
Cancer. 2018 Sep 1;124(17):3596-3608. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31593. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
4
Health-related quality of life in Dutch adult survivors of childhood cancer: A nation-wide cohort study.荷兰成年儿童癌症幸存者的健康相关生活质量:一项全国性队列研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jul;152:204-214. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.04.033. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
5
A study of childhood cancer survivors' engagement with long-term follow-up care: 'To attend or not to attend, that is the question'.一项关于儿童癌症幸存者参与长期随访护理的研究:“去还是不去,这是个问题”。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Apr;45:101728. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101728. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
6
"I don't take for granted that I am doing well today": a mixed methods study on well-being, impact of cancer, and supportive needs in long-term childhood cancer survivors.“我不会想当然地认为我今天过得很好”:一项关于幸福感、癌症影响和长期儿童癌症幸存者支持需求的混合方法研究。
Qual Life Res. 2022 May;31(5):1483-1497. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03042-6. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
7
Impact of vision loss among survivors of childhood central nervous system astroglial tumors.儿童中枢神经系统星形胶质细胞瘤幸存者视力丧失的影响。
Cancer. 2016 Mar 1;122(5):730-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29705. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
8
Positive and negative survivor-specific psychosocial consequences of childhood cancer: the DCCSS-LATER 2 psycho-oncology study.儿童癌症患者的生存者特有的积极和消极心理社会后果:DCCSS-LATER 2 心理肿瘤学研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Oct;18(5):1505-1516. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01394-1. Epub 2023 May 11.
9
Health and persistent functional late effects in adult survivors of childhood CNS tumours: a population-based cohort study.儿童中枢神经系统肿瘤成年幸存者的健康状况及持续性功能迟发效应:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Sep;45(14):2552-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
10
What's past is prologue: Recalled parenting styles are associated with childhood cancer survivors' mental health outcomes more than 25 years after diagnosis.往事为序:在诊断后 25 年以上,被召回的养育方式与儿童癌症幸存者的心理健康结果有关。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 May;252:112916. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112916. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of mental distress among adult survivors of childhood cancer in Germany-Compared to the general population.德国儿童癌症成年幸存者中心理困扰的流行率——与普通人群相比。
Cancer Med. 2019 Apr;8(4):1865-1874. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1936. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
2
Assessing Planning Ability Across the Adult Life Span in a Large Population-Representative Sample: Reliability Estimates and Normative Data for the Tower of London (TOL-F) Task.在一个大的人口代表性样本中评估整个成年期的规划能力:伦敦塔(TOL-F)任务的可靠性估计和常模数据。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 May;25(5):520-529. doi: 10.1017/S1355617718001248. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
3
Social adjustment in adolescent survivors of pediatric central nervous system tumors: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.
青少年中枢神经系统肿瘤幸存者的社会适应:来自儿童癌症幸存者研究的报告。
Cancer. 2018 Sep 1;124(17):3596-3608. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31593. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
4
Long-term survivors of childhood cancer: cure and care-the Erice Statement (2006) revised after 10 years (2016).儿童癌症长期幸存者:治愈与关怀——埃里切宣言(2006 年)修订版(2016 年)。
J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Oct;12(5):647-650. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0701-0. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
5
Neurocognitive Outcomes and Interventions in Long-Term Survivors of Childhood Cancer.儿童癌症长期幸存者的神经认知结果和干预措施。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 20;36(21):2181-2189. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.4696. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
6
Psychological Symptoms, Social Outcomes, Socioeconomic Attainment, and Health Behaviors Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Current State of the Literature.儿童癌症幸存者的心理症状、社会结局、社会经济成就和健康行为:文献现状。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 20;36(21):2190-2197. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.5552. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
7
Burden of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular disease in childhood cancer survivors: data from the German CVSS-study.心血管危险因素和儿童癌症幸存者心血管疾病的负担:来自德国 CVSS 研究的数据。
Eur Heart J. 2018 May 1;39(17):1555-1562. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy026.
8
Subclinical levels of anxiety but not depression are associated with planning performance in a large population-based sample.亚临床焦虑水平与大人群样本中的规划表现相关,但与抑郁无关。
Psychol Med. 2018 Jan;48(1):168-174. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717002562. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
9
Brain structure, working memory and response inhibition in childhood leukemia survivors.儿童白血病幸存者的大脑结构、工作记忆和反应抑制。
Brain Behav. 2016 Dec 29;7(2):e00621. doi: 10.1002/brb3.621. eCollection 2017 Feb.
10
Role of working memory, inhibition, and fluid intelligence in the performance of the Tower of London task.工作记忆、抑制能力和流体智力在伦敦塔任务表现中的作用。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2017 Nov-Dec;24(6):548-558. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2016.1225071. Epub 2016 Sep 20.