• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

麦克格拉斯可视喉镜与麦金托什直接喉镜在产科患者中的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Comparison of the McGrath video laryngoscope and macintosh direct laryngoscope in obstetric patients: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Toker Melike Korkmaz, Altıparmak Basak, Karabay Ayse Gul

机构信息

Melike Korkmaz Toker, Mugla Sitki Kocman University Research and Training Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Mugla, Turkey.

Basak Altiparmak, Mugla Sıtkı Kocman University, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Mugla, Turkey.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2019 Mar-Apr;35(2):342-347. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.2.646.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.35.2.646
PMID:31086512
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6500838/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In obstetric patients' airway, guidelines have recommended the availability of advanced airway equipment. Our aim was to compare the larynx visualization provided by the Macintosh direct laryngoscope and McGrath video laryngoscope and the intubation time of patients undergoing cesarean section.

METHODS

This study was conducted at a private obstetrics and gynecology hospital during one month between June and July 2018. A hundred patients scheduled for elective cesarean section under general anesthesia were randomized into two different group's as intubated using either McGrath VL or Macintosh DL. The intubation times, Cormack-Lehane grade, percentage of glottic opening, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rates before and after intubation were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

The McGrath VL significantly reduced the intubation time compared to the Macintosh DL. In the McGrath VL group, better glottic view set the time of tracheal intubation as assessed using the Cormack-Lehane classification system and POGO scores were recorded. After intubation, hemodynamic parameters were significantly higher in the Macintosh DL group than in the McGrath VL group.

CONCLUSION

The McGrath VL significantly lowered intubation time relative to the Macintosh DL, which may be a critical finding considering the importance of maintaining the mother's airway for the health of both mother and baby.

摘要

目的

在产科患者气道方面,指南推荐应配备高级气道设备。我们的目的是比较麦金托什直接喉镜和麦格拉斯视频喉镜提供的喉部可视化效果以及剖宫产患者的插管时间。

方法

本研究于2018年6月至7月期间在一家私立妇产科医院进行。100例计划在全身麻醉下进行择期剖宫产的患者被随机分为两组,分别使用麦格拉斯视频喉镜(VL)或麦金托什直接喉镜(DL)进行插管。比较两组患者的插管时间、科马克-莱汉内分级、声门开口百分比、插管前后的平均动脉血压和心率。

结果

与麦金托什直接喉镜相比,麦格拉斯视频喉镜显著缩短了插管时间。在麦格拉斯视频喉镜组中,根据科马克-莱汉内分类系统评估,获得了更好的声门视野并记录了气管插管时间和POGO评分。插管后,麦金托什直接喉镜组的血流动力学参数显著高于麦格拉斯视频喉镜组。

结论

相对于麦金托什直接喉镜,麦格拉斯视频喉镜显著降低了插管时间,考虑到维护母亲气道对母婴健康的重要性,这可能是一个关键发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c1/6500838/0da56aa6b1de/PJMS-35-342-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c1/6500838/0da56aa6b1de/PJMS-35-342-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c1/6500838/0da56aa6b1de/PJMS-35-342-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the McGrath video laryngoscope and macintosh direct laryngoscope in obstetric patients: A randomized controlled trial.麦克格拉斯可视喉镜与麦金托什直接喉镜在产科患者中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Pak J Med Sci. 2019 Mar-Apr;35(2):342-347. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.2.646.
2
Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: a randomized controlled trial.三种视频喉镜与直接喉镜用于肥胖患者插管的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Jun;31:71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.12.042. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
3
The McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomized trial in obstetric patients.麦克格拉斯系列 5 视频喉镜与 Macintosh 喉镜:产科患者的随机试验。
Turk J Med Sci. 2014;44(3):387-92. doi: 10.3906/sag-1306-71.
4
Comparison of McGrath(®) Series 5 video laryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope: A prospective, randomised trial in patients with normal airways.麦格拉斯(®)5系列视频喉镜与麦金托什喉镜的比较:一项针对气道正常患者的前瞻性随机试验。
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Jul-Aug;32(4):869-74. doi: 10.12669/pjms.324.10037.
5
Comparative Evaluation of McGrath MAC, Truview Video Laryngoscopes and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Surgery under General Anaesthesia.麦克格拉斯MAC喉镜、Truview可视喉镜与麦金托什喉镜用于全身麻醉手术患者气管插管的比较评估
Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jan-Mar;14(1):20-24. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_16_20. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
6
Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Miller Laryngoscope and the McGrath-MAC Video Laryngoscope in Direct Visualization of the Glottic Opening.Miller 喉镜与 McGrath-MAC 视频喉镜在直接观察声门开口时的效果比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 28;60(1):62. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010062.
7
The usefulness of the McGrath MAC laryngoscope in comparison with Airwayscope and Macintosh laryngoscope during routine nasotracheal intubation: a randomaized controlled trial.麦格拉斯MAC喉镜在常规经鼻气管插管过程中与气道镜及麦金托什喉镜相比的有效性:一项随机对照试验
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Dec 1;17(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0451-y.
8
Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial.新手在正常人和颈椎固定模型中比较麦克格雷斯、宾得和麦克intosh 喉镜:一项随机交叉试验。
Eur J Med Res. 2020 Aug 20;25(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40001-020-00435-0.
9
A randomized controlled comparison of non-channeled king vision, McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with predicted difficult intubations.非通道型King视可尼喉镜、麦格拉斯MAC视频喉镜与麦金托什直接喉镜用于预计插管困难患者鼻气管插管的随机对照比较
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Aug 31;19(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0838-z.
10
McGrath Video Laryngoscopy Facilitates Routine Nasotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Comparison With Macintosh Laryngoscopy.麦格拉斯可视喉镜有助于口腔颌面外科手术患者的常规鼻气管插管:与麦金托什喉镜的比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Feb;74(2):256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.07.021. Epub 2015 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review.麦克格拉斯视频喉镜与麦金托什喉镜在气管插管中的比较:一项更新的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 24;12(19):6168. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196168.
2
COVID-19 critical illness in pregnancy.妊娠期新冠重症
Obstet Med. 2022 Dec;15(4):220-224. doi: 10.1177/1753495X211051246. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
3
Critical Care Management of Severe COVID-19 in Pregnant Patients.孕妇重症 COVID-19 的重症监护管理

