Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Jan;76(1):150-160. doi: 10.1002/ps.5485. Epub 2019 May 30.
We previously identified a glyphosate-resistant A. trifida phenotype from Wisconsin USA that showed a non-rapid response to glyphosate. The mechanism of glyphosate resistance in this phenotype has yet to be elucidated. We conducted experiments to investigate non-target-site resistance and target-site resistance mechanisms. The roles of glyphosate absorption, translocation, and metabolism in resistance of this phenotype have not been reported previously, nor have EPSPS protein abundance or mutations to the full-length sequence of EPSPS.
Whole-plant dose-response results confirmed a 6.5-level of glyphosate resistance for the resistant (R) phenotype compared to a susceptible (S) phenotype. Absorption and translocation of C-glyphosate were similar between R and S phenotypes over 72 h. Glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in leaf tissue did not differ between R and S phenotypes over 96 h. In vivo shikimate leaf disc assays confirmed that glyphosate EC values were 4.6- to 5.4-fold greater for the R than S phenotype. Shikimate accumulation was similar between phenotypes at high glyphosate concentrations (>1000 μM), suggesting that glyphosate entered chloroplasts and inhibited EPSPS. This finding was supported by results showing that EPSPS copy number and EPSPS protein abundance did not differ between R and S phenotypes, nor did EPSPS sequence at Gly101, Thr102, and Pro106 positions. Comparison of full-length EPSPS sequences found five nonsynonymous polymorphisms that differed between R and S phenotypes. However, their locations were distant from the glyphosate target site and, therefore, not likely to affect enzyme-glyphosate interaction.
The results suggest that a novel mechanism confers glyphosate resistance in this A. trifida phenotype. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
我们之前从美国威斯康星州鉴定出一个抗草甘膦的三裂叶豚草表型,其对草甘膦表现出非快速反应。这种表型的草甘膦抗性机制尚未阐明。我们进行了实验来研究非靶标部位抗性和靶标部位抗性机制。该表型的草甘膦抗性的吸收、转运和代谢作用以前没有报道过,也没有报道过 EPSPS 蛋白丰度或全长序列的 EPSPS 突变。
全株剂量反应结果证实,与敏感(S)表型相比,抗性(R)表型的草甘膦抗性水平为 6.5 级。在 72 小时内,R 和 S 表型之间 C-草甘膦的吸收和转运相似。在 96 小时内,R 和 S 表型之间叶组织中的草甘膦和 AMPA 浓度没有差异。体内莽草酸叶片圆盘测定证实,R 表型的草甘膦 EC 值比 S 表型高 4.6 到 5.4 倍。在高草甘膦浓度(>1000 μM)下,两种表型的莽草酸积累相似,表明草甘膦进入叶绿体并抑制 EPSPS。这一发现得到了 EPSPS 拷贝数和 EPSPS 蛋白丰度在 R 和 S 表型之间没有差异的结果的支持,也得到了 Gly101、Thr102 和 Pro106 位置的 EPSPS 序列没有差异的结果的支持。比较全长 EPSPS 序列发现,R 和 S 表型之间有五个非同义多态性,但其位置远离草甘膦靶标部位,因此不太可能影响酶-草甘膦相互作用。
结果表明,一种新的机制赋予了这种三裂叶豚草表型对草甘膦的抗性。© 2019 化学工业协会。