Hajihassani Abolfazl, Ye Weimin, Hampton Brooke B
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia , Tifton, GA, 31794.
Nematode Assay Section, Agronomic Division, North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, Raleigh , NC, 27607.
J Nematol. 2019;51:1-3. doi: 10.21307/jofnem-2019-006.
Ginger ( L.) and turmeric ( L.) are two her baceous perennial plant species with rhizomes that are commonly used for flavoring or medicinal purposes. In January 2018, stunting and poorly developed root systems typically associated with plant-parasitic nematode infection were observed on organically grown edible ginger and turmeric in a hoop house in Wheeler County, Georgia. Examination of soil and root samples from symptomatic plants revealed the presence of high populations of root-knot nematodes ( spp.). The second-stage juveniles (J2s) were extracted from soil samples as described by Jenkins (1964). Nematode counts were 285 and 155 J2s per 100 cm soil in the areas planted with ginger and turmeric, respectively. Nematode eggs were recovered from infected root systems using the bleach (1%) and blending method (Hussey and Barker, 1973). Examination of the root samples showed the presence of 840 and 320 eggs per g of roots in ginger and turmeric, respectively. Primary diagnosis of the specimens was done by comparing morphological features observed in the J2s (n = 10) and perineal pattern of females (n = 11) based on the description given by Eisenback and Triantaphyllou (1991) and were tentatively identified as (Treub, 1885; Chitwood, 1949). For species identification, DNA sequencing was performed using multiple markers located in 18S ribosomal RNA and 5.8S internal transcribed spacer 1 regions, (18S + ITS) (GenBank Accession No. MK390613), 28S domain 2 and 3 (28S D2/D3) (MK385596), cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (MK391558), and subunit II and 16S (COII + 16S) (MK391557) of mitochondrial DNA following methods as described in Ye et al. (2015). PCR assays by species-specific primers were also conducted to confirm species identity as described by Zijlstra et al. (2000). The blast search results of DNA sequences of 18S + ITS, 28S (D2/D3), COI and COII + 16S revealed the best match as , (Kofoid and White, 1912; Chitwood, 1949) and (Neal, 1889; Chitwood, 1949) with 99-100% identity. These genes are highly conserved across these three most common root-knot nematode species. However, results of PCR assays by species-specific primers were only positive for using primers Fjav/Rjav, but negative for by Finc/Rinc and by Far/Rar as described by Zijlstra et al. (2000). Based on morphological characteristics and molecular analyses, the root-knot nematodes infecting ginger and turmeric were identified as . After confirmation of the nematode species, a test was conducted in the greenhouse to assess the pathogenicity of the nematode on ginger and turmeric. Five seedlings per plant species (cultivars unknown) were grown in 15 cm-diam plastic pots containing equal parts of pasteurized field soil and sand, and then inoculated with 2,000 eggs of . The egg suspension was added into three holes around the base of each seedling. Non-inoculated seedlings (n2 = 25) were used as controls. Plants were arranged in completely randomized design and grown at 25 ± 3 °C for 10 weeks. At the termination of the experiment, small galls were noticed on the roots of the inoculated seedlings of both ginger and turmeric. No galls were observed on the roots of non-inoculated plants. Egg were extracted from the galled roots (Hussey and Barker, 1973) yielding an average of 1040 ± 96 and 732 ± 54 eggs per g of root of ginger and turmeric, respectively. On ginger, the nematode produced large numbers of galls and egg masses on both primary and secondary (feeder) roots, but the galls produced on turmeric were often observed only on primary roots (Fig. 1). No symptoms of root-knot nematode infestation including galls or water-soaked lesions were observed on the outer surface of rhizomes of both ginger and turmeric. However, the size of rhizomes in the -infested areas was visibly smaller than that in non-infested areas (Fig. 2). A similar reduction in the growth of turmeric rhizomes was also observed. has been commonly reported as a nematode pest of ginger (Myers et al., 2017) and turmeric (Hall et al., 2017) in the USA and both and are known to cause damage on these plant hosts (Ray et al., 1995; Singh and Gupta, 2011). