School of Medicine, University of Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Neurocrit Care. 2019 Oct;31(2):365-372. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00731-6.
Bibliometric analyses may indicate the most active journals, authors, countries, institutions and specialties by evaluating the most cited articles in a given research field. To the authors' knowledge, there is no bibliometric analysis regarding neurocritical care research. Thus, the aim of this study is to analyze and to provide a scope of the current scientific production in this area. The 100 most cited articles in the neurocritical care research were retrieved from the research "(neurocritical) AND (care)" in the Scopus database. The variables collected and included in this analysis were: number of citations, article title, first author's name, year and journal of publication and its impact factor (IF), specialty, affiliation and country of the corresponding author at the time of publication, and category of the article. Also, these variables were assessed for primary research only. The articles were published in 34 different journals from 1995 to 2017, with a mean citation number of 109.36, ranging from 44 to 540. Neurocritical Care (23 articles in top 100 and 2190 citations, IF = 3.163) and Critical Care Medicine (20 articles and 2896 citations in top 100, IF = 6.630) were the journals with the greatest number of articles and citations, respectively. Neurocritical Care also had the highest number of primary research papers (15 articles, accounting for 850 citations). Excepting one article from Asia (Singapore) and one from Oceania (Australia), all the other 98 papers were from North America (67) or Europe (31). United States was the country with most articles (60, 35 primary research) and citations (6115) among the top 100. Columbia University (11 articles, being 7 primary research, and 915 citations) was the institution with the highest number of articles and primary research articles in top 100, whereas University of Heidelberg (6 articles and 1220 citations) was the most cited institution. Neurology was the specialty with the greatest number of publications in top 100 and the most cited one (57 articles and 5983 citations). The first author with the greatest number of publications as well as primary research articles was A. I. Qureshi (5 articles, being 4 primary research, and 660 citations), while the most cited was K. H. Polderman (2 articles and 749 citations). Fifty-nine publications were primary and 41 secondary research. Among primary research, treatment/management was the most frequent and most cited topics (33 articles and 4172 citations). To the authors' knowledge, this is the first bibliometric analysis regarding neurocritical care research. Our findings suggest that the neurocritical care research field is more prominent in North America and Europe, more frequently published in specific critical care journals and after 1994. The most discussed topic was related to treatment and/or management within neurocritical care.
文献计量学分析可以通过评估给定研究领域中被引用最多的文章,来确定最活跃的期刊、作者、国家、机构和专业。据作者所知,目前尚无关于神经危重症护理研究的文献计量学分析。因此,本研究的目的是分析和提供该领域当前科学研究的范围。从 Scopus 数据库中检索到神经危重症护理研究中被引用最多的 100 篇文章,检索词为"(neurocritical) AND (care)"。本分析中纳入的变量包括:引用次数、文章标题、第一作者姓名、发表年份和期刊及其影响因子(IF)、专业、通讯作者发表时的所属机构和国家,以及文章类别。此外,这些变量仅针对原始研究进行评估。这些文章发表于 1995 年至 2017 年间的 34 种不同期刊上,平均引用次数为 109.36,范围从 44 到 540。神经危重症护理(在 100 篇文章中排名前 23 位,引用次数为 2190 次,IF=3.163)和危重病医学(在 100 篇文章中排名前 20 位,引用次数为 2896 次,IF=6.630)是被引用次数最多的期刊。神经危重症护理也有最多的原始研究论文(15 篇,占 850 次引用)。除了一篇来自亚洲(新加坡)和一篇来自大洋洲(澳大利亚)的文章外,其他 98 篇文章均来自北美(67 篇)或欧洲(31 篇)。美国是在 100 篇文章中发表文章(60 篇,35 篇原始研究)和引用次数(6115)最多的国家。哥伦比亚大学(11 篇文章,其中 7 篇为原始研究,915 次引用)在 100 篇文章中拥有最多的文章和原始研究文章,而海德堡大学(6 篇文章和 1220 次引用)的被引次数最多。神经病学是在 100 篇文章中发表文章最多和被引次数最多的专业(57 篇文章和 5983 次引用)。发表文章和原始研究文章最多的第一作者是 A. I. Qureshi(5 篇文章,其中 4 篇为原始研究,660 次引用),而被引次数最多的是 K. H. Polderman(2 篇文章和 749 次引用)。有 59 篇是原始研究,41 篇是二级研究。在原始研究中,治疗/管理是最常见和被引用最多的主题(33 篇文章和 4172 次引用)。据作者所知,这是第一篇关于神经危重症护理研究的文献计量学分析。我们的研究结果表明,神经危重症护理研究领域在北美和欧洲更为突出,更多地发表在特定的危重病护理期刊上,并且始于 1994 年之后。讨论最多的主题与神经危重症护理中的治疗和/或管理有关。