Freixa Xavier, Cruz-González Ignacio, Regueiro Ander, Nombela-Franco Luís, Estévez-Loureiro Rodrigo, Ruiz-Salmerón Rafael, Bethencourt Armando, Gutiérrez-García Hipólito, Fernández-Díaz José Antonio, Moreno-Samos José Carlos, Jiménez-Quevedo Pilar, Martin-Yuste Victoria, Arnold Roman, Millan Xavier, Asmarats Luis, Ronquillo María, Agudelo-Montañez Víctor Hugo, López-Mínguez Jose Ramón, Goicolea Javier, Pérez de Prado Armando, Arzamendi Dabit
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, c/ Villarroel 170, Escala 3 Planta 6, 08015 Barcelona, Spain.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Aug;31(8):212-216. Epub 2019 May 15.
Stroke recurrence despite optimal oral anticoagulation (OAC) might represent a novel indication for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). The heterogeneity of these patients is generally high, as the presence of valvular atrial fibrillation (VAF) is common. The aim of this study was to explore the role of LAAO as an adjunctive therapy to OAC in patients with recurrent stroke despite optimal OAC.
The study screened consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous LAAO at nine centers between 2009 and 2017. Patients with recurrent stroke despite optimal OAC were selected and those with an absolute or relative contraindication to OAC were not included in the study.
Among 837 patients who underwent LAAO between the study period, a total of 22 (2.6%) met the inclusion criteria. There was a high percentage of VAF (38%) and 59% presented more than one cardioembolic event before LAAO. All patients underwent successful implantation of the device and no procedural major adverse events were reported. In all but 3 patients, anticoagulation was continued after LAAO. With a median clinical follow-up of 1.8 years (range, 0.7-2.8 years), only 1 stroke and 1 transient ischemic attack were reported, translating into a significant reduction of cerebrovascular events before and after LAAO (2.0 ± 1.0 events vs 0.1 ± 0.3 events; P<.01). Imaging follow-up revealed only 1 case of device thrombosis.
LAAO as an adjunctive therapy to OAC seems to be feasible and safe in patients with previous cardioembolic events despite optimal OAC. In our series, this strategy was associated with a low rate of cerebrovascular events after LAAO.
尽管进行了最佳口服抗凝治疗(OAC),但仍发生卒中复发,这可能是左心耳封堵术(LAAO)的一个新适应症。这些患者的异质性通常较高,因为瓣膜性心房颤动(VAF)很常见。本研究的目的是探讨LAAO作为OAC辅助治疗对尽管接受了最佳OAC治疗仍发生复发性卒中患者的作用。
该研究筛选了2009年至2017年间在9个中心接受经皮LAAO的连续患者。选择尽管接受了最佳OAC治疗仍发生复发性卒中的患者,而对OAC有绝对或相对禁忌症的患者不纳入本研究。
在研究期间接受LAAO的837例患者中,共有22例(2.6%)符合纳入标准。VAF的比例很高(38%),59%的患者在LAAO之前出现了不止一次心脏栓塞事件。所有患者均成功植入装置,未报告手术相关的重大不良事件。除3例患者外,所有患者在LAAO后继续抗凝治疗。中位临床随访1.8年(范围0.7 - 2.8年),仅报告了1例卒中事件和1例短暂性脑缺血发作,这意味着LAAO前后脑血管事件显著减少(2.0±1.0次事件 vs 0.1±0.3次事件;P<0.01)。影像学随访仅发现1例装置血栓形成。
对于尽管接受了最佳OAC治疗但既往有心脏栓塞事件的患者,LAAO作为OAC的辅助治疗似乎是可行且安全的。在我们的系列研究中,该策略与LAAO后较低的脑血管事件发生率相关。