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of on ginger and turmeric in the USA. Ginger ( L.) and turmeric ( L.) are two her baceous perennial plant species with rhizomes that are commonly used for flavoring or medicinal purposes. In January 2018, stunting and poorly developed root systems typically associated with plant-parasitic nematode infection were observed on organically grown edible ginger and turmeric in a hoop house in Wheeler County, Georgia. Examination of soil and root samples from symptomatic plants revealed the presence of high populations of root-knot nematodes ( spp.). The second-stage juveniles (J2s) were extracted from soil samples as described by Jenkins (1964). Nematode counts were 285 and 155 J2s per 100 cm soil in the areas planted with ginger and turmeric, respectively. Nematode eggs were recovered from infected root systems using the bleach (1%) and blending method (Hussey and Barker, 1973). Examination of the root samples showed the presence of 840 and 320 eggs per g of roots in ginger and turmeric, respectively. Primary diagnosis of the specimens was done by comparing morphological features observed in the J2s (n = 10) and perineal pattern of females (n = 11) based on the description given by Eisenback and Triantaphyllou (1991) and were tentatively identified as (Treub, 1885; Chitwood, 1949). For species identification, DNA sequencing was performed using multiple markers located in 18S ribosomal RNA and 5.8S internal transcribed spacer 1 regions, (18S + ITS) (GenBank Accession No. MK390613), 28S domain 2 and 3 (28S D2/D3) (MK385596), cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (MK391558), and subunit II and 16S (COII + 16S) (MK391557) of mitochondrial DNA following methods as described in Ye et al. (2015). PCR assays by species-specific primers were also conducted to confirm species identity as described by Zijlstra et al. (2000). The blast search results of DNA sequences of 18S + ITS, 28S (D2/D3), COI and COII + 16S revealed the best match as , (Kofoid and White, 1912; Chitwood, 1949) and (Neal, 1889; Chitwood, 1949) with 99–100% identity. These genes are highly conserved across these three most common root-knot nematode species. However, results of PCR assays by species-specific primers were only positive for using primers Fjav/Rjav, but negative for by Finc/Rinc and by Far/Rar as described by Zijlstra et al. (2000). Based on morphological characteristics and molecular analyses, the root-knot nematodes infecting ginger and turmeric were identified as . After confirmation of the nematode species, a test was conducted in the greenhouse to assess the pathogenicity of the nematode on ginger and turmeric. Five seedlings per plant species (cultivars unknown) were grown in 15 cm-diam plastic pots containing equal parts of pasteurized field soil and sand, and then inoculated with 2,000 eggs of . The egg suspension was added into three holes around the base of each seedling. Non-inoculated seedlings (n2 = 25) were used as controls. Plants were arranged in completely randomized design and grown at 25 ± 3 °C for 10 weeks. At the termination of the experiment, small galls were noticed on the roots of the inoculated seedlings of both ginger and turmeric. No galls were observed on the roots of non-inoculated plants. Egg were extracted from the galled roots (Hussey and Barker, 1973) yielding an average of 1040 ± 96 and 732 ± 54 eggs per g of root of ginger and turmeric, respectively. On ginger, the nematode produced large numbers of galls and egg masses on both primary and secondary (feeder) roots, but the galls produced on turmeric were often observed only on primary roots (Fig. 1). No symptoms of root-knot nematode infestation including galls or water-soaked lesions were observed on the outer surface of rhizomes of both ginger and turmeric. However, the size of rhizomes in the -infested areas was visibly smaller than that in non-infested areas (Fig. 2). A similar reduction in the growth of turmeric rhizomes was also observed. has been commonly reported as a nematode pest of ginger (Myers et al., 2017) and turmeric (Hall et al., 2017) in the USA and both and are known to cause damage on these plant hosts (Ray et al., 1995; Singh and Gupta, 2011). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of on ginger and turmeric in the USA.