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: a randomized controlled trial.三种视频喉镜与直接喉镜用于肥胖患者插管的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Jun;31:71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.12.042. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
2
Effect of the McGRATH MAC® Video Laryngoscope on Hemodynamic Response during Tracheal Intubation: A Retrospective Study.麦格拉思MAC®可视喉镜对气管插管期间血流动力学反应的影响:一项回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2016 May 12;11(5):e0155566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155566. eCollection 2016.
3
Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology.
Cureus. 2022 May 10;14(5):e24885. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24885. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.视频喉镜与直接喉镜用于成人气管插管。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3.
5
Comparisons of Videolaryngoscopes for Intubation Undergoing General Anesthesia: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.全身麻醉下视频喉镜插管的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 26;12(3):363. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030363.
6
A comparative study of haemodynamic effects of single-blinded orotracheal intubations with intubating laryngeal mask airway, Macintosh and McGrath video laryngoscopes.经口盲探气管插管与 Macintosh、McGrath 视频喉镜和插管型喉罩在血流动力学影响方面的比较研究。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(1):30-36. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.103663.
产科麻醉实践指南:美国麻醉医师协会产科麻醉特别工作组及产科麻醉与围产医学学会的最新报告。
Anesthesiology. 2016 Feb;124(2):270-300. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000935.
4
Video laryngoscopes and the obstetric airway.视频喉镜与产科气道
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015 May;24(2):137-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
5
The McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomized trial in obstetric patients.麦克格拉斯系列 5 视频喉镜与 Macintosh 喉镜:产科患者的随机试验。
Turk J Med Sci. 2014;44(3):387-92. doi: 10.3906/sag-1306-71.
6
The McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway.《麦克格拉斯® 5 型视频喉镜与 Macintosh 喉镜的比较:一项模拟困难气道患者的随机对照试验》
Anaesthesia. 2013 Feb;68(2):142-7. doi: 10.1111/anae.12075. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
7
Comparison of different video laryngoscopes for emergency intubation in a standardized airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by experienced anaesthetists. A randomized, controlled crossover trial.比较不同的视频喉镜在由经验丰富的麻醉师对固定颈椎的标准化气道模型进行紧急插管的效果。一项随机、对照交叉试验。
Resuscitation. 2012 Jun;83(6):740-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.11.024. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
8
The obstetric airway: things are seldom as they seem.产科气道:情况往往并非表面看上去的那样。
Can J Anaesth. 2011 Jun;58(6):494-8. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9492-8.
9
Evaluation of the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope after failed direct laryngoscopy.评估在直接喉镜检查失败后的 McGrath Series 5 视频喉镜。
Anaesthesia. 2010 Jul;65(7):716-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06388.x. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
10
Mallampati class changes during pregnancy, labour, and after delivery: can these be predicted?Mallampati 分级在孕期、分娩期和产后的变化:这些可以预测吗?
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Jan;104(1):67-70. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep356.