Newman Lauren
Georgia State University College of Law.
J Law Health. 2019;32(1):1-26.
The following Article discusses the extent to which the constitutional right to informational privacy protects medical data from improper acquisition or dissemination by state agents. Part I provides background on , the Supreme Court case that has been understood to establish the right to informational privacy. Part I also discusses the variations across the circuit courts as to what medical information is afforded protection by the right. Part II analyzes the well-established approaches adopted by the Second and Third Circuits as they present opposing interpretations of , one wholly protecting medical information and the other protecting scarcely any. Finally, Part III explains why the Supreme Court and courts that have yet to adopt a uniform approach should follow the Third Circuit and constitutionally protect all medical information from improper government acquisition or dissemination. Part III also argues for an amendment to the Privacy Act to provide individuals whose medical conditions are not afforded protection under the Constitution an alternative remedy.
以下文章探讨了信息隐私权这一宪法权利在多大程度上保护医疗数据不被国家机构不当获取或传播。第一部分提供了关于最高法院案件的背景信息,该案件被认为确立了信息隐私权。第一部分还讨论了各巡回法院在何种医疗信息受该权利保护方面存在的差异。第二部分分析了第二和第三巡回法院所采用的既定方法,因为它们对[具体案件名称]呈现出相反的解释,一个完全保护医疗信息,另一个几乎不保护任何医疗信息。最后,第三部分解释了为什么最高法院以及尚未采用统一方法的法院应遵循第三巡回法院的做法,从宪法层面保护所有医疗信息不被政府不当获取或传播。第三部分还主张对《隐私法》进行修订,以便为那些其医疗状况在宪法下得不到保护的个人提供替代补救措施。