姜(姜科)和姜黄(姜科)是两种多年生草本植物,其根茎常用于调味或药用。2018年1月,在佐治亚州惠勒县一个拱形棚内有机种植的可食用姜和姜黄上,观察到通常与植物寄生线虫感染相关的生长发育迟缓及根系发育不良的情况。对有症状植株的土壤和根系样本进行检查,发现存在大量根结线虫(南方根结线虫属)。按照詹金斯(1964年)所述方法,从土壤样本中提取了第二期幼虫(J2)。在种植姜和姜黄的区域,每100立方厘米土壤中的线虫数量分别为285条和155条J2。采用漂白剂(1%)和搅拌法(赫西和巴克,1973年)从受感染的根系中回收线虫卵。对根系样本的检查显示,姜和姜黄每克根中的卵数分别为840个和320个。根据艾森巴克和特里安塔菲洛(1991年)的描述,通过比较在J2(n = 10)中观察到的形态特征和雌虫会阴花纹(n = 11),对样本进行初步诊断,并初步鉴定为南方根结线虫(特鲁布,1885年;奇伍德,1949年)。为进行物种鉴定,按照叶等人(2015年)所述方法,使用位于18S核糖体RNA和5.8S内部转录间隔区1区域的多个标记进行DNA测序,即(18S + ITS)(GenBank登录号MK390613)、28S结构域2和3(28S D2/D3)(MK385596)、细胞色素氧化酶亚基I(COI)(MK391558)以及线粒体DNA的亚基II和16S(COII + 16S)(MK391557)。还按照齐尔斯特拉等人(2000年)所述方法,通过物种特异性引物进行PCR检测,以确认物种身份。18S + ITS、28S(D2/D3)、COI和COII + 16S的DNA序列比对搜索结果显示,与南方根结线虫(科福伊德和怀特,1912年;奇伍德,1949年)、花生根结线虫(尼尔,1889年;奇伍德,1949年)的匹配度最佳,相似度为99 - 100%。这些基因在这三种最常见的根结线虫物种中高度保守。然而,按照齐尔斯特拉等人(2000年)所述方法,通过物种特异性引物进行的PCR检测结果仅在使用引物Fjav/Rjav时对南方根结线虫呈阳性,而使用Finc/Rinc对爪哇根结线虫和使用Far/Rar对花生根结线虫呈阴性。基于形态特征和分子分析,鉴定出感染姜和姜黄的根结线虫为南方根结线虫。在确认线虫物种后,在温室中进行了一项试验,以评估该线虫对姜和姜黄的致病性。将每个植物物种(品种未知)中的五株幼苗种植在直径15厘米的塑料盆中,盆中装有等量的经巴氏消毒的田间土壤和沙子,然后接种2000个南方根结线虫卵。将卵悬液添加到每株幼苗基部周围的三个孔中。未接种的幼苗(n2 = 25)用作对照。植株采用完全随机设计,在25 ± 3°C下生长10周。在实验结束时,在接种的姜和姜黄幼苗的根部发现了小瘤。未接种植株的根部未观察到瘤。从有瘤的根部提取卵(赫西和巴克,1973年),姜和姜黄每克根平均分别产生1040 ± 96个和732 ± 54个卵。在姜上,线虫在主根和次生根(侧根)上都产生了大量瘤和卵块,但在姜黄上产生的瘤通常仅在主根上观察到(图1)。在姜和姜黄的根茎外表面均未观察到根结线虫侵染的症状,包括瘤或水渍状病变。然而,受南方根结线虫侵染区域的根茎尺寸明显小于未侵染区域(图2)。在姜黄根茎生长方面也观察到了类似的减少情况。在美国,南方根结线虫一直被普遍报道为姜(迈尔斯等人,2017年)和姜黄(霍尔等人,2017年)的线虫害虫,并且已知南方根结线虫和花生根结线虫都会对这些植物寄主造成损害(雷等人,1995年;辛格和古普塔,2011年)。据我们所知,这是美国关于南方根结线虫侵染姜和姜黄的首次报道。姜(姜科)和姜黄(姜科)是两种多年生草本植物,其根茎常用于调味或药用。2018年1月,在佐治亚州惠勒县一个拱形棚内有机种植的可食用姜和姜黄上,观察到通常与植物寄生线虫感染相关的生长发育迟缓及根系发育不良的情况。对有症状植株的土壤和根系样本进行检查,发现存在大量根结线虫(南方根结线虫属)。按照詹金斯(196年)所述方法,从土壤样本中提取了第二期幼虫(J2)。在种植姜和姜黄的区域,每100立方厘米土壤中的线虫数量分别为285条和155条J2。采用漂白剂(1%)和搅拌法(赫西和巴克,1973年)从受感染的根系中回收线虫卵。对根系样本的检查显示,姜和姜黄每克根中的卵数分别为840个和320个。根据艾森巴克和特里安塔菲洛(1991年)的描述,通过比较在J2(n = 10)中观察到的形态特征和雌虫会阴花纹(n = 11),对样本进行初步诊断,并初步鉴定为南方根结线虫(特鲁布,1885年;奇伍德,1949年)。为进行物种鉴定,按照叶等人(2015年)所述方法,使用位于18S核糖体RNA和5.8S内部转录间隔区1区域的多个标记进行DNA测序,即(18S + ITS)(GenBank登录号MK390613)、28S结构域2和3(28S D2/D3)(MK385596)、细胞色素氧化酶亚基I(COI)(MK391558)以及线粒体DNA的亚基II和16S(COII + 16S)(MK391557)。还按照齐尔斯特拉等人(2000年)所述方法,通过物种特异性引物进行PCR检测,以确认物种身份。18S + ITS、28S(D2/D3)、COI和COII + 16S的DNA序列比对搜索结果显示,与南方根结线虫(科福伊德和怀特,1912年;奇伍德,1949年)、花生根结线虫(尼尔,1889年;奇伍德,1949年)的匹配度最佳,相似度为99 - 100%。这些基因在这三种最常见的根结线虫物种中高度保守。然而,按照齐尔斯特拉等人(2000年)所述方法,通过物种特异性引物进行的PCR检测结果仅在使用引物Fjav/Rjav时对南方根结线虫呈阳性,而使用Finc/Rinc对爪哇根结线虫和使用Far/Rar对花生根结线虫呈阴性。基于形态特征和分子分析,鉴定出感染姜和姜黄的根结线虫为南方根结线虫。在确认线虫物种后,在温室中进行了一项试验,以评估该线虫对姜和姜黄的致病性。将每个植物物种(品种未知)中的五株幼苗种植在直径15厘米的塑料盆中,盆中装有等量的经巴氏消毒的田间土壤和沙子,然后接种2000个南方根结线虫卵。将卵悬液添加到每株幼苗基部周围的三个孔中。未接种的幼苗(n2 = 25)用作对照。植株采用完全随机设计,在25 ± 3°C下生长10周。在实验结束时,在接种的姜和姜黄幼苗的根部发现了小瘤。未接种植株的根部未观察到瘤。从有瘤的根部提取卵(赫西和巴克,1973年),姜和姜黄每克根平均分别产生1040 ± 96个和732 ± 54个卵。在姜上,线虫在主根和次生根(侧根)上都产生了大量瘤和卵块,但在姜黄上产生的瘤通常仅在主根上观察到(图1)。在姜和姜黄的根茎外表面均未观察到根结线虫侵染的症状,包括瘤或水渍状病变。然而,受南方根结线虫侵染区域的根茎尺寸明显小于未侵染区域(图2)。在姜黄根茎生长方面也观察到了类似的减少情况。在美国,南方根结线虫一直被普遍报道为姜(迈尔斯等人,2017年)和姜黄(霍尔等人,2017年)的线虫害虫,并且已知南方根结线虫和花生根结线虫都会对这些植物寄主造成损害(雷等人,1995年;辛格和古普塔,2011年)。据我们所知,这是美国关于南方根结线虫侵染姜和姜黄的首次报道。